Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
Mon May 23, 2016, 02:35 PM May 2016

John Oliver Shows Why U.S. Primaries And Caucuses Are ‘An Erratic Clusterf**k Every 4 Years’

May 23, 2016

How is it that a presidential candidate can win a primary or caucus, but get fewer delegates than those who lost?

Supporters of Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders remain angry over a superdelegate system they see as proof the primaries were rigged against their candidate. And on the Republican side, Donald Trump has complained about winning states such as Louisiana but receiving fewer delegates than one-time rival Ted Cruz.

“The thing is, I get why he’s annoyed,” John Oliver said on HBO’s “Last Week Tonight” on Sunday. “And there’s no clearer piece of evidence that our system is broken — no more thoroughly dead canary in the coal mine — than when Donald Trump is actually making sense.”

Oliver explained why the U.S. has “an erratic clusterfuck every four years” and proposed a way to solve the problem... on Groundhog’s Day next year.




Best explanation of our nominating process.




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Oliver Shows Why U.S. Primaries And Caucuses Are ‘An Erratic Clusterf**k Every 4 Years’ (Original Post) Beacool May 2016 OP
I watched this earlier. auntpurl May 2016 #1
Yes, the way we choose nominees is archaic and not democratic. Beacool May 2016 #3
Hah! Dem2 May 2016 #2
Thanks. Beacool May 2016 #4
Beat me to it pokerfan May 2016 #5
Great minds...... Beacool May 2016 #6
.... and he's putting it mildly. We obviously have NO valid process ladjf May 2016 #7

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
1. I watched this earlier.
Mon May 23, 2016, 04:06 PM
May 2016

I thought it was very well-explained - as is everything on Last Week Tonight. I do hope something is done about it. Otherwise, as he says, we do this every 4 years and it's not any better year to year.

My candidate won this go-round, but that doesn't mean I don't think we need reform.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
3. Yes, the way we choose nominees is archaic and not democratic.
Mon May 23, 2016, 04:46 PM
May 2016

That applies to both political parties.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
7. .... and he's putting it mildly. We obviously have NO valid process
Mon May 23, 2016, 05:58 PM
May 2016

for choosing qualified, ethical leaders.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»John Oliver Shows Why U.S...