Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Hillary Is Forced To Decline The Nomination For Her Scandals... (Original Post) berni_mccoy May 2016 OP
Hillary or Bust!!! timlot May 2016 #1
Yup! NWCorona May 2016 #11
Keep dreaming. There will be no indictment. Sanders will not get the nomination. brush May 2016 #2
Did I say the word indictment? I don't think it will take that much at this point... berni_mccoy May 2016 #5
Well enlighten us. What did you mean? brush May 2016 #13
Money says that even if Hillary is indicted the goalposts will be moved to a conviction. NWCorona May 2016 #17
It is not a CRIMNAL investigation. You can make that up either without being called on it. brush May 2016 #27
So what kind of Investigation involves both the FBI and the DOJ? NWCorona May 2016 #30
Just post the link, not your fervent hope. brush May 2016 #45
You are asking people to prove an idiotic negative. morningfog May 2016 #56
Nothing, huh? Just as I thought. brush May 2016 #59
LOL. Here it is again. read it this time. morningfog May 2016 #62
Still nothing about a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton. brush May 2016 #74
No you are changing your request. It's on you now. morningfog May 2016 #75
I posted a link twice. No response or apology, what gives? morningfog May 2016 #73
Here. LINK for you: morningfog May 2016 #60
DOJ answered this with court filings last month. IdaBriggs May 2016 #89
...! KoKo May 2016 #92
FBI does not do civil cases. Ash_F May 2016 #36
Just a link pls, not wishful thinking. And btw, Sanders is toast. brush May 2016 #47
Here you go Ash_F May 2016 #48
Oh, you got jokes. That proves what? brush May 2016 #49
You didn't read it did you? Ash_F May 2016 #50
That was fun, we should do that more often! yourpaljoey May 2016 #52
I am glad I helped you learn something today. Ash_F May 2016 #53
Funny how they disappear when presented with the proof they request yourpaljoey May 2016 #57
Woops replied to the wrong person with that last one. Ash_F May 2016 #58
I, of course, knew that yourpaljoey May 2016 #64
Where's the link that says Clinton is under criminal investigation brush May 2016 #65
1) FBI investigation was confirmed Ash_F May 2016 #67
Keep dreaming. That's all you Sanders supporters have left as he's lost the nomination. brush May 2016 #69
This does not have anything to do with Sanders Ash_F May 2016 #71
Tell me eactluy when did the FBI start doing civil cases? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #40
A link pls, not your hope. brush May 2016 #46
about what? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #51
The FBI only does criminal investigations. For fuck's sake, you can't be serious. morningfog May 2016 #55
It sure isn't a clearance review. 840high May 2016 #79
LOL. If it were, she'd flunk. n/t winter is coming May 2016 #87
LOLOLOL grasswire May 2016 #80
Post the link then. You guys need to stop praying. There will be no indictment. brush May 2016 #83
+1,000,001 dchill May 2016 #32
The former head of the D.I.A. (defense department equivalent of the C.I.A.), pdsimdars May 2016 #18
You don't know anything more about it than anyone else. brush May 2016 #37
Ex-General Flynn works for the Trump campaign. emulatorloo May 2016 #54
You are seriously delusional if you think Sanders is going to get the nomination Txbluedog May 2016 #3
He's attacking the corrupt DNC leadership. dchill May 2016 #35
... Ned_Devine May 2016 #68
When Hillary is forced to decline the nomination griffi94 May 2016 #4
Expectation met. Flighty McFlight May 2016 #25
If something were to happen it should be an open first ballot. NCTraveler May 2016 #6
Good pmorlan1 May 2016 #10
Can you show me where I haven't? NCTraveler May 2016 #19
The voters have already made that decision. Hillary will not be declining. brush May 2016 #22
Should the most outlandish reverie emanating from your fevered imagination come to pass ... salinsky May 2016 #7
She will not decline no matter what the circumstances. Punkingal May 2016 #8
Agree. Wellstone ruled May 2016 #12
Just because the two of you agree, who obviously have not paid attention to the issue, pdsimdars May 2016 #24
Sorry,but there are so many moving parts in D.C. Wellstone ruled May 2016 #42
i don't mean it like you think. Punkingal May 2016 #61
Not sure which 'scandal' could actually do this (even the DOJ said unless premeditated criminal eastwestdem May 2016 #9
Is that before or after Elvis returns from the dead? Vogon_Glory May 2016 #14
Yes, it's a big conspiracy with all those media outlets AND pdsimdars May 2016 #26
This may come as a shock, but most Hillary supporters would have voted for Bernie all along. TwilightZone May 2016 #15
She will NEVER, EVER, EVER decline the nomination. Skwmom May 2016 #16
I think some damaage will be coming out next week. pdsimdars May 2016 #28
I'll believe it when I see it. Skwmom May 2016 #33
We are all waiting to see. But Judicial Watch did say the judge will allow them to release pdsimdars May 2016 #90
She won't give up unless the supers abandon her. winter is coming May 2016 #88
Called it XemaSab May 2016 #94
We will have to borrow the hook from the Gong Show to get her off stage yourpaljoey May 2016 #63
LOL leftynyc May 2016 #20
These fevered fantasies are just so out of touch cali May 2016 #21
Yup. Agschmid May 2016 #29
That's not happening, despite your hopes. MineralMan May 2016 #23
For her sandals???? I don't think she wears sandals. Just saying. Gomez163 May 2016 #31
Anyone counting on Hillary's declining a nomination for President is likely to be disappointed. merrily May 2016 #34
She will never back out voluntarily. It matters not who gets hurt. senz May 2016 #38
Hillary 2016! We Democrats will unite against Trump and defeat him! skylucy May 2016 #39
... Ned_Devine May 2016 #70
I'll bet a dollar you won't be able to resist the urge to say, directly or indirectly, I told you so onenote May 2016 #41
Instead, you decided to say so now... brooklynite May 2016 #43
Despite the trollish nature of this post, yes, of course I would. MirrorAshes May 2016 #44
OK? Dem2 May 2016 #66
Sure you would - and you would love it - but not to worry DrDan May 2016 #72
We know there is a barney the dinosaur, but what about Bernie the dinosaur? dubyadiprecession May 2016 #76
He's not the DINO eom trudyco May 2016 #78
Biden 2016 Renew Deal May 2016 #77
Biden did not run Demsrule86 May 2016 #86
... SidDithers May 2016 #81
Or course you are also promising to get in line behind Clinton Fresh_Start May 2016 #82
Reads like a spoiler for Game of Thrones. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #84
You are in a state of Denial... Demsrule86 May 2016 #85
And one time, at band camp ... JoePhilly May 2016 #91
What scandals? XemaSab May 2016 #93
Dream Dream Dream... Demsrule86 May 2016 #95
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
5. Did I say the word indictment? I don't think it will take that much at this point...
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:22 PM
May 2016

But it would be nice to see Hillary held to the same standards as everyone else... as she always says. And that would mean an indictment.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
17. Money says that even if Hillary is indicted the goalposts will be moved to a conviction.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:31 PM
May 2016

Back when this story broke. It was so dismissed that the idea of a mere FBI investigation would have been a disqualifier for Hillary. Now she's officially under criminal investigation and she's still running.

You can’t make this stuff up!

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
62. LOL. Here it is again. read it this time.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:43 PM
May 2016
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs/faqs#faq_priorities

The FBI’s investigative authority is the broadest of all federal law enforcement agencies. The FBI has divided its investigations into a number of programs, such as domestic and international terrorism, foreign counterintelligence, cyber crime, public corruption, civil rights, organized crime/drugs, white-collar crime, violent crimes and major offenders, and applicant matters. The FBI’s investigative philosophy emphasizes close relations and information sharing with other federal, state, local, and international law enforcement and intelligence agencies. A significant number of FBI investigations are conducted in concert with other law enforcement agencies or as part of joint task forces.


Notice what is not on there: civil investigations or security review.
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
75. No you are changing your request. It's on you now.
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:45 PM
May 2016

You need to provide a link showing that the FBI does anything other than criminal investigations. I showed you that they don't.

The FBI is conducting a criminal investigation of Hillary's server set-up while at State.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
60. Here. LINK for you:
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:42 PM
May 2016
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs/faqs#faq_priorities

The FBI’s investigative authority is the broadest of all federal law enforcement agencies. The FBI has divided its investigations into a number of programs, such as domestic and international terrorism, foreign counterintelligence, cyber crime, public corruption, civil rights, organized crime/drugs, white-collar crime, violent crimes and major offenders, and applicant matters. The FBI’s investigative philosophy emphasizes close relations and information sharing with other federal, state, local, and international law enforcement and intelligence agencies. A significant number of FBI investigations are conducted in concert with other law enforcement agencies or as part of joint task forces.


Notice what is not on there: civil investigations or security review.
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
89. DOJ answered this with court filings last month.
Thu May 19, 2016, 11:43 PM
May 2016

It was posted multiple times here on DU. Here is one link - http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511856433

DOJ Claims Revealing FBI Declaration Will Jeopardize Clinton Email Investigation
by Rachel Stockman | 7:35 pm, April 27th, 2016

Attorneys with the U.S. Department of Justice say they cannot make public a classified FBI declaration because it would “adversely affect the ongoing investigation” into Hillary Clinton‘s private email server. The recent filing by DOJ attorneys, obtained by LawNewz.com, is significant because it not only acknowledges the ongoing federal probe, but also asserts that if the declaration is made public, it could “reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”

The DOJ’s memorandum is part of a FOIA lawsuit that was originally filed in federal court by Vice News reporter Jason Leopold. Leopold is seeking Clinton’s emails that the DOJ obtained from her private server. He is also seeking correspondence between the FBI and Clinton referencing the Clinton email server.

In March, the government filed a motion for summary judgement in the case, and incorporated this classified declaration as one of the supporting documents. Leopold’s attorneys argued that the declaration should be made public, or the DOJ should show cause for why it must be kept secret. On Tuesday, DOJ attorneys filed an memorandum in opposition to plaintiff’s motion to show cause.

The DOJ says in its filing:

Records responsive to Plaintiff’s request that are subject to FOIA relate to a pending investigation. The FBI has stated publicly that it received and “is working on a referral (from) Inspectors General in connection with former Secretary of State Clinton’s use of a private email server. The FBI therefore submitted a classified in camera, ex parte declaration to provide the Court with additional details to demonstrate that responsive information was properly withheld, and explained on the public record that this was the purpose of the in camera declaration.

Read more:
http://lawnewz.com/important/doj-claims-unsealing-fbi-declaration-could-jeopardize-clinton-email-investigation/


As has been explained to you multiple times, the FBI investigates crimes. On their website they have an "About Us" section dealing with their priorities:

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/quick-facts

Our Priorities
1. Protect the United States from terrorist attack
2. Protect the United States against foreign intelligence operations and espionage
3. Protect the United States against cyber-based attacks and high-technology crimes
4. Combat public corruption at all levels
5. Protect civil rights
6. Combat transnational/national criminal organizations and enterprises
7. Combat major white-collar crime
8. Combat significant violent crime


The bolding I have made for #2 and #4 appear to be the areas causing Hillary to be investigated.

You can learn more at the "Clinton Email Scandal Timeline" which details out how the FBI was able to recover the deleted emails from a non-secure cloud back up system last year which involved a couple of possible felony charges right there (destroying government records and allowing classified material to be viewed by staff at a company with no security clearance are both crimes).

I know it is hard for many people to grasp the depths of this debacle, but it is Very Bad.

brush

(53,776 posts)
65. Where's the link that says Clinton is under criminal investigation
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:45 PM
May 2016

That's what I thought you were posting, but that's not what you posted at all.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
67. 1) FBI investigation was confirmed
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016

2) FBI only does criminal investigations

3) What kind of investigation is the FBI doing?

4) A criminal investigation.

I hope this breakdown helped you.

brush

(53,776 posts)
69. Keep dreaming. That's all you Sanders supporters have left as he's lost the nomination.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:51 PM
May 2016

When the FBI announces that they've concluded this without any charges, what will you say then?

You actually think they are going to perp-walk Hillary out in cuffs and totally throw the election to the repugs, cause Sanders, a Democrat, certainly wouldn't win after his party was tainted like that?

Why that's the stuff of dreams, sorta like the unicorns we keep hearing about.

It ain't gonna happen, but keep praying.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
71. This does not have anything to do with Sanders
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:53 PM
May 2016

The establishment should have put up another favorite like Biden, or whoever. I don't care.

It is going to suck for all of us if it drops close to the GE.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
40. Tell me eactluy when did the FBI start doing civil cases?
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:04 PM
May 2016

by the way, there is also a civil case

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
51. about what?
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:36 PM
May 2016

Criminal



The FBI is conducting an investigation. (It’s the Federal Bureau of Investigation, after all.)

Inspectors General from the State Department and the intelligence community referred the case to the Executive Branch in July 2015. The referral memo made clear that the Inspectors General were not suggesting that anyone involved in Clinton’s email setup committed a crime. Rather, they were following their statutory obligation to inform the intelligence community about any potential security breach — namely, that Clinton possibly held classified information on her email server located outside secure government facilities.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/may/12/fbis-investigation-hillary-clintons-emails-recap/

CIVIL CASE

Why a Civil Case Over Emails Could Hurt Hillary Clinton More Than the FBI

Every year for more than two decades, the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch has filed scores of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for documents from the federal government, many in pursuit of a favorite target: Bill and Hillary Clinton. Now, with FOIA case No. F-2013-08812, they may finally have hit the political jackpot.


http://time.com/4337518/hillary-clinton-emails-judicial-watch-civil-lawsuit/

See easy, and those are in the write ups of two different moderate (I crack me up) media outlets.

Under the buss with both of them.

You should really stop demanding for links. These have been presented to you in difference versions and you still keep asking the same. Just because you do not understand the difference, does not mean the rest of us do not,

Learn the difference between a civil and a criminal case, For starters they have vastly different burdens of proof.
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
18. The former head of the D.I.A. (defense department equivalent of the C.I.A.),
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

Lt. General Flynn said that if he had done what Hillary did, he would probably already be in prison. (or something of that nature)

I just wonder how much special treatment she'll get.

You obviously don't know anything about it other than the nonsense Hillary has been putting out. Your faith in her story should have been shaken a little when Comey, the head of the FBI countered her "security review" narrative. If you were smart, you'd have started paying attention then.

brush

(53,776 posts)
37. You don't know anything more about it than anyone else.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:44 PM
May 2016

All these alleged reliable sources don't know either.

 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
3. You are seriously delusional if you think Sanders is going to get the nomination
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:20 PM
May 2016

If Hillary can't run. He keeps attacking the Democratic Party so his chances at getting the nomination are zilch

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
68. ...
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:48 PM
May 2016

Member since: Fri May 13, 2016, 07:36 PM
Number of posts: 152
Number of posts, last 90 days: 152

griffi94

(3,733 posts)
4. When Hillary is forced to decline the nomination
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:21 PM
May 2016

I'll expect to see pigs fly.

Large herds of glorious winged pigs.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. If something were to happen it should be an open first ballot.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:23 PM
May 2016

I will look at those throwing their hat in the ring and support who I think will make the best President.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
10. Good
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:26 PM
May 2016
NCTraveler (16,653 posts)
6. If something were to happen it should be an open first ballot.

I will look at those throwing their hat in the ring and support who I think will make the best President.


I hope you will defend Bernie supporters when they make the same statement about voting for who they think will make the best President.
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
19. Can you show me where I haven't?
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

Sanders has lost all credibility in the last week but I still think he should go to Cali. This is an election. He could show some class and change his rhetoric but I don't see that happening. The nomination process is over but the people in the remaining states deserve to have their voices heard.

I'm still not sure what you are saying. If something were to happen to Clinton the will of the voters can no longer be heard. The person the voters chose will be out. Sanders supporters are trying to subvert the will of the voters. Two totally different things.

brush

(53,776 posts)
22. The voters have already made that decision. Hillary will not be declining.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:33 PM
May 2016

If you have anything real other than your fervent wishes for that to happen, pls state it now.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
7. Should the most outlandish reverie emanating from your fevered imagination come to pass ...
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:23 PM
May 2016

... rest assured, that I will certainly back the Democratic nominee.

I'm Democrat that way.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
12. Agree.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:27 PM
May 2016

If there is some there there,we would have seen it by now. And Bernie would have exposed it . We are seeing Democracy Play Out on the national stage,and we are all better for it.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
24. Just because the two of you agree, who obviously have not paid attention to the issue,
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:34 PM
May 2016

doesn't amount to a hill of beans. Look into it in some detail before making such baseless statements.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
42. Sorry,but there are so many moving parts in D.C.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:12 PM
May 2016

on this issue. No,I am not a Clinton defender. The Rethugs are just playing a media game as well as some one who has a axe to grind. Yes,as this drags out,Clinton's polling numbers take a hit,and it favors Bernie,and the media is doing their damnest to keep this alive. Washington is known for never holding a secret and in that is were I come from. Expecting this issue will be settled shortly with the Freedom Watch/Judical Watch and their Right Wing so called lawsuit against Clinton and her Aides. The Judge hearing this case is a case study in it's self.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
61. i don't mean it like you think.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:42 PM
May 2016

I think she won't give up no matter what...even if it means losing, she will take the nomination. Who in the establishment is going to fight her? It has been shown the Clintons have all the power....they have the establishment, and they have the media.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
9. Not sure which 'scandal' could actually do this (even the DOJ said unless premeditated criminal
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:26 PM
May 2016

activity can be proven, there will only be fines issued regarding the email case). But, I'll certainly agree to vote for anyone running against Trump. And that is saying something, because I really dislike Sanders.

Vogon_Glory

(9,117 posts)
14. Is that before or after Elvis returns from the dead?
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:30 PM
May 2016

Is that before or after Elvis returns from the dead? Many of us Clintonistas voted for Hillary not just because she's better-qualified than Mr. Sanders, but because we've learned to be doubtful of all the little right wing-nuts who've been busy fabricating fables about the Clintons for over 20 years.

IMO, Bernie's fan-boys and fan-girls would do well not to take the verbiage emanating from such "trustworthy" news sites like World Net Daily, NewsMax, Fox, Alec Jones, and Drudge at face value.


🙄

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
26. Yes, it's a big conspiracy with all those media outlets AND
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:36 PM
May 2016

The OBAMA DoJ, Inspector Generals of both the State Department and Intelligence, the FBI.
Seems like EVERYONE is part of the big conspiracy except Hillary.
If that sounds implausible, that's because it is.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
15. This may come as a shock, but most Hillary supporters would have voted for Bernie all along.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:30 PM
May 2016

You see, we understand that defeating Trump in the GE is of paramount importance, and that any Democrat is 100x better than any Republican.

Hmm, that sounds familiar....

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
33. I'll believe it when I see it.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:39 PM
May 2016

I've started to wonder if this is just a way to discourage a real primary fight.
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
90. We are all waiting to see. But Judicial Watch did say the judge will allow them to release
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:17 AM
May 2016

some of their deposition.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
88. She won't give up unless the supers abandon her.
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:58 PM
May 2016

And even then, she won't do it until the last minute. I don't think she believes it can happen.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
20. LOL
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

Still in that denial stage I see. How pathetic. But yes, I will hold my nose tighter than I ever have and vote for Bernie even though he no chance of winning the general.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
70. ...
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:52 PM
May 2016

Member since: Sat Apr 16, 2016, 08:41 PM
Number of posts: 203
Number of posts, last 90 days: 203

onenote

(42,700 posts)
41. I'll bet a dollar you won't be able to resist the urge to say, directly or indirectly, I told you so
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:11 PM
May 2016

That is if Clinton is forced to decline the nomination, which is still an 'if" not a "when" despite your professed certainty.

MirrorAshes

(1,262 posts)
44. Despite the trollish nature of this post, yes, of course I would.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:16 PM
May 2016

I know you all want to goad us into sinking to your level (with some success, which is a shame) but if indeed Bernie did somehow become the nominee, of course we would vote for him.

Why? Because the future of the country is at stake here, not just your feel-good purity tests. I will vote for whomever I have to vote for to secure the safety of this country, and that means keeping it out of the hands of republicans AT ALL COSTS.

dubyadiprecession

(5,707 posts)
76. We know there is a barney the dinosaur, but what about Bernie the dinosaur?
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:50 PM
May 2016

His campaign will be extinct by the end of the primaries.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
82. Or course you are also promising to get in line behind Clinton
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:00 PM
May 2016

if Clinton accepts the nomination....
after all you do not want to have Trump as the next POTUS

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
85. You are in a state of Denial...
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:51 PM
May 2016

She will not decline the nomination...she will be the president Thank God...and not Trump and certainly not Bernie ever.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When Hillary Is Forced To...