WaPo: A vote for the future or for the past? - By Harold Meyerson
The 2012 presidential election is fundamentally a contest between our future and our past. Barack Obamas America is the America that will be; Mitt Romneys is the America that was. And the distance between the two is greater, perhaps, than in any election weve had since the Civil War.
The demographic bases of the rival coalitions couldnt be more different. Mondays poll from the Pew Research Center is just the latest to show Obama with a decisive lead (in this case, 21 percentage points) among voters younger than 30. Obamas margin declines to six points among voters ages 30 through 44, and he breaks even with Romney among voters ages 45 through 64. Romneys home turf is voters 65 and older; among those, he leads Obama by 19 points.
Age polarization is not specific to the presidential election. On a host of issues, as diverse as gay and lesbian rights and skepticism about the merits of capitalism, polls have shown that younger voters are consistently more tolerant and well to the left of their elders.
Nor is age the only metric through which we can differentiate our future from our past. The other is race, as the nation grows more racially diverse (or, more bluntly, less white) each year. While the 2000 Census put whites share of the U.S. population at 69.1 percent, that share had declined to 63.7 percent in the 2010 Census, while the proportion of Hispanics rose from 12.5 percent to 16.3 percent. In raw numbers, total white population increased by just 1.2 percent during the decade, while the African American segment grew by 12.3 percent and the Hispanic share by 43 percent. Demographers predict that the white share of the U.S. population will fall beneath 50 percent in the 2050 Census.
more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/harold-meyerson-electing-the-future-or-the-past/2012/10/30/7dd06708-2200-11e2-8448-81b1ce7d6978_story.html?wpisrc=nl_opinions