Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Bill Clinton withold his Intelligence Briefings from Hillary before she cast her IWR vote? (Original Post) reddread May 2016 OP
Legally, he would have to. nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author reddread May 2016 #8
First ladies jehop61 May 2016 #14
Nope. 2000. n/t winter is coming May 2016 #16
thanks reddread May 2016 #18
Why would he still be getting security briefings in 2002? Press Virginia May 2016 #2
because reddread May 2016 #3
interesting. didn't know this Press Virginia May 2016 #5
I have to believe she was one of the very best informed and COMPLETELY in the loop. reddread May 2016 #7
WE knew it was bs. Jennylynn May 2016 #4
it is so much worse than that in retrospect reddread May 2016 #6
Exactly. I didn't need a briefing to see it was 100% crap. lagomorph777 May 2016 #19
If I were going to cast a vote that would cause the deaths of American soldiers... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #9
if there were WMD's (or for that matter any of the other pre-invasion publicity campaign claims) reddread May 2016 #10
I didn't need an Intelligence briefing to know what we were being told was a lie. onecaliberal May 2016 #11
are lies now expected and preferred? reddread May 2016 #13
It's fucking ridiculous... Lies are NOT preferred. Sadly they are expected, because only a handful onecaliberal May 2016 #15
+1. The level of magical thinking going on was a huge hint we were being lied to. winter is coming May 2016 #17
Intelligence was available to her. HooptieWagon May 2016 #12

Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #1)

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
7. I have to believe she was one of the very best informed and COMPLETELY in the loop.
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:46 PM
May 2016

and a vigorous proponent.
thats some mistake alright.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
6. it is so much worse than that in retrospect
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:44 PM
May 2016

she WAS the bs.
and now the Democratic Party wants to seal the deal for good.
they can seal it with a kiss.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
19. Exactly. I didn't need a briefing to see it was 100% crap.
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:16 PM
May 2016

She has no excuse at all, especially now that we've seen what the CIA really was saying.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
9. If I were going to cast a vote that would cause the deaths of American soldiers...
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:50 PM
May 2016

I sure as heck would ask the person that had the most intelligence information second only to Bush and his cabinet. Weapons of mass destruction don't just pop up magically after 9 months...

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
10. if there were WMD's (or for that matter any of the other pre-invasion publicity campaign claims)
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:53 PM
May 2016

I bet she would know where to find the receipts.

onecaliberal

(32,861 posts)
15. It's fucking ridiculous... Lies are NOT preferred. Sadly they are expected, because only a handful
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:02 PM
May 2016

are honest, and not bought off.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
17. +1. The level of magical thinking going on was a huge hint we were being lied to.
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:06 PM
May 2016

"We'll be greeted as liberators"--ha! There was a lot of talk about how we'd go in and kick ass, but if anyone asked, "And then what happens?" there was never a concrete answer, just more emotional rhetoric.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
12. Intelligence was available to her.
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:46 PM
May 2016

An abbreviated intelligence report presentation was given to Senate. Bob Graham and others, but particularly Graham, objected to the report for its bias. An unredacted report was then made available for Senators to read in a secure room, which included evidence Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 which wasn't invluded in the presentation. Only a few Senators bothered to read the unredacted report, all voted against the war. Clinton didn't bother to read the report, called SoS Rices office and asked how she should vote.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Did Bill Clinton withold ...