Data from Indiana Shows Sanders Losing Badly with Inaccurate Psychics

[GreatGazoo]

As Hillary notches her 18th Second Place finish of the 2016 primaries, doubts surround the ability of Bernie Sanders to win over the inaccurate psychics vote. Data shows that Inaccurate Psychics favor Hillary Clinton over Sanders by a high margin, almost 8 to 1. The number of inaccurate psychics has grown sharply in the last 24 hours and winning these voters over may be difficult for Sanders.

The prognosticators at 538 gave Hillary and 91% chance of winning Indiana. Their inaccuracy is as strong as their support for the front runner.

Sanders also performed poorly among those who ignored exit polls all day long and among MSM personalities who are paid to insert the phrase "but Clinton is still ahead in the delegate count" into every sentence about a Sanders win.

[msongs]

1. more math - each indiana delegate netted cost bernie $200K nt

[NWCorona]

3. I think team Hillary realizes the mistake of not competing in Indiana was right about now.

[GreatGazoo]

7. the Clintons were all over Indiana and they lost anyway

[NWCorona]

9. I'm just rubbing it in.

[GreatGazoo]

13. I'm agreeing with you.

[NWCorona]

14. Thanks!

[rhett o rick]

8. You forgot to give us a link.

[msongs]

19. bernie spent a million plus and got 5/6 delegates net. Im sure u can find that data if u want nt

[rhett o rick]

21. Gloat while you can. Sooner or later the People will throw the corrupt out of

our government. I guess you feel comfortable siding with the Rich Fat Cats.

[litlbilly]

2. Are we sure Bernie won? Look at these poor saps, they have no idea:)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107123538

[mindwalker_i]

6. Wow, that was an excercise in increasingly frentic masturbation

... they ran into the law of diminishing returns.

[shanti]

44. And a hard wall, that was n/t

[jillan]

4. Great post!

[JudyM]

33. +1.

Nice snark.

[Skink]

5. As a.psychic

I have a feeling. It's not good for Trump.

[Logical]

11. I bet you are correct!

[bettyellen]

10. and registered Dems! Gosh. He has no chance without the GOP boosting him up.

[GreatGazoo]

12. Independents are the biggest group of the three at 42%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx

Clinton does poorly with the Independents we need to beat Trump.

[bettyellen]

15. She will do just fine against Trump.

[GreatGazoo]

16. there's that psychic thing I was talking about

[bettyellen]

18. Women ad POC voters hate him, and love her. A Dem cannot win without Women and POC- and

SBS does not have nearly as many. Sad for him!

[GreatGazoo]

29. So your new prediction is those groups would vote for Trump ?

If you play poker please invite me. I could use the money.

White women represented 43 percent of Indiana Democrats, up from an average of 34 percent in prior primaries. Fifty-six percent of white women voted for Bernie Sanders, a 12-point gain from previous primaries.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/indiana-exit-poll-more-white-women-younger-voters-liberals-deliver-n567501

The boost came from female voters, a longtime Clinton stronghold. The former secretary of state’s support among women dropped by 11 points, while Sanders’ showing jumped by 9 points.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/2016/04/new_poll_female_voters_flock_to_bernie_sanders_from_hillary_clinton

Clinton support Among Non-white Voters has collapsed

Public Policy Polling, a widely respected polling organization, released a poll showing that Sanders leads Clinton among African-American voters in Wisconsin by 11 points.

It’s all part of a dramatic national trend that has seen Clinton’s support among nonwhite voters dwindle to well under a third of what it was just a month ago — not nearly enough support to carry her, as it did throughout the Deep South, to future electoral victories in the Midwest and Northeast.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/hillary-clintons-support-_b_9579544.html

[bettyellen]

36. You don't seem to get the fact the we are talking about winning (blue states) in the GE. And cherry

picking old news from HuffPo- is pretty dishonest- how long ago was Wisconsin? LOL. Nope- Hillary's number are improving where they matter. Hillary vs Trump. Anything else is irrelevant.

[JudyM]

34. bettyellen, he certainly would if he were the dem nominee vs tRump. PLUS independents. Nt

[bettyellen]

37. In some areas but possibly not others. Blue state Dems have been going for Hillary.

People here can try and spin that however they want, so can Huff Po. Does not make SBS a winner here by any metric.

[druidity33]

41. We need swing state Independents...

in order to win the GE. Blue state dems are great, but they'll vote dem all the time. Bernie will bring in swing state indies by a MUCH HIGHER margin than Hillary will. That's a fact.

[Hydra]

17. I'm an Independent that votes for Dems when they don't vote for illegal wars

I've gotten a large number of disinvites from the party this year from Hillary supporters. Where are you planning on getting GE votes from? GE and Disney?

[msongs]

20. sanders loves spending for more war...maybe he can get lots of votes from Lockheed nt

[Hydra]

22. Oh, zing!

I guess he'll have to stand in line at the Clinton foundation to get an appointment with them. I'm sure the coronated one or her husband can get that set up for a small fee...say, 3 installments of $600,000 for speeches.

[Matt_R]

45. To the elites it does not matter, they bought and paid for Clinton and Trump.

If either win it is a loss for the non-elite. Sanders getting this far shows OWS and such are still going strong, we need to keep the momentum going forward.

[pinebox]

25. Wrong. In a GE everybody votes and what you saw last night reflects that

Hillary is the weaker candidate in a GE. Period.
She will lose to Trump should she be the nominee.

[John Poet]

23. Not only in Indiana, but on DU, Bernie loses the bad psychic vote.

[ProfessorPlum]

24. Excellent post

Well done

[Smarmie Doofus]

26. K and R. U'r funny. n/t

[islandmkl]

27. however...those mystics who can see the future while looking in a mirror at past events...

have a 100% accuracy record in foretelling any and all past events...

which, while portending absolutely nothing concerning the future, gives them great comfort which they then share with a certain group of followers....

it is noted, however, that they don't look further back than 2009...and in fact, many tend to only concentrate on the last 12 months...

also, the mirror has certain clarity problems between 1992 and 2000...

[VulgarPoet]

28. "One Reason To Not Pay Any Attention To Nate Silver"

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/04/is-538-in-the-bag-for-hillary/

[kayakjohnny]

30. Love this!

Brightened up my morning!

[LWolf]

31. K & R

[dchill]

32. K&R

[Betty Karlson]

35. Delightful satire! You're the best!

[lmbradford]

38. Best post of the day

Thank you for speaking the truth!!

[GreatGazoo]

40. thanks for that. glad you liked it

[vintx]

39. LOL!

[Warren DeMontague]

43. but those threads are great fun.

[GreatGazoo]

46. almost as much fun as the Pope visit freakouts were