Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[sufrommich]

1. But he's anti Hillary,so it's cool.

I just served on this jury:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017363703


Andrew Fucking Napolitano,trashing Hillary on Fox News posted by another Bernie fan. They've sure got some strange bedfellows.

[sufrommich]

4. He did his typical shtick on the Young Turks and

they ate it up. The closer Sanders comes to losing,the more the true colors of some of these "progressives" show.

[JaneyVee]

15. HE is actually suing Hillary. Judicial Watch and Citizens United.

Anything he says should be banned from DU.

[pampango]

2. As a Bernie supporter, using that source for a DU post is embarrassing. n/t

[canoeist52]

5. Who did David Brock work for?

[NCTraveler]

6. Some don't give a fuck.

The Daily Caller was being promoted here yesterday.

A small group doesn't give a fuck because these are the people they admire and agree with.

[bigtree]

18. but, but, Brock!

...smh.

[Doctor_J]

7. Just like Blue Nation Review

[Doctor_J]

10. Yes. He helped Slappy Thomas get confirmed

[all american girl]

16. Some people see the error of their ways and we always welcome them into the fold.

I includes the love of my life...raised a republican, married him knowing he was a republican (though not a mouth breathing republican), and he is now a happy clappy liberal. Now considering he's an officer in the Army, and most are very conservative, I did good

[Doctor_J]

20. Ans some remain sleazy hatchet men who just change jerseys

[all american girl]

21. Not going to disagree with you on that...but I do remember a time when we liked

that sleazy hatchet man....

[FlatBaroque]

12. .

[Gwhittey]

14. What's your opinion of "Clinton Cash"?

Well I do know some of it was used to hire people to post on the Internet talking points for HRC via Brock.
You can get a good idea who they are. They usually just join up and then post Brock talking points.

[LanternWaste]

22. you have a rather erudite command of your second language. One may hope you begin to utilize it soon

No doubt, you have a rather erudite command of your second language. One may hope you begin to utilize it soon in a way which better reflects your character.

[Codeine]

19. Anyone pushing that shit here should be banned.

We really don't need to carry water for the Free Republic crowd.

[karynnj]

23. Welcome to DU - nice job on putting all of this together

I am not a Clinton supporter, but I have been appalled by the willingness of some to post ANYTHING from any source to get out negative information on Clinton (or Sanders - for that matter).

Once the general election begins, we might need a group that archives information (from as credible a source as possible) to debunk anything that can be debunked. I know something like this existed in the 2005 - 2008 period. It would be great to have a resource that any of us can turn to that has the truth. I don't see anything like that now.

I know that Correct the Record and other Brock led efforts so this - but I know I would prefer more non partisan analysis. Not only am I more comfortable using those sources, I think they are more credible to anyone who believes something that is not true. Even when those sources are more nuanced in explaining what is and what is not true, they can be more persuasive.

I also think that the right actually inoculates the Clintons from some real questions - because for many people, there is no motivation to even consider that the accusation is anything other than a lie.