2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTo both Hillary and Bernie supporters: What makes Hillary's candidacy attractive to Charles Koch?
Yes, I concede, it is not an unqualified attraction, but what do you think is at its basis?
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)which is a fairly low bar and can't really be considered as an endorsement.
BirdieSanders
(26 posts)...Which Is, Coincidentally, Bernie & Co.'s #1 Concern About Her
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Pays... her "going rate!" As a congressional candidate in 2006, I was offered all the contributions that I need if I was willing to "Play Ball" with the Pharmaceutical Industry! There ya have it... I made a different decision than Hillary has made serially throughout her political "career."
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)I seriously doubt that Koch does not know what he wants...
RandySF
(58,801 posts)Republicans do this all the time. They praised Hillary in 2008 and Tsongas in 1992. Trump just called on Vernue to run third party.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)The government grew 2-1/2 times as much during the Bush administration than it did during the Clinton administration.
That's what he said in the interview.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)He is only against it like 99.9% of the other Republicans in that they want big government just their polices. Like Koch brothers have love Federal dollars going to oil companies as corporate welfare. Giving federal money to feed a poor family not so much. Koch are for Koch because the 60 billion dollars they already have are not enough because they could only buy 70% of countries on earth.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)Of course they want federal dollars going to them. Just like young people want someone to pay for college. Just like I want to see infrastructure improvements. We all want the government to work for us.
He didn't like the government growth under Dubya and he said as much. He preferred the government rate of growth under Clinton. Hardly an endorsement of Clinton, more of a statement about how he feels about government growth.
blm
(113,057 posts)know that another moron (even a bigger moron than W) Republican administration will tank the stock market.
Kochs expected to have a Republican they were in full control of: Rand, Walker, Cruz, Rubio, et al
.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)emulatorloo
(44,121 posts)Kochs wanted Walker.
He's smart enough to know Trump and Cruz are unelectable.
So they aren't going to spend money on the presidential election.
The Kochs will instead spend their money to elect wingnut senators and reps. And states and city councils.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,002 posts)with a Democratic agenda.
She is a good person.
She's the smartest in class.
He wants to see a woman as President in his lifetime.
Anyone voting for Hillary could have any number of reasons.
Demsrule86
(68,564 posts)In February, he wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post praising Bernie...they do want Bernie you know ...very disappointing to them that Hillary has won.
http://www.newser.com/story/220840/surprise-koch-brother-praises-sanders-in-op-ed.html
NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)he is a good judge of character when it comes to someone's political stances?
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)What part of that platform would Charles Koch not get behind?
If I made billions of dollars under Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama, I would not be pessimistic that adding another Clinton on the tail of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Clinton wouldn't be such a bad bet for my continued profitability.
NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)that when Hillary takes a newly progressive stance that there is a better than even chance that there will be a reversal at an appropriate moment?
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)If nominated and then elected, I'm sure that Hillary would offer gun legislation that is 100% destined to fail in Congress, and then she would shrug her shoulders and say "I tried" before she went back to protecting Wall Street and corporate America from greedy orphans and needy widows.
choie
(4,111 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Seems they were eyeing him for a while.
That is about as real as what you are promoting.
Fact is, this whole thing with Trump is batshit crazy. I bet people like the Kochs are scared shitless and sending every warning shot they can to the Republican Party. Nothing that is happening on our side compares to what they are currently experiencing. Some on their side are in fear.
You and others take the Kochs at their word. I won't. I know enough to know they will be spending well over a billion dollars to defeat Clinton.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is apparent that Koch is the devil himself.
I doubt he supports Hillary in any way. I thought the Kochs were libertarians who want the government out of the economy to the point where they think it should do zero regulation. He would think of Hillary as being for big government.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)thank you.
SHe doesn't say the same things in public that she says behind closed doors. Guessing he knows something you don't
NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)Yes, government just the perfect size to be run by benevolent mega-donors
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)THe Oligarchy prefers people they can buy.
I think it's that simple
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Nobody else is buying it
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Is that a trick question?
NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)It's a genuine question because it is exploratory and open to surprising answers
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Unlikely to lead US into a nuclear war
NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)to be exposed to sniper fire when she sat in a plane landing in Iraq, she would (in my modest opinion) most sensibly back off when when it comes to nukes, because, if for no other reason it might negatively impact her and her peers' net worth.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)n/t
stellanoir
(14,881 posts)NobodyInParticular
(102 posts)reaching out to Hillary was Rupert Murdoch. Whatever else you might want to say about it, the ability (and perhaps particularly Hillary's ability) to reach across the isle has been acknowledged.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)It was an admission that there is no one competent running on the Republican side. It looked to me as though he thought that even a Democrat would be preferable to an egotistical loose cannon like Trump or an obstructionist ideologue like Cruz.
The Onion's file on the Koch brothers is almost as funny as its file on Joe Biden.
http://www.theonion.com/search?q=koch+brothers
http://www.theonion.com/search?q=biden
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Trump is an unpredictable wild card. Cruz is a zealot.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Trump is the sort of fellow who could wreck the economy or get us into a major war. I'm not talking about some war like Iraq or Vietnam that had a high human cost but presented little or no existential threat to the US, but one that could permanently damage the country, eg a nuclear exchange with Russia or a civil war. Neither of those scenarios strikes me as especially likely but then Trump didn't strike me as the likely nominee last summer either.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)I get the general impression the two don't like one another. They may both be billionaires, but they have different agendas. Trump is not an ideologue (Robert Reich said that -- not just me), while Koch has his Randian agenda.
Notwithstanding anything he says, I think his only attraction to HRC is that she can be reasonably expected to act in a predictable and stable manner. Trump, on the other hand, isn't predictable and won't do Koch's bidding.