If Secretary Clinton gives her standard answer on the transcripts at the debate

[DefenseLawyer]

You know "I'll release them if the Republicans release theirs" There needs to be some follow up. Why is that your standard for releasing your speeches? What speeches exactly do you want them to release? Why do you care what Republicans do? How can you continue to call yourself the most transparent candidate in history if you can't share with the public what bankers paid you millions of dollars to say to them? I'm not holding my breath.

[warrprayer]

1. That Rainy Day Feeling

[Lizzie Poppet]

4. A-yup!

[warrprayer]

7. LOL

Too funny.

[Gregorian]

2. Here's what answers I got when asking a similar question-

From a wonderful DUer:

If she continues to sandbag the transcripts,

then the issue becomes What is Hillary hiding?
and Why is she so afraid to release the transcripts of paid speeches?


I liked it.

[Lizzie Poppet]

3. "I'll release them if the Republicans release theirs"

Solidarity with her fellow conservatives...what's not to like?

[DefenseLawyer]

9. Regardless of what one thinks of the transcripts as an issue

That answer is ridiculous. It makes no sense. But then again, every journalist just seems to take it and move on, so maybe it's the perfect answer.

[Qutzupalotl]

5. She's transparent, all right. We can see right through her.

Leaders don't say, "You go first," followers do.

[BernieforPres2016]

6. Pressing for this is the role of an independent press; they should be suing her for the transcripts

But the corporate media is in the tank for Hillary.

[randome]

8. You can't sue for private transcripts of speeches made by a private citizen.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)[/center][/font][hr]