2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMSNBC: Clinton Staffers In Colorado Aren't Telling Sanders Supporters Where To Caucus
I'm not quite sure what's going on here. My best guess is that Clinton people are cold-calling Democrats. If the person called does not favor Hillary, that person would be given no caucus information, even if that information is requested.
This doesn't seem to be in any way illegal. But I suppose some could reasonably say it's unethical. Here's the MSNBC clip.

jillan
(39,451 posts)And Hillary is officially on notice:
If you win the presidency, you better fight as dirty as you are RIGHT NOW, to defeat the republican crap in Congress, and to promote the 99%-friendly promises you are making right now.
If you turn Right, and govern like republican-lite, I will make sure to yell very loudly for you to be Primaried in 2020. So, maybe you shouldn't get too comfy in that big White House.
So, are we clear??
Beowulf
(761 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)If we call someone who then identifies themselves as a Clinton supporter, we simply say "Thank you" and move on to the next call. Our job, just like the Clinton's phone banking volunteers, is to use our time to identify our candidate's supporters and get them to the polls. There is NOTHING unethical or nefarious about this.
What is happening, that is wrong, is when a county Dem party, that is supposed to be neutral, doesn't post the caucus places on their website, or doesn't tell Sanders supporters where to caucus when they call the office, or never answers emails from a Sanders supporter.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I suspected this was the case. For both parties.
I wish people would stop trying to make up things to be upset about.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)If I were the manager of that reporter, or the woman off camera who replied to him, I would make them both brush up on political processes before I allowed them to cover any more political stories. They are supposed to be the professionals, not the Sanders supporter at the caucus, or even people on this thread who are not saavy to the finer details of the GOTV process.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)That's her middle name.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)that her picture is in the dictionary under the definition of "unethical."
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)TheBlackAdder
(27,620 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)It would appear the DNClintons have broken the agreement with Sanders, and he isn't obliged to honor it any longer. OTOH, after filing to run as a Dem, there will be many states that won't let him now file as an Indie...so I'm guessing he won't.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Unlike his opponent, he's a person of his word. I trust him to keep it this time, too.
I'm a bit sorry, as it would give a chance for the numbers of Americans who aren't willing to accept the intolerable status quo to be vividly demonstrated. But I also don't think a similar indy candidate going to happen on the other side, and that means a GOP president, for sure. I think we're getting that anyway, if Hillary wins...but a Bernie indy run would guarantee it. He wouldn't risk that, I don't think.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)and his supporters play dirty pool..........
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)But anyway, this is pure fallacy of composition. For all we know it's only one phone banker doing this; we don't know whether it's representative of the campaign as a whole, and the news media makes no effort to find out because the news media thrives on fake controversy. Phone banking is a numbers game, those people are trying to get through as many calls as possible and they have no incentive to have time-wasting conversations with people who say they're voting for someone else.
Also, as a voter it's your responsibility to know where your own damn polling place is.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's up to campaigns to inform their supporters of where to go. An opposition campaign typically says thank you and disconnects when they get a no. They don't give poll information.
Bad Thoughts
(2,504 posts)... to tear down barriers and obstructions to political expression, and to give information to everyone, even to those who would vote Republican.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Voter disenfranchisement is not a policy which I wish to see Democrats engaging in!
This is disgustingly a tactic of the GOP...
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)some don't feel that way. That is why IMO they slander honest people because they know they would do anything to win and expect others to be as dishonest as themselves.
jillan
(39,451 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)
blame everyone but themselves
WiffenPoof
(2,404 posts)Told my wife and we just shook our heads. It's little crap like this that just makes me cringe.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)That's bullshit. If the caller says they're not voting for Clinton,they say "thank you" and hang up.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)If the call went as you described, then no one on either end brought up the subject of caucus locations. But the MSNBC reporter made a point of saying that caucus info was simply not given out to the Sanders supporters.
So either the reporter is very misinformed, or information was being selectively withheld. Based on my viewing of the clip (many times), I'm going with the latter possibility.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)Telling people to come to the caucus might be considered information meant to be shared on a "need to know basis." It is about sins of omission really. Of course one can question the ethics of the thing, but the other side will simply feign innocence.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)There's no reason for them to say a thing to Bernie supporters other than, "thank you, goodbye."
brer cat
(23,174 posts)I am a Sanders supporter. I have been phone banking for him.
If we call someone who then identifies themselves as a Clinton supporter, we simply say "Thank you" and move on to the next call. Our job, just like the Clinton's phone banking volunteers, is to use our time to identify our candidate's supporters and get them to the polls. There is NOTHING unethical or nefarious about this.
It helps to understand how phone banking works before getting all hot and bothered over nothing.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Good luck with that -- no principles.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)No flip flopping here.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)onecaliberal
(31,552 posts)we used to despise in Republicans?
jillan
(39,451 posts)onecaliberal
(31,552 posts)New Earth
(9,745 posts)that they are ok with this stuff
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Like candidate, like supporter...
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Those making phone calls for campaign don't further engage anyone that they get a no from. You say thank you and hang up. There is no obligation to give poll information.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)In defense of underhandedness. She gets her funds from the DNC. The party and Mrs. Clinton should be promoting the idea of getting us all to caucus.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)I liked about you.............
renate
(13,776 posts)Caucuses are stupid anyway (even if they benefit Bernie tonight). Voting by mail makes SO MUCH SENSE, not least because people wouldn't get lost on the way to casting a vote in what is supposed to be a freaking democracy.
LisaM
(27,593 posts)I don't think you should have to pay to vote for one thing. But it's also not effective - turnout last fall was the lowest percentage since 1932. They have a few drop boxes, but they are madly inconvenient (one is in a park), so if you do want to use a drop box you'd better have a car available, or expect a long bus ride. I far prefer voting in person (the mail-in option was always available to those who wanted it, so it's not as if people who like that option can't have it). I'm not sure why they've clung to this system when it doesn't have any real benefits.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)Guess Tim Eyman's backers see no financial gain to be had from eliminating the stamp tax. Still, your point that this is what the postage on the return-ballots amounts to is well taken.
LisaM
(27,593 posts)That was another thing. And - the one time I did try to mail it, it got sent back (nothing major on the ballot, thank goodness) because I mailed it after work from downtown and the post office closes at 4:30 p.m.
They actually have a very high percentage of rejected ballots with this system, which is worrisome. At least when you voted in person, if you made a mistake, either the machine would catch it or you could get a new ballot.
George II
(67,782 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Voting is a sacrosanct right. If the biggest republican douche alive asks me where and when to vote, I will tell them.
George II
(67,782 posts)....about 5 years after he was born.
I've lived in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and Connecticut.
What's your problem?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Which may be worse.
Major Nikon
(36,742 posts)On Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:29 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
No. IF you lived in the US you would know what a dick move that is.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1387895
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
I explained to this guy that I've lived in the US my entire life, and detailed where I lived. Yet he doubles down with is smarmy insult. PLEASE hide this!
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:37 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation:
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
morningfog
(18,115 posts)OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)Live your principles.
Karma13612
(4,485 posts)Generic Other
(28,978 posts)There is usually the pretense of being on the same team.
laruemtt
(3,992 posts)tell me jack sh*^............
WillyT
(72,631 posts)
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Boldine
(86 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Those partisan.............
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1386998
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
disgusting rw trash
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:52 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sorry, Alerter. I think this cartoon is spot-on.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's not funny to me, but it's meant to be humor. I say let it stand.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I agree this is disgusting, but as I keep saying a couple of times a day, I don't hide posts unless one DUer bullies another one. But this IS stupid.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Hide all posts from Republicans.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Troll
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: She's going to get that coronation interupted, whether it's bernie, an indictment, or special investigators. Bitter nasty Hillionares, no alert abuse for you.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Dem2
(8,164 posts)On Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Those partisan.............
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1386998
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
disgusting rw trash
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:52 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sorry, Alerter. I think this cartoon is spot-on.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's not funny to me, but it's meant to be humor. I say let it stand.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I agree this is disgusting, but as I keep saying a couple of times a day, I don't hide posts unless one DUer bullies another one. But this IS stupid.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Hide all posts from Republicans.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Troll
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: She's going to get that coronation interupted, whether it's bernie, an indictment, or special investigators. Bitter nasty Hillionares, no alert abuse for you.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)


UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)I really feel terrible I have brought children into this world.
global1
(24,908 posts)not fit to be President because of it.
It's embarrassing. I shudder to think what people around the world are thinking about how this is playing out.
It really is sad.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)are not a democracy.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)keep the ones they have now doing this shit they are badly mistaken.
Karma13612
(4,485 posts)for several more election cycles.
sigh
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)voters forget and they go back to old habits . . . we can't expect a candidate like Bernie every four years. Maybe Warren will be ready to run and the public will finally realize centrist democrats aren't going to do anything for them which might give her an opportunity. Bernie will have created that opportunity by going the democratic socialist route first.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)30% consider themselves Democratic. Over 40% consider themselves Independents. And voter turn out seems to get lower and lower all the time. Yes, I do believe both parties are in self destruct mode.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)because this is SOP.
this is like the crap about the DNC not registering voters. they have typically never done this- you all have overactive imaginations.
one uneducated person makes a Youtube video complaining, and everyone loses their minds. Crazy.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)to call all the runners-up for the cheer team and her not bothering to tell her daughter's rivals where the try-outs are being held.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Generic Other
(28,978 posts)LOL @ the drama. This kind of attitude is why I am not supporting your candidate.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)making a BFD out of this have never seen a script, let alone made calls. It IS silly, sorry. Same as assuming the DNC was going to do massive voter registration. People who have no knowledge or experience are making up CTs based on their odd assumptions. This reminds me of the caucus workers shocked MOM votes would shift. It is embarrassing.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)I don't stay on script. I hang up on insincere people before the script starts.
I can find my own way to the caucus.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Again, that would be pretty silly- and I think we BOTH know better.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)A month ago, I still hoped there was a chance I could back HRC. Every day, I find a new reason why I shouldn't.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)'Gross and perverted'? Because a phone banker decides not to waste time on someone who tells them they're wasting their time?
I seriously doubt every Sanders phone banker was asking every Clinton supporter if they needed directions to the polling plac.e The job is to call as many people as possible while the clock counts down, it's that simple.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)...and people told me they were voting for Hillary, I still asked if they knew where their polling place was and if they had transportation. I must be dumb
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)efficiently I guess/ Cheers to you, less phone calls, but better ones!
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Generic Other
(28,978 posts)Might as well just robo-call if you can't be polite. You aren't doing much in the way of volunteering when you can barely stand to interact with the strangers you call! Only calling to be nice to some. Just calling to annoy the heck outta the rest of us apparently. That attitude is what bugs me. And it has nothing to do with the OP's complaints. It has to do with the HRC people's lack of civility. It is "gross and perverted" as you say. Thanks for reminding the volunteers that not everyone appreciates their "tactics."
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And as you say, on election day, seconds matter. To pretend the SOP for phone bankers is anything else completly lacks integrity. How low will people go to pretend they have the moral high ground? Insulting volunteers low. It's foolish and petty.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)working with the same basic script. Everyone does this. It is a non-story whipped up by someone who fooled the reporter.
Meanwhile you just called thousands of us dedicated enough to GOTV "gross and perverted" for working in service to democracy. That is ignorant and mean spirited. Get over yourself.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Anything else just seems gross and perverted. So, put that in your hat and call it macaroni.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)a campaign job to change it, instead of hurling insults at people who work hard for both candidates. What a load of bullshit.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)I'm still helpful to people even if they're going in a different direction. If you want to continue to defend being rude and unhelpful, by all means, have at it
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)is NOT rude.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Because that's what this story is and that's what I find to be gross and a perversion of our system of how we treat other human beings.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)I find this characteristic makes me less good at sales type jobs, so although I've volunteered on several political campaigns I won't do phone banking, it's a waste of my time and campaign's resources, plus I hate talking to strangers if I can avoid it. But labeling other people as 'gross and perverted' for doing things differently from you strikes me as astonishingly self-absorbed.
To be perfectly frank, I don't trust people who are so sure of their own moral righteousness, with that attitude you're capable of any sort of injustice as long as you have a handy rationalization. I've heard enough of that shit from people who don't like me because I'm queer and think it gives them a license to take a pop at me.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)...people. I think if someone wants to know where their polling place is, I'm going to tell them and not hang up. I think there's a perversion to the system of the way we treat other human beings and the way we behave when hanging up on someone in that situation seems "ok" and normal. I also think it's gross, hence "gross and perverted".
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)See? It's not pleasant to have complete strangers swear at you, but you were perfectly willing to start doing so to defend your vision of yourself as a good person.
You also switched around from 'find out of they know where their polling place is' to 'if someone wants to know where their polling place is,' a quite different situation that has nothing to do with the alleged behavior of the phone bankers in question.
How quickly you went from telling me what a great person you are to swearing at me and changing the subject of the conversation to make yourself look good. Think about it.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Like "dude, what the fuck are you talking about?" And I'm still thinking it now
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Response to Ned_Devine (Reply #103)
Purrfessor This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Ned_Devine (Reply #103)
Purrfessor This message was self-deleted by its author.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Pisces
(5,559 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)HRC supporters feel they are entitled to every delegate everywhere.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)We were told that if we looked at the registration form and they had checked that they wanted to register Republican, we were supposed to give them the form back and tell them to mail it in themselves, and to only accept forms from those registering Democratic.
I thought the instructions were sketchy, disrespectful of voters and anti-(small d) democratic. I didn't listen to the instructions and accepted all registration cards. The person in charge reprimanded me. Whatever. I don't believe that "winning" by cheating is good for our country. And isn't that why we care about this? If we only do it to see who can win, we might as well get into baseball. 162 chances to win each and every year...
Loki
(3,825 posts)Where was the BS campaign. No information given to their caucus members or supporters and they expect the opposing campaign to give them directions? Come on, lack of organization is not Hillarys fault. Grow up. You don't want to take responsibility for your lack of organization. If I needed that info I certainly wouldn't go to my opponents to give it to me, then whine when they wouldn't, couldn't or didn't . Yea Bs supporters are going to play nice and give Hillarys delegates directions. LOL. biggest laugh of the night.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)give ANYONE directions to their caucus, or polling place, regardless of who they would vote for.
I am one of them.
Don't call me a crybaby, because I have some sense of decency!
Loki
(3,825 posts)On this board disintegrate into a disgusting display of temper tantrums by people who want their way or the highway. If BS doesn't win, I won't vote or I'll vote for Trump or every Democrat who has not endorse your candidate is a piece of shit. No longer will I sit here and act like it hasn't happened. Calling the Democrats no better than a Republican is an insult I won't take anymore. You all have become absolutists and no better than the tea party clowns.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)in a fantasy land, where one candidate who has endorsed Republican ideals, should just be tolerated, and those who want to inform people of that should sit down and shut up. They should just give up and blindly endorse the candidate of your choice.
I get it.
Loki
(3,825 posts)I've lived longer, seen more, experienced more than to believe in your little fantasy world. It's called Disney Land. I choose to live my life sanely and without stupid ideology pushed around like its the real world. It's not and just because you believe it, doesn't make it so.
I don't think that you have lived longer than I have. I have seen things that were thought to be fantasies come around in my lifetime. Perhaps you just have not been alive long enough, and/or have lived a sheltered life.
RATM435
(392 posts)brooklynite
(91,686 posts)Any campaign (including Sanders) will thank the voter and terminate the call when the voter says they're voting for someone else.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Why help to promote active involvement in the voting process when they're simply wasting your precious time?
brooklynite
(91,686 posts)wildeyed
(11,240 posts)the Clinton campaign should be responsible for giving them a ride to the polls too. Or maybe the DNC
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)And rec
wildeyed
(11,240 posts)Y'all have really never worked a campaign before, have you You ID YOUR supporters and turn them out. Not your opponent's supporters. Turning out your opponents supporter is like scoring a goal on yourself. It's a no-no, said every campaign organizer, ever.
Leontius
(2,270 posts)You don't want to vote for me fine I'm not giving my opponents voters any help that would just be stupid.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)That is not how the game is played.
Leontius
(2,270 posts)Not a smart move.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I trust you realize that's not a compliment...
wildeyed
(11,240 posts)Y'all are just very naive about how campaigns are actually run. This is standard operating procedure. Your bad if you don't understand the rules of the game you are playing. And it's not like the info is TOP SECRET. They can look it up
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And I don't view this as a "game," either. Another illustrative difference...
wildeyed
(11,240 posts)to be up to your high, high standards.
[URL=.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Enjoy your celebrations tonight (I actually mean that...).
wildeyed
(11,240 posts)Just made vague insinuations.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)That it needed to be explained is the point...
Freaked Out
(74 posts)Take it or leave it. Actually, leave the Democratic Party and join the Republican Party, where Clinton is *slightly* to the left of the three jokers on there.
I'll take Bernie, than you.
wildeyed
(11,240 posts)
Leontius
(2,270 posts)If not why?
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)The latter? Nope...we don't have polls in Oregon: it's all vote-by-mail.
OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)I live in Colorado. The party has sent numerous notifications as to caucus locations. EVERYBODY interested in going to the caucus is aware of where they are to go. I have gotten many calls and I know where to find it on the web. This is a tempest in a teapot. No one, repeat NO ONE has asked me who I plan to caucus for.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)If you don't understand the process don't try & pretend like u do.
wildeyed
(11,240 posts)What a derp. When a political reporter doesn't know something that basic, then they don't have the A-team playing, that is for sure.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Chico Man
(3,001 posts)In a rubber neck sort of way.
What a disaster some folks on this site have turned themselves into. What ugly rabid hatred. It's really quite horrible.
Freaked Out
(74 posts)from now on.
When reports are out that Bill and Hill Clinton did very dirty campaigning tonight, then the people should fully reject the Clinton and the pending dynasty.
It's over for Clinton. She has gone far enough, and the rest of the states after the 15th are NOT favorable to her.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)This is fun!
Cordy
(82 posts)where Rubio, Cruz & Trump were caucusing either. Shame they should actually move on to do the jobs they are paid to do, and not run a Chinese lottery.
Generic Other
(28,978 posts)hmmmm....does she buy "LIKES" on Facebook too? Oh yeah. Silly me. She does.
Me <---- Not impressed.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Not in a good way, but they think of more ways to turn off an potential crossovers.
Nothing is really that surprising anymore.
merrily
(45,251 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Bernie's.
Republicans do that same false knee jerk. Every time they get caught at something, they say, "Both sides do it." It's bullshit then, too.