Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:10 AM Feb 2016

I think there should be a Two Stage Primary.... One with no candidates.

I'm totally fed up with the Tiger Beat rah, rah, High Schooll Tong War bullshit of this primary.

The fucking issues have gotten lost. Just a lot of personalized crap and opportunistic marketing masquerading as positions.

Here is my Modest Proposal.

Remember that character on TV, The Unknown Comic? He got up and performed with a bag over his head?

We should have a primary primary on that basis. Coalitions would be organized to set up platforms, to "run" in this campaign. They would create pkatforms to represent competing visions of What the Democratic Party should be, what positions it should represent, what its message and agebda should be and specific goals it should pursue.

They would submit these anonymously. Then hire some actors to perform as surrogates. The Unknown Politicians. They would campaign and debate representing these platforms merely as presenters.

Voters would pick which symbolic candidate/platform they would prefer. The Results would be a binding set of requirements on all candidates.

Then politicians woukd run campaigns as to which could present these ideas in the General, and govern based on them if they win. That's Where we can indulge in the CLass Election, Cool Kid antics......The difference is that we would knowledge that thevissues and basic message and goals have already been decided.

OK I know its a ridiculous idea. But no more ridiculous than what we have now.



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

elleng

(130,895 posts)
1. I like it.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:15 AM
Feb 2016

elleng

(130,895 posts)
3. Thanks, Armstead.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:26 AM
Feb 2016

So are you, and Governor O'Malley is better than both of us.

If your suggestion were adopted, we might have a primary based on these REAL issues, with a candidate who could REALLY perform.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
6. Yes I would...I've been fed up by the substitution of....
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:41 AM
Feb 2016

.....Personality for substance in the Democratic Party for a long time.

I afmire Bernie personslly, true. But that is far overshadowed by the importance of the message and values he represents.



jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
8. I don't seem to remember much screaming from your side...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:15 AM
Feb 2016

...when Bernie ran up a 20-point victory in New Hampshire. And I'll hear even less when he scores YOOGE in Vermont.

Unfortunately for Bernie's revolution, the only ones who seem to want it are 21-year-olds who studied something you can't get a job doing, and ran up a $40,000 bill in the process. After South Carolina came in with such a huge win for Hillary, I saw all SORTS of crap...the SC primary shouldn't count because it's a red state, SC voters don't know what's good for them, SC is a virtual slave state...that Hillary won the primary because SC voters don't like Bernie's platform was never considered. Nope, the process is broken and Southerners are stupid people.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
5. A parliamentary system would dispense with a lot of that
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:41 AM
Feb 2016

Personality thing. That isn't what out constitution provides, howeve.

I disagree, however, it should be based on "presenting." That assumes what politicians say are more important than what they do. I couldn't disagree more.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
7. Lock them into positions previously chosen by voters.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:44 AM
Feb 2016

That would presumably eliminate candidatescwho are not comfortable or supportive of the agenda chosen by voters.

Anyway it's just a damn pipe dream, so not worth arguing abput

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
9. what's to stop the platforms from pandering to voters
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:30 AM
Feb 2016

i promise to give a tax refund of $5k to every voter... I promise $10k! $15k!

Voters will select the highest benefits they are promised without a way to challenge whether they are realistic

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
12. Well the realists can still sponsor the We All Die Platform
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:53 AM
Feb 2016

You can still run a platform to quash all hope and aspirations for change

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
11. I was at a Chinese New Years party on Saturday.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:14 AM
Feb 2016

I overheard two friends, both far to the left on politics, talking about how they would vastly prefer Sanders to be president instead of Clinton, but for fear of Trump, they hope Clinton gets the nomination. Because they don't pay that much attention to politics, they were surprised when I told them that polls showed Sanders doing better than Clinton against Trump. My in-laws live in Virginia and will be voting for Clinton this week. They think Sanders won't be able to get things done due to Republican obstructionism in Congress. Have they really thought that argument through? No, but these are the kinds of considerations that will leave us with a bad choice in November.

Most politicians are followers, not leaders. That's why the revolution will begin with a revolution in popular opinion. A revolution in attitudes about gays and lesbians resulted in Clinton abandoning her stupidity about gay marriage. When the revolution comes, politicians will have no choice but to follow even if they are not fine human beings like Bernie.

Sorry, this is all tangential to your OP.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
14. Where my grandson works - very large grocery store - he tells me that they are now forbidden
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:06 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:47 AM - Edit history (1)

to talk politics in the break room, but all the young people are for Bernie, the managers are for Trump, and he says that if Clinton is the Dem nominee, most are not going to bother voting, or they are going to vote for Trump and get the crash over with, not draw it out.

All the pissy little retorts in the universe won't change their attitude, because it is their skin in the game, it is them who would go to war, it is them who can't afford college, or don't want to start life with a huge debt that keeps them from buying a home or whatever. They see Hillary as just a slightly lesser evil, as the old way that got us into our current mess. None of her campaign blather reaches them, they look stuff up.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
15. Yeah, all the dishonesty coming from the Clinton camp
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:46 AM
Feb 2016

hasn't been as effective with those for whom internet searches are second nature.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I think there should be a...