2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis blows my mind too: Berine Sanders has not had a haircut since 1976!
I heard this couple say while having lunch at the four season Hotel. No reason to doubt them. I mean, regular haircuts are vital to being an effective president, right?
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Underscores the fact that he is NOT a Democrat.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,607 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Can't say it's much of an improvement but everyone needs a hobby I guess.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Sometimes I have to check to see which website I'm on.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)I would not criticize either Bernie or Hillary for either their hair or their sartorial tastes. I do not think either attest to Oval Office qualifications. Possibly thank goodness.
I would hope that a presidential election went beyond such criteria.
My best to you.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)I'm sure Trump will have something to say. And all chubby women will hate him for it.
longship
(40,416 posts)The point here is that whether or not I think Bernie's hair, or Hillary's clothes are not in the best taste, is irrelevant. I don't select a president by their hair or their clothes or their looks. (Thank goodness! Or we would have never had an Abe Lincoln, an LBJ or a HST, or maybe even James Madison -- he was really, really short!)
But yes, Hillary is a bit sartorially challenged. And Bernie is not very well coiffed. So be it.
I'll vote for the one who gets the Democratic nomination regardless of those perceived negatives.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)I am on a first name basis with all my hairs and wouldn't dream of injuring them.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)that's what I was thinking.
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)Response to youceyec (Original post)
beam me up scottie This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Relax.
There are more important things to worry about than misspellings.
To suggest that it's homophobic is pretty laughable.
Thanks for the chuckles.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The op is free to edit it, we'll see if they do.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)On Wed Feb 24, 2016, 06:49 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Given up the red baiting for this? Your Chairman Mao and Marxist ops were quite enlightening.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1330526
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Do we have to have these personal attacks? Please vote to hide this toxic post.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:07 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Do we have to have these personal attacks? I vote to hide this toxic post.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Expecting only applause for one's posts on DU is a fool's errand.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Nothing wrong with this post. The poster is simply saying that the other person is red-baiting, and there is certainly plenty of that going on.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The threads are in the op's journal, they're obviously proud of them.
Thanks, the alert stalkers lose again.
opiate69
(10,129 posts)Your post #10 got alerted on too. I'll post the results when they come in. Must be "try to nail BMUS day " at the cesspool.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They swarm the board this time of day, it's not a coincidence.
My name is on the list.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:09 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
It's an honest mistake
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1330631
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Yes feminizing a man's name is homophobic and misogynistic. And not Laughable or worthy of a "chuckle"
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:17 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just when I think that an alert couldn't be any more idiotic ... this one appears.
LEAVE IT ALONE
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't have the strength..
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No feminizing of anyone's name occurred in the alerted thread, in fact, there are no names posted at all. Smells like alert stalking!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: *sigh*
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But the alerter is right, it is homophobic to turn men's names into women's and vice versa.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)I think I have so many people on ignore now that nothing seems to make much sense anymore. I think I'll start over.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I don't blame you, I've heard DU is almost tolerable when the ignore function is applied liberally.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Hair grows at, on average, three-quarters of an inch per month. Do the math and his hair, if left uncut since 1976, would be thirty feet long. Cats would be living in it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)even old people's grey hair grows and they have to get haircuts.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)"Bernie hasn't changed his hairstyle in the last 40 years."
That I can believe...he's always looked like he does now.
that works.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)President.
Everybody knows that. You left out the most important details.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)LOL: Marco Rubio gets the most tax-subsidized hair cuts
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)mak3cats
(1,573 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Dang. Bernie is saving big bucks by never getting his haircut. Men are so lucky. Last time I had my ends trimmed it cost me $23! I could have gone to town and got it done cheaper at Supercuts, but LuAnn up by the Dollar Store does a better job, and it's important to support local folks.
youceyec
(394 posts)Shes a strong, wealthy woman. She has a right to spend her money any way she wants.
Logical
(22,457 posts)If we can talk about Secretary Clinton and her lack of driving experience I think the grooming habits of Berine Sanders is fair game as well.