Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

youceyec

(394 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:24 PM Feb 2016

This blows my mind too: Berine Sanders has not had a haircut since 1976!

I heard this couple say while having lunch at the four season Hotel. No reason to doubt them. I mean, regular haircuts are vital to being an effective president, right?

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This blows my mind too: Berine Sanders has not had a haircut since 1976! (Original Post) youceyec Feb 2016 OP
I heard that it is only since entering Congress. Wilms Feb 2016 #1
So what? I don't judge people on how often they get haircuts. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2016 #2
Given up the red baiting for this? Your Chairman Mao and Marxist ops were quite enlightening. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #3
Hippie Bashing is much more fun Armstead Feb 2016 #35
A lot of that going on lately too. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #36
I got a chuckle when I read your headline...pretty funny. /cheers. Bread and Circus Feb 2016 #4
+1 good sport! one_voice Feb 2016 #11
Too easy ... I'll refrain from taking the bait. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #5
Have you seen Hillary's clothes recently? ;-) longship Feb 2016 #6
What's with Hillary's clothes? greymattermom Feb 2016 #24
Well, I would not call Hillary chubby. longship Feb 2016 #34
If your hair doesn't grow, why have it cut? HubertHeaver Feb 2016 #7
lol Kalidurga Feb 2016 #8
I LOL'd out loud! (NT) ghostsinthemachine Feb 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #10
It's an honest mistake Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #12
I disagree, not when it keeps happening. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #13
Unreal but you did good. Wild times. I was No. 5. appalachiablue Feb 2016 #18
Oh brother, it's a personal attack to point out red baiting now? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #19
Just wait... opiate69 Feb 2016 #20
Not taking a chance, they've gotten bogus hides on others before by lying in alerts. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #21
Some very thin skins around here lately. Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #23
Not my alert, Cali Democrat didn't misspell the name, the op did. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #28
I guess I missed that. Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #30
LOL! beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #32
what the.... Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #29
Who is Berine? Never heard of her. Is she a relative of Bernie? litlbilly Feb 2016 #14
I would say your mind has been sucked, not blown...:) litlbilly Feb 2016 #15
There's no way this could be true jmowreader Feb 2016 #16
+1 impossible treestar Feb 2016 #26
What I think they actually meant was, jmowreader Feb 2016 #31
oh treestar Feb 2016 #38
Outrageously expensive haircuts, paid for by taxpayer money, are vital to being an effective Zorra Feb 2016 #17
The US Senate has a free barber shop. Article here: FSogol Feb 2016 #27
Four Season Hotel? Wow, I can't even get Motel 6 to leave the light on for me. nt PonyUp Feb 2016 #22
LOL! (eom) mak3cats Feb 2016 #25
Hillary Clinton $600 Haircut Shuts Down Elite Bergdorf Goodman Salon In New York City Zorra Feb 2016 #33
Good for her youceyec Feb 2016 #37
FFS, really? If Romney did this we would rip him. nt Logical Mar 2016 #40
Look youceyec Feb 2016 #39
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
1. I heard that it is only since entering Congress.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:25 PM
Feb 2016

Underscores the fact that he is NOT a Democrat.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
3. Given up the red baiting for this? Your Chairman Mao and Marxist ops were quite enlightening.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:27 PM
Feb 2016

Can't say it's much of an improvement but everyone needs a hobby I guess.

longship

(40,416 posts)
6. Have you seen Hillary's clothes recently? ;-)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:31 PM
Feb 2016

I would not criticize either Bernie or Hillary for either their hair or their sartorial tastes. I do not think either attest to Oval Office qualifications. Possibly thank goodness.

I would hope that a presidential election went beyond such criteria.

My best to you.


greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
24. What's with Hillary's clothes?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:23 PM
Feb 2016

I'm sure Trump will have something to say. And all chubby women will hate him for it.

longship

(40,416 posts)
34. Well, I would not call Hillary chubby.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:52 PM
Feb 2016

The point here is that whether or not I think Bernie's hair, or Hillary's clothes are not in the best taste, is irrelevant. I don't select a president by their hair or their clothes or their looks. (Thank goodness! Or we would have never had an Abe Lincoln, an LBJ or a HST, or maybe even James Madison -- he was really, really short!)

But yes, Hillary is a bit sartorially challenged. And Bernie is not very well coiffed. So be it.

I'll vote for the one who gets the Democratic nomination regardless of those perceived negatives.

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
7. If your hair doesn't grow, why have it cut?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:32 PM
Feb 2016

I am on a first name basis with all my hairs and wouldn't dream of injuring them.

Response to youceyec (Original post)

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
12. It's an honest mistake
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:42 PM
Feb 2016

Relax.

There are more important things to worry about than misspellings.

To suggest that it's homophobic is pretty laughable.

Thanks for the chuckles.

appalachiablue

(41,131 posts)
18. Unreal but you did good. Wild times. I was No. 5.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:15 PM
Feb 2016

On Wed Feb 24, 2016, 06:49 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Given up the red baiting for this? Your Chairman Mao and Marxist ops were quite enlightening.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1330526

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Do we have to have these personal attacks? Please vote to hide this toxic post.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:07 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Do we have to have these personal attacks? I vote to hide this toxic post.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Expecting only applause for one's posts on DU is a fool's errand.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Nothing wrong with this post. The poster is simply saying that the other person is red-baiting, and there is certainly plenty of that going on.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
19. Oh brother, it's a personal attack to point out red baiting now?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

The threads are in the op's journal, they're obviously proud of them.

Thanks, the alert stalkers lose again.


 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
20. Just wait...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:19 PM
Feb 2016

Your post #10 got alerted on too. I'll post the results when they come in. Must be "try to nail BMUS day " at the cesspool.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
21. Not taking a chance, they've gotten bogus hides on others before by lying in alerts.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:22 PM
Feb 2016

They swarm the board this time of day, it's not a coincidence.

My name is on the list.



 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
23. Some very thin skins around here lately.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:23 PM
Feb 2016

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:09 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

It's an honest mistake
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1330631

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Yes feminizing a man's name is homophobic and misogynistic. And not Laughable or worthy of a "chuckle"

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:17 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just when I think that an alert couldn't be any more idiotic ... this one appears.

LEAVE IT ALONE
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't have the strength..
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No feminizing of anyone's name occurred in the alerted thread, in fact, there are no names posted at all. Smells like alert stalking!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: *sigh*

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
28. Not my alert, Cali Democrat didn't misspell the name, the op did.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:33 PM
Feb 2016

But the alerter is right, it is homophobic to turn men's names into women's and vice versa.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
30. I guess I missed that.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:36 PM
Feb 2016

I think I have so many people on ignore now that nothing seems to make much sense anymore. I think I'll start over.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
16. There's no way this could be true
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

Hair grows at, on average, three-quarters of an inch per month. Do the math and his hair, if left uncut since 1976, would be thirty feet long. Cats would be living in it.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
31. What I think they actually meant was,
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:37 PM
Feb 2016

"Bernie hasn't changed his hairstyle in the last 40 years."

That I can believe...he's always looked like he does now.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
17. Outrageously expensive haircuts, paid for by taxpayer money, are vital to being an effective
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:04 PM
Feb 2016

President.

Everybody knows that. You left out the most important details.

FSogol

(45,481 posts)
27. The US Senate has a free barber shop. Article here:
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:33 PM
Feb 2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/you-can-still-get-a-taxpayer-subsidized-haircut-at-the-senate-barbershop-but-manicures-are-out/

LOL: Marco Rubio gets the most tax-subsidized hair cuts

According to an analysis by The Fix's indispensable Philip Bump, Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, and Marco Rubio burned through the most cash in the past year.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
33. Hillary Clinton $600 Haircut Shuts Down Elite Bergdorf Goodman Salon In New York City
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:38 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-600-haircut-shuts-down-elite-bergdorf-goodman-salon-new-york-city-2029338

Dang. Bernie is saving big bucks by never getting his haircut. Men are so lucky. Last time I had my ends trimmed it cost me $23! I could have gone to town and got it done cheaper at Supercuts, but LuAnn up by the Dollar Store does a better job, and it's important to support local folks.
 

youceyec

(394 posts)
37. Good for her
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016

Shes a strong, wealthy woman. She has a right to spend her money any way she wants.

 

youceyec

(394 posts)
39. Look
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:36 AM
Feb 2016

If we can talk about Secretary Clinton and her lack of driving experience I think the grooming habits of Berine Sanders is fair game as well.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This blows my mind too: B...