2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFemale Presidential Candidate Who Was U.S. Senator, Secretary Of State Told To Be More Inspiring
NEW YORKCiting her lackluster support among young voters, campaign consultants to Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential frontrunner who has served as both a U.S. senator and secretary of state, reportedly instructed the candidate this week to be more inspiring.
Right now, voters are looking for a candidate who stands for real societal change, someone who can stir something inside them, said media advisor Jim Margolis, urging the womanwho overcame entrenched societal biases to build a successful legal career, became the first female senator elected in the state of New York, oversaw the Department of State during a period of widespread international tumult, and, if elected, would be the first female president in American historyto appear more uplifting to voters.
Many young people have completely lost faith in the political process, and they want to believe that true progress is actually possible. They want someone who embodies progressive ideals.
Margolis added that Clinton was too much a part of the establishment she spent decades breaking down barriers to enter.
http://www.theonion.com/article/female-presidential-candidate-who-was-united-state-52367
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)apart from the headline, it wasn't funny and I thought the "more inspiring" part was real. It must be me.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)..the propaganda is kind of obvious...
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I.... don't ...... think..... soooooooo
Response to Zorro (Original post)
Chasstev365 This message was self-deleted by its author.
jfern
(5,204 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)it comes across as forced, trying too hard, yelling with eyes bulging, etc.
because you can't buy or fake authenticity, by definition.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)So far, All I've heard from Hillary is be grateful for what you've got and don't make any waves.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)that voters, especially young women owe her our votes. That greatly irks me. This is a democracy, I don't owe my vote to no politician. If a politician wants votes they have to be earned.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)"The Onion, a satirical news website whose headlines alone garner thousands of shares on social media, was purchased by Univision Communications last month, who is a top donor to Hillary Clintons campaign. The move made many fans wary, carefully watching to see if anything would be slipped in that seemed too good to be satire and, to the dismay of many, a pro-Hillary, not-very-satirical article did pop up.
The title of the article read, Female Presidential Candidate Who Was United States Senator, Secretary Of State Told To Be More Inspiring. Instead of the typical Onion jabs at the presidential candidate, the article is mostly about outlining Clintons basic track record in the U.S. government. According to the article, Jim Margolis, Clintons media advisor, tells the woman who overcame entrenched societal biases to build a successful legal career, became the first female senator elected in the state of New York, oversaw the Department of State during a period of widespread international tumult, and, if elected, would be the first female president in American history to be more uplifting to voters.
Many have already called out the news outlet for posting the propaganda because it was bought by such a huge donor for Hillary. Univision co-owner Haim Saban and his wife Cheryl have given Clintons campaign over $2 million, and another $10 million to The Clinton Foundation. Saban has been quoted as saying what his three ways to be influential in American politics are; the first is through political donations, the second is by establishing think tanks, and the third is by controlling media outlets.
Its no wonder then that he has, through Univision, also purchased The Root and attempted to purchase the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times. If he had succeeded, the reach of his pro-Hillary (and pro-Israel) influence without proper context and unbiased reporting would be immeasurable.
Satire has an important place in American politics, in a country where free speech is exercised by taking light, hilarious jabs at candidates, Congress, and the White House. The problem with this newly purchased satirical news outlet is that it takes away the hilarity of political articles and turns it into a place where skeletal versions of corporate candidates past employment are made to look like huge achievements with no real jokes at all. This article has no substantial backing or a true history of Clintons ethical accountability or the big money she allows to fund her campaign.
Instead of turning readers into pro-Hillary voters, this new move in ownership and content has shown even more why its so important not to follow major news outlets who have already been bought out and controlled and instead follow alternative media to form your own opinions."
This article (Hillarys Top Donor Just Bought The Onion And Immediately Started Posting Propaganda) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TrueActivist.com.
Impedimentus
(898 posts)It sold out to the Clintons months ago. I expect the Times to restrict even further the Comments sections, which have been overwhelmingly pro-Sanders.
Krugman wants to be Treasury Secretary in a Clinton Admin.
Blow probably wants to be Press Secretary
and on and on.
The pro-Clinton slant at the Times has become a disgrace. The Gray Lady has stepped in the mud.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)about the coup in Iran, so they were mostly bought out a long time ago
basselope
(2,565 posts)Nothing "inspiring" about her becoming a Senator after being FLOTUS or secretary of state after making a deal with Obama.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Brilliant!
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)I feel plenty inspired. (And Obama's exceptional oratorial skills were NOT what made me support him over Clinton in 2008. I liked her then, too, but was looking for something different. He'd inspired me by actually writing a personal response to an email I sent him when he was my Senator. )
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)for those who missed it yesterday.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Yes, she's a symbolic powerful woman in a 'man's world' who is shooting for the highest office on the planet.
But is that the extent of aspiration? Personal power? What societal problems is she actually aspiring to solve, using the power she would gain? She promises to 'work on' or 'look into' any issue you bring up, but has no actual goals beyond 'become President'. And that's just not really all that inspirational for most Americans.