Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBlunt Amendment up for Vote This Week - Lose/Lose for the GOP
Obama's Affordable Care Act requires all health care plans to offer certain services and benefits, including birth control. Last week, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) offered a "conscience amendment," to the law, pitching it as a way to allay religious employers' qualms about providing birth control to their employees.
But Blunt's proposal doesn't just apply to religious employers and birth control. Instead, it would allow any insurer or employer, religiously affiliated or otherwise, to opt out of providing any health care services required by federal laweverything from maternity care to screening for diabetes. Employers wouldn't have to cite religious reasons for their decision; they could just say the treatment goes against their moral convictions. That exception could include almost anythingan employer could theoretically claim a "moral objection" to the cost of providing a given benefit. The bill would also allow employers to sue if state or federal regulators try to make them comply with the law.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-plan-give-bosses-moral-control-health-insurance
Greg Sargent talks to Elizabeth Warren, who walks right through it.
I am shocked that Senator Brown jumped in to support such an extreme measure, Warren told me by phone just now. This is an all new attack on health care. Any insurance company could leave anyone without health care, just when they need it most... This is an extreme attack on every one of us. It opens the door to outright discrimination. It would let insurance companies and corporations cut off pregnant women, overweight guys, older Americans, or anyone because some executive claims its part of his moral code. Maybe that wouldnt happen, but I dont want to take the chance.
And this is how Republicans can lose control of the issue.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/02/14/the_blunt_amendment_or_the_contraceptives_issue_turns.html
Very smart of Harry Reid to allow this to come up for a vote. The Blunt Amendment is co-sponsored by none other than.. yes, Scott Brown ! The GOP are self-immolating en masse this year.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1812 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blunt Amendment up for Vote This Week - Lose/Lose for the GOP (Original Post)
K Gardner
Feb 2012
OP
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)1. good rumor to start
Federal health insurance will not include drinkers, smokers or chubs under this plan.
K Gardner
(14,933 posts)2. That's not a rumor.. if this thing passes, written in the broad language
it's written, that's not a far stretch !
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)3. OR anyone who is not pretty or anyone who is not blond, or anyone less than 6': I have moral
objections to giving health care to anyone who is not a blue eyed Aryan of pure blood.
So it starts
K Gardner
(14,933 posts)4. TX4Obama's post here goes into the ramifications of this.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)5. Republicans seem to only be concerned about the freedom of employers
to make their employees slaves.