Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:44 PM Feb 2016

So, ran across this in a tweet to Jonathan Capehart

about 18 minutes ago:



Is this the kitchen sink?


It was tweeted by:

Kavin
@stylistkavin

Poor is the man who's pleasures depend on the permission of another..... #FightForHillary #ImWithHer #BlackLivesMatter Proud SuperVolunteer
Summerlin South, NV
hillaryclinton.com
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. Are these issues in the doc attached routine for all campaigns and they are only being
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:47 PM
Feb 2016

pointed out because it is Bernie?

Does anybody know the unbiased honest answer to that?

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
4. To be honest, I have
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:50 PM
Feb 2016

no idea what it's all about. Just saw that someone from the Clinton campaign in NV had tweeted the link to Jonathan Capeharts account. A new avanue of attack? Who knows....that's why I posted it here figuring someone would know something about it.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
14. maybe 100 donors out of his hundreds of thousands of donors.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 02:07 PM
Feb 2016

It wouldn't be surprising if a small percentage of donors gave to much.


Not a big deal.


leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
6. These are being pointed out because of a potential investigation
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:55 PM
Feb 2016

There won't be one if the discrepancies are explained and monies are paid back.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
15. Which is the most likely outcome here.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 02:18 PM
Feb 2016

If there are some discrepancies the money will simply will be paid back.


This is much ado about nothing.




Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
2. No. And, as the New York Times stated...
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016
Such glitches are common in political campaigns, which are required to track small donors and begin itemizing their contributions when their total reaches $200. That can be harder when donors use slightly different variations of their names or contribute from more than one address.


See BainsBane post from yesterday here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1219624

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
3. Depends on how it's played.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:49 PM
Feb 2016

My understanding is that this sort of thing isn't uncommon, nor "proof" of anything underhanded. Not everyone keeps precise track of how much they've donated and sometimes campaigns have to return money. If this gets played as SCANDAL SCANDAL OMG BERNIE IS SO CROOKED, then you'll know it's kitchen sink material.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. It will be another Rovian attack-the-strength attack. Hit Bernie on his integrity and
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:52 PM
Feb 2016

his reliance on small donors. The point is to drag him into "just another politician" territory. They've tried it before, hasn't stuck.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
13. Did you look at it?
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 02:05 PM
Feb 2016


5. Your report discloses $903.00 from Southwest Adventist University in Offsets to operating expenditures on line 20(a). Your report also discloses $331.34 from MassMutual in other receipts on line 21 of the Detailed Summary Page. Please be advised that if there are not corresponding expenditures for these entries, it may constitute an excessive or prohibited contribution. Please amend your report or provide an explanation for this apparent discrepancy.





OMG!!! How Can Bernie Ever Be Elected Now!!!!


 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
9. Probably Clinton is about to have some fundraising shenanigans exposed, so they are pushing this
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

non-story about Sanders now say they can act like there are shenanigans all around.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
10. This reeks of desperation.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

So, maybe 100 people are over the $2,700 limit for Bernie?

He has hundreds of thousands of people contributing. It would not surprise me if a tiny percentage of them have given more than the limit allows.


It is a meaningless little blip.



 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
11. I've been following his Shitter feed for 2 days. He's promised, and long anticipated follow-up piece
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

has been in the works the entire time. It appears he had to scrap the original draft, which read "not cut and dry" and is now working on a piece that turns in this direction: "Where the word of a proud photographer conflicts with the pride of an ex-wife and friends."

aside: if you've seen 2 images featuring Hillary's "Jazz Hands," those are mine

K Gardner

(14,933 posts)
12. There was an article about this yesterday.. due to the
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

astronomical amount of donations from so many individuals, tracking has been hard. Even Act Blue has sent out requests for donations so they can upgrade their systems to handle the inflow. His last FEC filing was 100,000 pages long.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So, ran across this in a ...