Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:58 PM Feb 2016

Conspiracy-loving Bernie Sanders Redditors work to uncover the Real Iowa Winner

Washington Post:

Democratic elections, even at their most transparent and even when best facilitated, lend themselves to conspiracy theories. There are all sorts of points at which one can introduce doubt, if one is so inclined: Who turned out, how the vote was tallied, how the vote was conducted, how the results were reported. So on. So forth.

When an election is instead conducted with a certain level of opaqueness or an unusual amount of complexity, and when that election ends in something close to a tie, an assumption that something untoward happened is all but inevitable. And when that happens during a political campaign in which one candidate has a massive amount of support on the conspiracy Petri dish that is Reddit -- well...

In the wake of Iowa's caucuses last week, some fans of Donald Trump first suggested that Microsoft threw the race to help Marco Rubio. Later, Trump himself implied that he came in second because Ted Cruz cheated. Each of these is easily dismissed, should one wish to accede to rationality.

On the Democratic side, though, the race was much closer.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conspiracy-loving Bernie Sanders Redditors work to uncover the Real Iowa Winner (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2016 OP
Another anything but the issues thread. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #1
+420 Their desperation is tactile berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #3
cut the bull, your own crowd is not on your holier than thou "substantive/issues" pretend agenda Sheepshank Feb 2016 #11
*zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz* beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #13
so then we agree, this type of comment is without any substance and you'll refrain in the future? Sheepshank Feb 2016 #16
we should post nothing but threads about Hillary supporters 24/7! m-lekktor Feb 2016 #14
It's like they don't even have a candidate. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #15
Cut the bullcrap. Have you look at the front page of DUP lately? Sheepshank Feb 2016 #18
Does anyone else hear an angry buzzing sound? Must be a gnat or something. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #19
That particular bug was zapped n/t Sheepshank Feb 2016 #20
Ugly NowSam Feb 2016 #2
Of course, anything but a landslide win for Sanders is clearly fraud KingFlorez Feb 2016 #4
Your comment is sarcastic and pointless. earthshine Feb 2016 #10
yeah. Take cameras to the polls a BS supporter suggested. Was that you? n/t Sheepshank Feb 2016 #12
More noise on this thread. earthshine Feb 2016 #21
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #23
Please continue with your ambiguous, vacuous, sarcasm. You make a fool of yourself for all to see. earthshine Feb 2016 #24
"the conspiracy Petri dish that is Reddit" HA, true. bettyellen Feb 2016 #5
I know. I remember all those conspiracies in 2000 when Democrats just wouldn't accept Bush's win. Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #6
That term and slur , CT was invented and promoted by the CIA Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #8
Exactly Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #9
Des Moines Register calls for audit of Iowa results: 'Something smells in the Democratic Party' think Feb 2016 #7
FIXED IT: Democracy-loving Bernie Sanders Redditors work to uncover the Real Iowa Winner Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #17
... Alfresco Feb 2016 #22
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
16. so then we agree, this type of comment is without any substance and you'll refrain in the future?
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:06 PM
Feb 2016

Or probably not.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
15. It's like they don't even have a candidate.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:37 PM
Feb 2016

Every single thread is either a hit piece on Bernie or his supporters. Are there really no positive articles about Hillary?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
18. Cut the bullcrap. Have you look at the front page of DUP lately?
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:16 PM
Feb 2016

talk about hit pieces. Non substantive hit pieces against Hillary at a rate of 10:1 for negative hit pieces against Bernie. And no, they are not predominantly about issues.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
2. Ugly
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:02 PM
Feb 2016

To label someone who has questions about a really close election as a conspiracy theorist which these days means crazy.

It is not crazy to have these doubts. Those who are hanging this label on doubters are schoolyard bullies. They are attempting to intimate and it isn't working but it does reveal much about the bullies.

Response to earthshine (Reply #21)

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
8. That term and slur , CT was invented and promoted by the CIA
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:13 PM
Feb 2016

In the 60s when people started looking at the facts and data of the Warren commission............. geez........... don't question authority citizen

 

think

(11,641 posts)
7. Des Moines Register calls for audit of Iowa results: 'Something smells in the Democratic Party'
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:12 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/des-moines-register-audit-iowa-results-218731

Hmm... I wonder where those "conspiracy lovers" got the idea something might be wrong with the results of the Democratic primary in Iowa...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Conspiracy-loving Bernie ...