2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumConspiracy-loving Bernie Sanders Redditors work to uncover the Real Iowa Winner
Washington Post:When an election is instead conducted with a certain level of opaqueness or an unusual amount of complexity, and when that election ends in something close to a tie, an assumption that something untoward happened is all but inevitable. And when that happens during a political campaign in which one candidate has a massive amount of support on the conspiracy Petri dish that is Reddit -- well...
In the wake of Iowa's caucuses last week, some fans of Donald Trump first suggested that Microsoft threw the race to help Marco Rubio. Later, Trump himself implied that he came in second because Ted Cruz cheated. Each of these is easily dismissed, should one wish to accede to rationality.
On the Democratic side, though, the race was much closer.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)all this, and more just from one thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1208009
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1208158
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1207822
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1207837
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Or probably not.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Every single thread is either a hit piece on Bernie or his supporters. Are there really no positive articles about Hillary?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)talk about hit pieces. Non substantive hit pieces against Hillary at a rate of 10:1 for negative hit pieces against Bernie. And no, they are not predominantly about issues.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)To label someone who has questions about a really close election as a conspiracy theorist which these days means crazy.
It is not crazy to have these doubts. Those who are hanging this label on doubters are schoolyard bullies. They are attempting to intimate and it isn't working but it does reveal much about the bullies.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)earthshine
(1,642 posts)Close elections need to be scrutinized.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)earthshine
(1,642 posts)Your comment is sarcastic, pointless, and irrelevant.
Response to earthshine (Reply #21)
Post removed
earthshine
(1,642 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)In the 60s when people started looking at the facts and data of the Warren commission............. geez........... don't question authority citizen
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Accept what your told and move on. Nothing to see here.
think
(11,641 posts)Hmm... I wonder where those "conspiracy lovers" got the idea something might be wrong with the results of the Democratic primary in Iowa...