Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:52 PM Jan 2016

Why did the League of Conservation Voters endorse Hillary over Bernie?

that's the real issue, not this logo nonsense.

Her lifetime score is 82% versus Bernie's 95% lifetime, and his track record is much longer.

Was someone paid off? Or is there another explanation for this?

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did the League of Conservation Voters endorse Hillary over Bernie? (Original Post) gyroscope Jan 2016 OP
An insider's game HassleCat Jan 2016 #1
Yeah, her connections to the fracking and offshore drilling industry gyroscope Jan 2016 #6
My thoughts as well. cheapdate Jan 2016 #9
Because they thought she would win. (nt) enough Jan 2016 #2
And if she wins, it could be very bad for the environment gyroscope Jan 2016 #10
Why is everything a conspiracy if it is for Hillary, but not Bernie? still_one Jan 2016 #3
Paranoia is really deep. Hoyt Jan 2016 #11
Its not angrychair Jan 2016 #15
Because if you go against the establishment and they win, then you could be punished. reformist2 Jan 2016 #4
This right here. frylock Jan 2016 #17
People don't want to piss of the Clintons. nt m-lekktor Jan 2016 #21
The founder and director of it is a long-time Clinton crony Armstead Jan 2016 #5
Also... malokvale77 Jan 2016 #20
Oh shit I remember that name . No wonder. nt m-lekktor Jan 2016 #22
Because they think she can win the general and he can't (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #7
The scorecard is only based off her Senate voting record tammywammy Jan 2016 #8
The LCV statement is intentionally dishonest - the bipartisan US/China pact was Kerry's, not HRC's karynnj Jan 2016 #16
The real issue is the dishonest use of the logo pandr32 Jan 2016 #12
Because they know she can win a general election... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #13
yeah like she did in 2008. m-lekktor Jan 2016 #23
Leadership 'you scratch my back, i scratch yours" over membership polling and 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #14
IMO a lot of groups are making these endorsements way to jwirr Jan 2016 #18
John Podesta malokvale77 Jan 2016 #19
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. An insider's game
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:55 PM
Jan 2016

Lobbyists tend to side with people they know will be hospitable to their sales pitches. LCV figures Clinton is a better bet for getting what they want, since she is connected.

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
6. Yeah, her connections to the fracking and offshore drilling industry
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:01 PM
Jan 2016

ought to be just terrific for the environment. lets give her an endorsement




Hillary Clinton Attending Fundraiser With Pro-Keystone XL Lobbyist
Clinton recently stated opposition to the pipeline
Jan 12, 2016
http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-attending-fundraiser-with-pro-keystone-xl-lobbyist/

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
10. And if she wins, it could be very bad for the environment
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:05 PM
Jan 2016

given how much she is in bed with the fossil fuel industry.

Win for Hillary, loss for the environment. Does that make sense to anyone.

angrychair

(8,698 posts)
15. Its not
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:12 PM
Jan 2016

Doesn't change the point. His voting record on things that matter most to LCV is longer and he has a higher eating from them. He opposed KXL from the beginning. He opposed giving federal land for more fracking.. He has spoken for years and passionately about the dangers of climate change.
I think when measured against past endorsements she is a good second but not a first. Not a conspiracy, just how it is supposed to work.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
4. Because if you go against the establishment and they win, then you could be punished.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:00 PM
Jan 2016

The consequences of going against Bernie are much less risky.
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
5. The founder and director of it is a long-time Clinton crony
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:00 PM
Jan 2016

Google the organization and Carol Browner. It will become immediately apparent.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
8. The scorecard is only based off her Senate voting record
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:02 PM
Jan 2016

They also took into account things she did while Secretary.

http://www.lcv.org/media/press-releases/LCV-Action-Fund-Endorses-Hillary-Clinton-for-President.html

Hillary Clinton has a long history of strong environmental leadership. As a Senator, Clinton supported a number of important climate and clean energy bills, including reducing carbon and other pollutants from power plants, repealing Big Oil tax handouts, and investing in renewable energy. Clinton also proposed several environmental justice initiatives. As Secretary of State, she made climate change a top priority. Clinton appointed the first-ever Special Envoy for Climate Change who serves as the Administration’s point person for climate negotiations, including the recent, historic bilateral climate agreement with China and formed the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, a partnership with dozens of other countries to reduce short-lived climate pollutants like black carbon and methane. In 2009, Clinton made a breakthrough announcement committing the U.S. to help jointly mobilize $100 billion by 2020 to help communities across the world deal with the ravages of climate change. This commitment helped reinvigorate stalled negotiations and led to an agreement in Copenhagen.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
16. The LCV statement is intentionally dishonest - the bipartisan US/China pact was Kerry's, not HRC's
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jan 2016

The lack of a date on that , explains why it is oddly out of chronological order. It hides that the bilateral relationship with China was done in 2014. That effort started when John Kerry spoke to the Chinese, found that they were open to working with him - not surprising as Kerry worked with the Chinese in the Bali conference in 2007. Obama okayed negotiations and Kerry himself played a key role. It is true that Todd Stern was very important to this effort, but without Kerry those negotiations would not have happened and for those entire negotiations he reported to Kerry, not Clinton.

Remember the debate where HRC spoke of hunting down the Chinese ... The agreement at Copenhagen was considered a disappointment to most in the diplomatic community. When she left as Secretary of State, the common wisdom is that NOTHING much would happen diplomatically on climate change. The reason - the Chinese were not working with us.

The Secretary who made climate change a signature issue is JOHN KERRY, who had worked on it for decades. When he was asked to be secretary, he told Obama that he wanted climate change to be as much an issue he addressed as women and children's issues were for Obama.

pandr32

(11,581 posts)
12. The real issue is the dishonest use of the logo
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:06 PM
Jan 2016

But nice try. This is not the first dishonest tactic either--in fact, it is starting to look like business as usual--all is fair in love and war--and a faux revolution as well, right?

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
13. Because they know she can win a general election...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jan 2016

and so all of their hard work and progress won't be for nothing?

I don't think they endorsed solely on Votes....
as she's been First Lady, and Secretary of state....
and prior to that First lady of Arkansas....
etc.., etc..., etc...? just guessing.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
14. Leadership 'you scratch my back, i scratch yours" over membership polling and
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:10 PM
Jan 2016

how the candidates are actually rated by the group.

That's been an issue all along. Groups that poll members, endorse Bernie. Others? Not so much.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
18. IMO a lot of groups are making these endorsements way to
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:25 PM
Jan 2016

early and are basing them on presumed electability. They are not looking at the issues at all. They are running in fear that Trump will win.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why did the League of Con...