Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:32 PM Jan 2016

Hillary Clinton’s Iowa Closing Argument Ad Is Also Mighty White

With the Iowa caucuses looming on the near horizon, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are not just duking it out with cannonfire about gun control, health care, and slavery reparations, they’re also submitting their “closing arguments” in the form of a couple of new ads that will run in Iowa in the coming weeks. Sanders’ opening bid is a Simon and Garfunkel-fueled bit of goosebumpery that’s been criticized by David Brock for being too white:

David Brock, a longtime Clinton supporter who founded the “super PAC” backing her, told The Associated Press on Thursday that the advertising presented a “bizarre” image of America focused on white voters. Mr. Brock also said the ad was a “significant slight to the Democratic base,” according to the news agency.

“From this ad it seems black lives don’t matter much to Bernie Sanders,” Mr. Brock told The Associated Press.

Let’s have a look, shall we?

<snip>

http://www.mediaite.com/online/hillary-clintons-iowa-closing-argument-ad-is-also-mighty-white/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton’s Iowa Closing Argument Ad Is Also Mighty White (Original Post) cali Jan 2016 OP
Wow, Brock really never did lose the slime, did he? arcane1 Jan 2016 #1
Brock is a nasty piece of work Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #4
God I can't stand David Brock that POS Dretownblues Jan 2016 #2
Obama's Iowa ads were pretty much white Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #3
FWIW Iowa is not Ohio, and Ohio isn't Iowa either. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #6
And Idaho isn't either of them. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #10
Lol, yes indeed! emulatorloo Jan 2016 #12
David Brock is scum. TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author KittyWampus Jan 2016 #7
Hillary to Brock: "Oh David don't say those things." (nudge nudge, wink wink) Armstead Jan 2016 #8
Kick cali Jan 2016 #9
Brock can go to Hell. azmom Jan 2016 #11
I'm sure I saw one darker skinned person in Hillary's ad Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #13
Why is super pac used singularly? hootinholler Jan 2016 #14
hmmm ... ebayfool Jan 2016 #15

Response to cali (Original post)

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
8. Hillary to Brock: "Oh David don't say those things." (nudge nudge, wink wink)
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 07:43 PM
Jan 2016

and of course she never showed him her ad, which has fewer faces of POC than Bernie's

Nanjeanne

(4,973 posts)
13. I'm sure I saw one darker skinned person in Hillary's ad
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 02:57 PM
Jan 2016

That proves black lives matter to Hillary, doesn't it David?

Honestly, there are legitimate things her campaign could be discussing - focusing on her positives (at least as far as they see them). Dusting off her playbook from 2008 when that didn't work out too well for her is kind of stupid isn't it?

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
14. Why is super pac used singularly?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jan 2016
"who founded the “super PAC” backing her"

How about who founded A super pac, I'm pretty sure a lil birdy mentioned there are more than one.

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
15. hmmm ...
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jan 2016
https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/12/03/behind-the-clinton-campaign-dark-money-allies/

The Clinton campaign itself is Correct the Record’s single biggest contributor, giving more than $275,000 to the super PAC.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/

snip -

Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to work in tight conjunction with an independent rapid-response group financed by unlimited donations, another novel form of political outsourcing that has emerged as a dominant practice in the 2016 presidential race.

On Tuesday, Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton rapid-response operation, announced it was splitting off from its parent American Bridge and will work in coordination with the Clinton campaign as a stand-alone super PAC. The group’s move was first reported by the New York Times.

That befuddled many campaign finance experts, who noted that super PACs, by definition, are political committees that solely do independent expenditures, which cannot be coordinated with a candidate or political party. Several said the relationship between the campaign and the super PAC would test the legal limits.

But Correct the Record believes it can avoid the coordination ban by relying on a 2006 Federal Election Commission regulation that declared that content posted online for free, such as blogs, is off limits from regulation. The “Internet exemption” said that such free postings do not constitute campaign expenditures, allowing independent groups to consult with candidates about the content they post on their sites. By adopting the measure, the FEC limited its online jurisdiction to regulating paid political ads.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s Iowa Cl...