Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:30 PM Jan 2016

WTF is this crap Hillary? Shopping around a doc saying Bernie is pro-Communist?

Really? REALLY?
You wanted a war on your hands, you got it. You just opened up a whole treasure chest of crap from your past that is now fair game. You have more baggage than Samsonite.



Sanders smeared as communist sympathiser as Clinton allies sling mud
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/22/bernie-sanders-communist-sympathiser-hillary-clinton-us-election-2016
A war of words between Hillary Clinton and Sanders has erupted in recent days as polls show him in the lead among voters in New Hampshire and Iowa

The dossier, prepared by opponents of Sanders and passed on to The Guardian by a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat”, alleges that Sanders “sympathized with the USSR during the Cold War” because he went on a trip there to visit a twinned city while he was mayor of Burlington.

Similar “associations with communism” in Cuba are catalogued alongside a list of quotes about countries ranging from China to Nicaragua in a way that supporters regard as bordering on the McCarthyite rather than fairly reflecting his views.

Sanders has insisted on many occasions this year that his own philosophy of democratic socialism is very different to that of authoritarian regimes, and much more in keeping with the tradition of American reformers such as Franklin D Roosevelt.

The Vermont senator has also ridiculed suggestions – repeated by the attack dossier – that his policies would see nationalisation of US industries.

“I don’t believe government should take over the grocery store down the street or own the means of production,” he said during a speech at Georgetown University. “But I do believe that the middle class and the working families who produce the wealth of America deserve a decent standard of living and that their incomes should go up, not down. I do believe in private companies that thrive and invest and grow in America, companies that create jobs here, rather than companies that are shutting down in America and increasing their profits by exploiting low-wage labor abroad.”
197 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTF is this crap Hillary? Shopping around a doc saying Bernie is pro-Communist? (Original Post) pinebox Jan 2016 OP
I don't doubt this is true, but... HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #1
Time to talk about the Clinton Foundation. azmom Jan 2016 #2
the pay for play scam they have going? Okay. :D:D:D roguevalley Jan 2016 #123
Not much different than branding Clinton a Third Way, Neo-Liberal, Oligarch, or some such. Hoyt Jan 2016 #3
because she is pinebox Jan 2016 #8
so, you believe everything you read on Kos. got it. riversedge Jan 2016 #28
So you can't debunk anything? pinebox Jan 2016 #44
An hour has passed and nothing. retrowire Jan 2016 #70
yup. they're on it. restorefreedom Jan 2016 #77
What I hate about the lies her group is telling draa Jan 2016 #90
Some...a very small/few supported her...there are others that still post against Hillary on Benghazi Sheepshank Jan 2016 #103
Bullshit. Benghazi was bullshit and we all know it. blackspade Jan 2016 #114
Then perhaps you can tell your "brothers in arms" to drop that crappola next time it comeS N/T up Sheepshank Jan 2016 #122
"brothers in arms"....Interesting that you would use that term. blackspade Jan 2016 #149
I will let you know next time I see a Benghazi post used to slam Hillary Sheepshank Jan 2016 #151
Some of you need to stop conflating an unsecured server with Benghazi. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #157
what makes you think you are in any position to tell anyone to learn anything? Sheepshank Jan 2016 #160
Hillary and her supporters are burning a lot of bridges. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #120
This: AlbertCat Jan 2016 #143
HillBill Is A Sinkin Fast... And It Is ENTIRELY HER DOING! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #166
I agree! n/t cui bono Jan 2016 #170
a very small/few supported her. AlbertCat Jan 2016 #140
your post appear to be the very epitome of everything you complained about haa haa haaa n/t Sheepshank Jan 2016 #152
Link? merrily Jan 2016 #154
Where? Links to DUers using Benghazi against Hillary? cui bono Jan 2016 #169
I just will not waste my time on sillyness. bye riversedge Jan 2016 #159
lol [x] Wrecked. [ ] Not wrecked. pinebox Jan 2016 #161
I believe what I see with my own two eyes! n/t RoccoR5955 Jan 2016 #66
Those who use insult where retort would excell use insult because they are bereft of better argument Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #68
No, because we can watch her in action. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #156
Absolutely MissDeeds Jan 2016 #136
Which means that you want to stay away from Hillary.... daleanime Jan 2016 #11
Those are true statements hobbit709 Jan 2016 #15
Sanders will easily get that... CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #17
I'm concerned about the general election. Hoyt Jan 2016 #38
Me too. tecelote Jan 2016 #55
I am too, seriously. navarth Jan 2016 #60
As I said, I don't think Sanders is a commie, nor does in matter. I don't think Clinton called him Hoyt Jan 2016 #82
I just don't see much good in exaggeration. navarth Jan 2016 #111
Egg-jazz-err-a-shun. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #131
Don't be. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #182
Yeah Kall Jan 2016 #184
This Communist bullshit is beyond the pale... Punkingal Jan 2016 #21
Difference being Hillary is all those things AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #27
uh....she *is* DLC/Third Way Roland99 Jan 2016 #63
Well, I guess all those Democratic third wayers in New York were wrong electing her. Obama was wrong Hoyt Jan 2016 #79
Many things Obama has done wrong or forgotten about or done a 180 on from his original campaign. Roland99 Jan 2016 #98
He's been a good Prez and he was supported by good Democrats. Unfortunately, some Democrats feel Hoyt Jan 2016 #113
He wasn't good enough. We can do much, much better. cui bono Jan 2016 #172
Did you see the price of oil? We must have war with Iran. Oil would be over $100/barrel next day. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #190
Obama was wrong tapping her for Secretary of State Kalidurga Jan 2016 #189
And it is the DLC and its remnants that are MORE tied to Stalin than Bernie ever was... cascadiance Jan 2016 #138
The difference is Old Codger Jan 2016 #88
Well, since her husband, whatsisname... gregcrawford Jan 2016 #125
Geebus. Are you kidding? It's very different. Those things are true. merrily Jan 2016 #153
Truth is hard. cui bono Jan 2016 #173
Truth is hard; false equivalencies are easy. merrily Jan 2016 #186
Either it's true or it isn't and if it isn't... why are they saying so? sibelian Jan 2016 #193
Slimy and they've been shopping around crap cali Jan 2016 #4
This says it all passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #84
Who needs guess-work? Wilms Jan 2016 #5
It's worse than stupid pet tricks Duckfan Jan 2016 #59
Stupid humor or stupid human? cui bono Jan 2016 #174
While Snopes denies it, there's always that issue of the 45 dead people known to them. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #6
Considering the pretty consistant -- Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2016 #7
ok. n/t zappaman Jan 2016 #9
He also allowed fluoridation of the water while mayor of Burlington DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #10
. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #37
They are tryng to poison my precious bodily fluids. pangaia Jan 2016 #96
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #12
Are you now or have you ever been, courtesty of the Hillary campaign. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #13
Those turbine blades must be hitting 100,000 rpm again. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #14
next up, a scary image of the South under RED OCCUPATION MisterP Jan 2016 #16
Remember Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #48
Brock: "oh no, McCain's a commie now!" MisterP Jan 2016 #50
That would be fitting Mnpaul Jan 2016 #162
hence-a their outrageous accents! MisterP Jan 2016 #163
LMFAO.. Love it Fumesucker Jan 2016 #180
Is This The "Joseph McCarthy" Era Again? WTF? fredamae Jan 2016 #18
what do you think Karl rove and his kind will do to Sanders, should by riversedge Jan 2016 #25
So Hillary is like a Rove shit slinging test bed? AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #30
No i did not say that. You did and shame on you for saying it. riversedge Jan 2016 #33
That is essentially what you are saying AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #42
Stop making stuff up -what you imagine I said. Enough bye riversedge Jan 2016 #52
You implied it Bradical79 Jan 2016 #117
Oh, come on... take your own advice and buck up. cui bono Jan 2016 #177
Might have well said it because cannabis_flower Jan 2016 #69
Hillary is worse. She does it to her own party members. morningfog Jan 2016 #53
Which is really short-sighted beltanefauve Jan 2016 #86
What do you think Karl Rove and his kind will fredamae Jan 2016 #32
So we should be thanking Clinton TM99 Jan 2016 #46
only in my mind could that crap what you just said be conjured up. riversedge Jan 2016 #54
Ok then, we should criticize TM99 Jan 2016 #81
Hill supporters beltanefauve Jan 2016 #91
Yeah, me too. TM99 Jan 2016 #95
Rove's got nothing on HIllary. She's ten times worse. morningfog Jan 2016 #51
Why give the Republicans ammo? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #57
'cos no Bernie supporter has done that to Hillary....what a crock of shit. n/t Sheepshank Jan 2016 #118
It's okay to be evil because you see the other side as evil? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #121
This close to elections, is don't serve anyone to act as a door mat. n/t Sheepshank Jan 2016 #124
I don't do this often but: WTF? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #127
So you agree with her red baiting? You like McCarthyism? cui bono Jan 2016 #179
First of all, this is what Hillary herself is doing, not a supporter. cui bono Jan 2016 #181
Let fucking Rove do what he will. pangaia Jan 2016 #99
Sounds like Hilary's kind are already at it. GeorgeGist Jan 2016 #107
what do you think Karl rove and his kind will do to Sanders, AlbertCat Jan 2016 #144
So you're rationalizing Hillary using disgusting right wing tactics that Rove would use? cui bono Jan 2016 #175
Well, *one* of the two candidates supported Barry Goldwater. EOM The Green Manalishi Jan 2016 #94
Except Barry was too smart for today's GOP ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #137
Poor Bernie supporters! Can't stand even the slightest criticism of Bernie. beaglelover Jan 2016 #19
Did you notice that this OP and the replies are posted in GDP, hardly a safe place. Autumn Jan 2016 #29
Calling him a communist sympathizer is hardly "slight criticism" and you know it. arcane1 Jan 2016 #36
So you are fine with 50s style right wing McCarthyism from your candidate? AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #39
I won't. beaglelover Jan 2016 #40
Stop making stuff up and looking foolish. It is not from Hillary and you know it. bye riversedge Jan 2016 #58
It's brock, no doubt Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #85
its her surrogates AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #167
One year from today... 99Forever Jan 2016 #47
Watching the guys with the big butterfly nets will be even better. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #75
Run fast... 99Forever Jan 2016 #106
ah.. because Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #49
There's only one safe place here, and we're not allowed in it. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #71
Bernie says it, it gets pointed out and his supporters go insane. Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #126
How do you stand looking in a mirror? ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #133
Jury results: merrily Jan 2016 #147
Keep lovin' your Koch brothers' commie money funded DLC roots why don't ya! cascadiance Jan 2016 #139
No, we're just tired of the lies your candidate MissDeeds Jan 2016 #142
Red baiting and McCarthyism are hardly slight criticisms. cui bono Jan 2016 #176
You think this is a "slightest" criticism. mikehiggins Jan 2016 #183
It's not a criticism. It's just bollocks. sibelian Jan 2016 #194
We knew it was coming, folks! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #20
It will backfire spectacularly Mufaddal Jan 2016 #22
It will backfire spectacularly AlbertCat Jan 2016 #146
Yeah I've seen Bernie's Soviet flag pulled out several times this week Autumn Jan 2016 #23
HRC has gone off the rails. glinda Jan 2016 #24
Hillary slinging mud. May be her only chance at this point. Broward Jan 2016 #26
Has she hit bottom, yet? last1standing Jan 2016 #31
Hell no. cali Jan 2016 #34
She did, but then she found a shovel. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #112
Like the ones she gave Iowans in 2008? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #158
RED BAITING Shrillary? That's what you got now? Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #35
Just a head's up: If you want to stay here for awhile -- Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2016 #41
I fully expect to be banned, and probably today. Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #45
yeah, I detest her politics & behavior but let's leave "shrill" and "pantsuit" out of it zazen Jan 2016 #76
There's plenty of valid criticism beltanefauve Jan 2016 #93
Zero connection to Clinton. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #43
Every day I like her even less Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #56
Her internal polling must be something to see. Bernie must be winning by more than we think he is. Vinca Jan 2016 #61
Since the gloves are off Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #62
They must be petrified they will lose Iowa. . Peregrine Took Jan 2016 #64
Fuck her Campaign of Lies! SoapBox Jan 2016 #65
They must be VERY worried that they will lose. RoccoR5955 Jan 2016 #67
this typical hilary smear machine. imagine if we allow her the power desires bowens43 Jan 2016 #72
People with shady buddies ought to be very careful about starting guilt by association. JoeyT Jan 2016 #73
Hillary will NEVER EVER get my vote !!! urbuddha Jan 2016 #74
Lots of people feel the way 840high Jan 2016 #104
I was withholding that decision about holding my nose, but this crap doesn't make it easier EndElectoral Jan 2016 #109
Your post needed this ... JoePhilly Jan 2016 #119
They really want to go there? sarge43 Jan 2016 #78
definitely fan hitting time restorefreedom Jan 2016 #97
And the sad thing about this is INdemo Jan 2016 #80
Whatever It Takes(tm) arcane1 Jan 2016 #92
its ON,clintons restorefreedom Jan 2016 #83
and she don't understand why Bernie's numbers are rising. . . B Calm Jan 2016 #87
Did she object when Walmart was sourcing some of its goods from China closeupready Jan 2016 #89
I suppose it's only fair to sling mud back..... I would not vote for a doormat Sheepshank Jan 2016 #100
prefer Hillary to be a doormat AlbertCat Jan 2016 #148
of course the mysoginistic crowd would love all women to be doormats n/t Sheepshank Jan 2016 #150
Ugly. A preview zentrum Jan 2016 #101
Bernie is a socialist? Pro-communist? abelenkpe Jan 2016 #102
Who else visited the USSR in 1988? Reagan; 125,000 American citizens; 20 major corporations spedtr90 Jan 2016 #105
I went and studied there in 76. I ended up teaching there after the USSR fell. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #135
Shades of McCarthyism... EndElectoral Jan 2016 #108
I would say that is unbelievable from a Democrat..... blackspade Jan 2016 #110
Next they'll claim he's Nader. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #115
I got news for ya: november3rd Jan 2016 #116
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #128
Sanders “sympathized with the USSR during the Cold War” AlbertCat Jan 2016 #129
Keep it up, Hillary MissDeeds Jan 2016 #130
"passed on to the Guardian by a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat”" JTFrog Jan 2016 #132
Of course, how else to keep the money flowing in? Also, is oppo research news to these guys? synergie Jan 2016 #185
If she gets the nomination, who will vote for her? emsimon33 Jan 2016 #134
Deja vu Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #141
meet me at the book burning! Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #145
her transparent campaign gets worse every day. my friend supports her but she hates her campaign. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #155
All respect now gone.... glinda Jan 2016 #164
The more they red-bait they more Millennials will flock to Bernie. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #165
Well if there is an actual doc, LeatherSofa Jan 2016 #168
Doubtful pinebox Jan 2016 #187
Really? > a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat” Lucinda Jan 2016 #171
The guy just got off vacation for constantly dumping right wing shit in this forum. JTFrog Jan 2016 #192
I've been away from DU for a while and it's amazing how much has changed. Lucinda Jan 2016 #195
Here's a Clinton statement about Red-baiting (blast from the past): " A pathetic ploy by a desperate kath Jan 2016 #178
She's been seeing her polling amongst older voters start to slip Kentonio Jan 2016 #188
Funny, given the pro-Putin stance of the other side! Helen Borg Jan 2016 #197
Kicked and recommended! I am sick of this bullshit. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #191
Perhaps we all are Democratic Communists after all... Helen Borg Jan 2016 #196
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Not much different than branding Clinton a Third Way, Neo-Liberal, Oligarch, or some such.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jan 2016

I don't think Sanders is a communist, and really don't care if he is. Of course, the extra 5 or 10% he needs to attract to win the GE (above his base and those like me that will support the nominee) may well care. I'd like to avoid another McGovern/Dukakis landslide at this time.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
8. because she is
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jan 2016

Straight up.

Hillary is just that. A neo-lib Third Way Dem.
Go read http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/7/19/1403488/-Anti-Capitalist-Meetup-How-Neoliberal-is-Hillary-Clinton

As far as your "I want to avoid a landslide", then don't nominate Hillary! Bernie does better in general election.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
44. So you can't debunk anything?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jan 2016

We'll wait but most of us wouldn't want to be dust and bones.
Do it. Go ahead.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
70. An hour has passed and nothing.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jan 2016

Man, I love it when Hillary supporters get smoked like that.

Let's wait a little longer, I'm sure they're working on that debunking.

draa

(975 posts)
90. What I hate about the lies her group is telling
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jan 2016

is us Berners supported her during the Benghazi crap without question. I've defended her from attacks when I had no obligation to do so. Just because. Her supporters have ignored all of that.

It's head up ass thinking on their part. I will no longer defend her within my family and friends and if anything I might encourage more from them. I'm seriously tired of the lies from that group and there's no way I'm coming to her rescue again.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
103. Some...a very small/few supported her...there are others that still post against Hillary on Benghazi
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:53 PM
Jan 2016

so don't be pulling the martyr crappola.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
122. Then perhaps you can tell your "brothers in arms" to drop that crappola next time it comeS N/T up
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:17 PM
Jan 2016

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
149. "brothers in arms"....Interesting that you would use that term.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jan 2016

A "berniebros reference? not very subtle there friend.

But name the "brothers in arms" and I will.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
151. I will let you know next time I see a Benghazi post used to slam Hillary
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jan 2016

although I miss many since I recently decided not visit DU as much as I used to. The cesspool it has become is kinda slimy lately. I may be back to do some gloating after Super Tuesday.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
157. Some of you need to stop conflating an unsecured server with Benghazi.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jan 2016

I thought Benghazi was stupid, but I do care about an FBI investigation into a private and unsecure server that may have held national security secrets.

TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. LEARN THAT!

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
160. what makes you think you are in any position to tell anyone to learn anything?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 07:17 PM
Jan 2016

you made up some shit, ran with it and pretended it was thing. I conflated nothing, since I didn't bring it up or mention those two scenarios at any time in the history of Sheepshank on DU. Learn that.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
120. Hillary and her supporters are burning a lot of bridges.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:11 PM
Jan 2016

She is making a big mistake if she thinks she will be elected in 2016 with the kind of campaign she is running now.

She is losing friends by the minute. What a fool she is.

Her negativity is astounding.

Contrast her can't do mentality with that of Abraham Lincoln.

He helped build the railroads. He freed the slaves and fought the Civil War. He established landgrant colleges. And he did those things and more although he lost a son while in the White House.

Then think of FDR, and JFK who determined that we would go to the moon.

Hillary is a negative person. She will make a terrible president. She is controlling and wants to prevent others from dreaming. We all know how it is with dreams. We don't need to be reminded that it is difficult to achieve them and that we probably can't achieve all our dreams very quickly.

But look at the history of our country. Look at the history of us as Americans, individually and a group.

We are dream-catchers. We are a people who make our dreams into reality.

But this negative attitude that Hillary EMBODIES, that Reagan embodied, that the Bushes embodied, that is what defeats us.

I will vote for all other Democrats on my ballot, but I will never, never vote for Hillary and her negative, cut-you-down-to-size, hopelessness.

Never. My life personally has been one of fulfilling my dreams. I believe that dreams can be fulfilled.

Hillary should not be running because she is so pessimistic, so negative, it's just not what America and Americans are about.

Even Trump is not as negative about America as Hillary is. Sorry to have to say that. Trump is mean and bigoted. But he is not as can't do as Hillary.

We need a can do president. That's Bernie. And in his time as mayor in Vermont, he proved he can do difficult things.

Feel the Bern!

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
143. This:
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:44 PM
Jan 2016

"But this negative attitude that Hillary EMBODIES, that Reagan embodied, that the Bushes embodied, that is what defeats us."

And it all coincides with making/not sharing more money and power. It usually has little to do with what is needed or a good idea.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
140. a very small/few supported her.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:39 PM
Jan 2016

How do you know how many?

Where are your numbers and how did you arrive at them?

I have only seen Benghazi mentioned once since that ridiculous hearing (that, in the 1st place, was a cinch to make look foolish)....and mentioned as satire.

In another thread, someone who goes by "Gman" stated that Sanders' supporters never lifted a finger during congressional campaigns. Of course there haven't been any congressional campaigns since Sanders started running, so there weren't any "Bernie supporters" during any congressional campaigns....

The fundamentalist, cultish, knee jerk, fantasy accusations from Hillary supporters are ridiculouser and ridiculouser. Right thru the looking glass....

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
169. Where? Links to DUers using Benghazi against Hillary?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:00 AM
Jan 2016

I haven't seen that. I saw a lot of Bernie supporters standing up for her during that time. But we get "Not Good Enough, Bernie", "lily white", supporters are "white supremacists" and other slimy swiftboat pieces all the time.

Are you still not admitting that Bernie is running as a Democrat? You kept denying it even after I showed you the evidence straight from the Vermont State's website. I'll bet you've even used the s-word against him.

.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
68. Those who use insult where retort would excell use insult because they are bereft of better argument
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

It's so nasty that you just insult that poster like that. You offer no content other than you personal smear, which is of course dedicated to Hillary in a thread about her smearing people. See why your method is a losing method?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
17. Sanders will easily get that...
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:49 PM
Jan 2016

When Obama won Iowa, he was still behind in all national polls and in all state polls--every single one except NH.

We have a state-by-state primary process, as you know. It takes a few states voting, for the campaign to spread and for those national polls to fall Bernie's way.

If Bernie wins Iowa and NH, this will be an entirely different race. Bernie will be the frontrunner with a very powerful message. Hillary Clinton will be a candidate without her foundation of "inevitability."

I am not worried about Sanders. He's done better in Iowa than Obama. The latest polls show Sanders ahead of Clinton by 5 and 8. Hillary has lost 17 points in Iowa in the past seven weeks.

Hillary held steady in the fall before the 08 Iowa caucuses. She slipped a bit, and Obama was ahead by a few points going into the Iowa caucuses. But she was holding steady.

Not the case in 2016. Her campaign is crumbling like a day-old donut and Bernie is rising. If this continues, it could be a complete blow out for her in the Iowa caucuses. She lost the Iowa caucuses in 08, by 8 points. This year, she's dealing with far, far more troubling polls and dynamics. Bernie has the momentum going into the last 10 days. It's really extraordinary.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
60. I am too, seriously.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:46 PM
Jan 2016

But just how far does someone go before it's over the top? Painting Bernie with a communism brush is disgusting.

Honest disagreements are fair game. This kind of thing turns me off.

My 2 cents.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
82. As I said, I don't think Sanders is a commie, nor does in matter. I don't think Clinton called him
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jan 2016

that. OK, maybe -- and that is not clear -- some operative did, but not Clinton. But, Sanders operatives and supporters have done similar including bashing good Democrats like Obama and Clinton.

Kall

(615 posts)
184. Yeah
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:00 AM
Jan 2016

I think about all the fun Trump would have raking her over the coals about her made-up war stories like being under sniper fire in Benghazi, and the rest of her mountain of baggage.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
79. Well, I guess all those Democratic third wayers in New York were wrong electing her. Obama was wrong
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:23 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:00 PM - Edit history (1)

tapping her for Secretary of State, and all the supporters she has now are wrong. Not to mention her actually taking the primary votes in 2008.

But I guess, you folks are the only one that get it.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
98. Many things Obama has done wrong or forgotten about or done a 180 on from his original campaign.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jan 2016

But good job trying to divert from the facts and heading down strawman ln a bit.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
113. He's been a good Prez and he was supported by good Democrats. Unfortunately, some Democrats feel
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:03 PM
Jan 2016

like Obama "just wasn't good enough."

Clinton will be a good Prez too because I don't believe all the Democrats that have supported her over they years are as out of touch as some here seem to believe.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
172. He wasn't good enough. We can do much, much better.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:17 AM
Jan 2016

But not with Hillary. She will be worse. She will have us at war with Iran - which would derail one of the best accomplishments of the Obama admin, opening up relations with them, she will continue the erosion of our privacy and civil rights.

No, we need someone like Bernie who will reach for the stars and only the stars that will help the people. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Last thing I want is a pessimist like Hillary who is now going so negative that she will just lie about anything just to get to be president.

But if for no other reason, vote for Bernie because Hillary will not win the general. She is using scorched earth tactics that people are sick of. She is attacking and being negative and condescending. She is a corporate hawk and has former Goldman Sachs execs on her staff.

Bernie: Because Fuck This Shit.

.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
190. Did you see the price of oil? We must have war with Iran. Oil would be over $100/barrel next day.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 08:17 AM
Jan 2016

That is driving much of this war fervor and support for Hillary.

We have a real mess on our hands and Bernie is the only way out.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
189. Obama was wrong tapping her for Secretary of State
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 08:07 AM
Jan 2016

It's so nice of you to admit that. I don't always disagree with Obama's picks but when I do they are Hillary Clinton and Rahm Emmanuel.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
138. And it is the DLC and its remnants that are MORE tied to Stalin than Bernie ever was...
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:33 PM
Jan 2016

... when they took Koch Brothers money and people in to help build the DLC cancer in the Democratic Party.

It was the Kochs that got their money from Fred Koch's business ties with COMMUNIST JOSEPH STALIN!!!

So Hillary folk! You want to explain why YOU are more tied to commies (rather than DEMOCRATIC socialists who AREN'T the same, and are the kind of socialists like Trotsky that 1%er favoring commies like Stalin would look to kill off).

If you are going to play this game, be prepared to have the more legitimate commie card played back at you!!

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
88. The difference is
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jan 2016

That she is in fact all of those things, whereas he is not a communist.... truth matters

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
125. Well, since her husband, whatsisname...
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:20 PM
Jan 2016

... popularized the term, and embraced the Third Way philosophy, such as it is for his entire presidency, it's not unreasonable to call Hillary a Third Way Democrat. She takes money from Neo-liberal oligarchs, so those both fit, too. Calling Sanders a commie, however, is WAY different, and scurrilous lie.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
153. Geebus. Are you kidding? It's very different. Those things are true.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jan 2016

She was a founding member of the DLC. That's third way and neo-liberal, by definiton. She and her husband are a power couple in politics with hundreds of millions of dollars. He was President. She was a Senator and a Secretary of State and is running for President. That's an oligarch, by definition.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Democratic+Leadership+Council&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/oligarchy

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
193. Either it's true or it isn't and if it isn't... why are they saying so?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jan 2016

You can turn the story into anything you like, you can make it as complicated as you like. Of course you can.

But if they're lying, it's lying.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
84. This says it all
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:27 PM
Jan 2016
Wessel said that his organization prefers to be named only when speaking about Republican candidates. He offered to have his organization named in certain cases if the Free Press requested permission. The Free Press declined to agree to Wessel's terms.


Most dems are OK with smearing republicans during a campaign, but very few are good with smearing a dem, even if it's not your pick. So you better not attach your name to it. Smart!

Bernie is not afraid to attach his name to anything he has to say about Clinton, because he doesn't use smear tactics. He only tells the truth.

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
59. It's worse than stupid pet tricks
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:46 PM
Jan 2016

Maybe it's her attempt at stupid humor tricks?



But a hysterical accusation nonetheless

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
7. Considering the pretty consistant --
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jan 2016

talk I've heard from surrogates this past week or so, I would say the Guardian has that one right.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
10. He also allowed fluoridation of the water while mayor of Burlington
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jan 2016

Mandrake, have you ever seen a commie drink a glass of water?

Response to pinebox (Original post)

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
18. Is This The "Joseph McCarthy" Era Again? WTF?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:49 PM
Jan 2016

Desperation? Stupidity Or just evil? Or Simply an Insult to the base that we might be so fkg stupid to fall for this shit?

riversedge

(70,328 posts)
25. what do you think Karl rove and his kind will do to Sanders, should by
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:38 PM - Edit history (1)

some miracle he is the Dem nominee?? Buck up.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
42. That is essentially what you are saying
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jan 2016

"Get used to it cuz this will be Rove's line of attack too"

So Hillary is beta testing Rove talking points?

Depraved line of attack coming from a so called Democrat, IMHO.

Nobody cares about 50s red baiting anymore and it only makes Hillary look foolish and desperate.

beltanefauve

(1,784 posts)
86. Which is really short-sighted
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jan 2016

If Bernie wins the nomination, we'll be dealing with a candidate that's been damaged by our own people. (And I don't for a minute buy the argument that Hillary "toughened up" Obama for the general election in 2008) And if Hillary pulls this off, she's going to need ALL OF US to work for her. She's turning off potential supporters with this tactic.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
32. What do you think Karl Rove and his kind will
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jan 2016

do to Hillary If she is the nominee?
They've been Planning to run against HRC for Years...Bernie just upset their years long planning, data gathering, opposition arguments and fairytales.
Buck up.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
46. So we should be thanking Clinton
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

then for smearing him?

I guess it is toughening him up for the GE.

Thanks Hillary. Damned, who knew her bullshit would turn out to be beneficial in the end!

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
81. Ok then, we should criticize
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jan 2016

her for attacking a fellow Democrat with a smear right out of Rove's playbook.

So which is it going to be? Lemonade out of lemons or just a heaping handful of bullshit.

beltanefauve

(1,784 posts)
91. Hill supporters
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jan 2016

And many pundits in 2008 argued that HRC's attacks were a good thing, that she "toughened Obama up" for the general election. It was bullshit then, and its bullshit now. Her race-baiting and other tactics turned off many people permanently, myself included.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
95. Yeah, me too.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jan 2016

Not that I ever really trusted, admired, or liked the Clinton's, but 2008 and the racist bullshit was the last straw for me.

Like her Iraq War vote, there are some things you just don't 'get over'.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
51. Rove's got nothing on HIllary. She's ten times worse.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jan 2016

Obama walked after getting through HIllary's shit in '08.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
179. So you agree with her red baiting? You like McCarthyism?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:38 AM
Jan 2016

Do you know about HUAC and what went on in the 50's? You should learn about it. It should never happen again and yet here you are justifying it.

Truly sickening.

.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
181. First of all, this is what Hillary herself is doing, not a supporter.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:41 AM
Jan 2016

Second, no, no Bernie supporter as done something akin to red baiting Hillary from what I've seen. But again, that is a strawman argument because we're not talking about what a Hillary supporter has done, we're talking about how her own campaign, meaning Hillary herself, is red baiting.

Perhaps you don't know what that means to this country, you should learn about it. Pretty disgusting what went on. Look for videos on HUAC on youtube.

.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
99. Let fucking Rove do what he will.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jan 2016

This is fucking Hillary R Clinton's fucking people doing it.

SICK!

You have no defense whatsoever.. None !

Don't lean too far right. You might just fall in.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
144. what do you think Karl rove and his kind will do to Sanders,
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:02 PM
Jan 2016

They're gonna do the same thing Hillary did????

Alrighty then!


I'm not worried.

It will backfire and look just as disgusting and stupid as when Hillary did it.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
175. So you're rationalizing Hillary using disgusting right wing tactics that Rove would use?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:25 AM
Jan 2016

Wow.

So let's be clear, this is a candidate you support and you are defending this behavior. So I would love to know why is it that you are supporting her?

.

beaglelover

(3,495 posts)
19. Poor Bernie supporters! Can't stand even the slightest criticism of Bernie.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:52 PM
Jan 2016

Better head to your safe space now.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
29. Did you notice that this OP and the replies are posted in GDP, hardly a safe place.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:59 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie supporters can and do post a lot in GDP and you will notice most threads are started by Bernie supporters. We don't have to just post in the Bernie Sanders group or in hidden rooms off of DU.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
36. Calling him a communist sympathizer is hardly "slight criticism" and you know it.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:05 PM
Jan 2016

I liked your other persona better. It was slightly more honest.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
39. So you are fine with 50s style right wing McCarthyism from your candidate?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jan 2016

It only makes her look foolish and desperate, but don't let that get in the way of your snark.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
47. One year from today...
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:17 PM
Jan 2016

... President Sanders' safe place will be The Oval Office.

Watching the wheels come off The Hillary Express is so damn fun.


Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
49. ah.. because
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jan 2016

you saying it may help dissuade the notion that your camp already made it's comfy safe space so long ago already at camp echo chamber.

Keep saying it though, you may just snag a dormant repug head in here and convince him/her to your tripe.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
147. Jury results:
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:14 PM
Jan 2016


Personal attacks on board members violates the rules.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Offensive personal attack
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Food fight. Everyone is being rude.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: That's most definitely a personal attack regarding a post that is NOT a personal attack in any sense of the word. It's inappropriate.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: it's just kind of a dumb question.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Hide the post, love the poster. Or somethin' like that. Sigh...
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
139. Keep lovin' your Koch brothers' commie money funded DLC roots why don't ya!
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:37 PM
Jan 2016

Study your history on who's tied to commies more than Bernie! DLC pols certainly are!!!

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
142. No, we're just tired of the lies your candidate
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:40 PM
Jan 2016

and her operatives spew. She can't win on her merits, so she has to try to smear her opponent, just like she did in 2008. It came back to bite her then, and it's coming back to bite her now.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
176. Red baiting and McCarthyism are hardly slight criticisms.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:29 AM
Jan 2016

Do you know about HUAC? You should go read up about it. There's a few documentaries you can find on youtube. You clearly have no idea what this means in terms of history.

.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
183. You think this is a "slightest" criticism.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:46 AM
Jan 2016

How about Bill CLinton being alleged to be friends with a child molester and flying places with him on his private airplane?

Would you consider THAT a slight criticism or a vicious, underhanded attack?

This commie talk crosses the line.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
194. It's not a criticism. It's just bollocks.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 12:23 PM
Jan 2016

"Commie pinko, rah rah rah" - we've heard all this before. This is what Republicans do, not Democrats.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
20. We knew it was coming, folks!
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:52 PM
Jan 2016

Buck up, this just proves what a threat Bernie is to the establishment.

Rovian/Brockian attacks from Hillary's minions is just election year business as usual.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
22. It will backfire spectacularly
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jan 2016

Apart from showing how out of touch the campaign is, it looks just like the anti-Corbyn hysteria. In general people are good at smelling desperation, and this reeks of it.

Now, an important point: this can actually help Bernie. If he makes it to the general election, this will be the first line of attack against him because, let's be honest, there isn't much else and this is low-hanging fruit. Consider this important practice.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
146. It will backfire spectacularly
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jan 2016

I know!

After this fails, they may have to bring out the religion thing next!


Autumn

(45,120 posts)
23. Yeah I've seen Bernie's Soviet flag pulled out several times this week
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jan 2016

Too bad she and her operatives stooped this low.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
26. Hillary slinging mud. May be her only chance at this point.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jan 2016

She loses big on the issues so she has to resort to lies and distortions.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
31. Has she hit bottom, yet?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:00 PM
Jan 2016

I don't think this country can handle too much more of the slime and disease that oozes from the pores of her and her cronies. They are no better in any way than the worst repubs on the other side. They will distort, lie, and do whatever else it takes to get power.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
35. RED BAITING Shrillary? That's what you got now?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:03 PM
Jan 2016

Vote for me because at least I'm not a commie?

Setting aside the utterly ridiculous nature of this latest ploy by Camp Weathervane, exactly who do they think is going to change their mind and vote for the Pantsuit based upon this? They really are throwing the kitchen sink aren't they? Nothing so pathetic as desperation.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
41. Just a head's up: If you want to stay here for awhile --
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jan 2016

I might tone down your "Shrillary" type rhetoric. One of your other posts was already alerted on as an attack on a DUer (I know, I served on the jury). Make your point, no need to be ugly -- I say this as a Bernie supporter.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
45. I fully expect to be banned, and probably today.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jan 2016

I have, in truth, become a fairly ugly person these past few years. But thanks, and I don't mean that sarcastically

zazen

(2,978 posts)
76. yeah, I detest her politics & behavior but let's leave "shrill" and "pantsuit" out of it
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:18 PM
Jan 2016

I'm a fellow Bernie supporter too, and I understand your anger at her campaign's behavior, but I wouldn't want to see a supporter banned.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
43. Zero connection to Clinton.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jan 2016

I would say there is a better chance this is Rove supporting Sanders.

"passed on to The Guardian by a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat."

Vinca

(50,313 posts)
61. Her internal polling must be something to see. Bernie must be winning by more than we think he is.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jan 2016

This is the first time I remember red baiting in an election since the Cold War.

Peregrine Took

(7,417 posts)
64. They must be petrified they will lose Iowa. .
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jan 2016

All those dreams of dynasty...."down the drain" of history.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
67. They must be VERY worried that they will lose.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

Otherwise, why would they be bringing out such blatant lies, trying to pawn them off on low-information voters?

sarge43

(28,946 posts)
78. They really want to go there?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jan 2016

In 1969 Bill Clinton visited the USSR on a student visa. So by this cork screw logic, the husband of their candidate is a commie.

The problem with throwing it in the fan, it can fly back at you.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
80. And the sad thing about this is
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:24 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary campaign operatives and supporters here will go along with this Right Wing style McCarthyism politics.

This is sad for the Democratic Party and sad for the USA.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
83. its ON,clintons
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jan 2016

nothing off the table now

remember newton? you should be thinking about him right now.....

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
89. Did she object when Walmart was sourcing some of its goods from China
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jan 2016

in the 80's and 90's, on grounds that strengthening a communist state was antithetical to the American Way? She was on the Board of Directors for six years. I don't think she's ever criticized them for that.

So people in glass houses.

Wal-Mart isn’t the first multinational to source so heavily from Asia. Beginning in the 1970s, the relocation of labor-intensive manufacturing to Asia nurtured the growth of the Four Little Dragons (South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore), whose companies entered into contracts to manufacture for Western brand names. When China opened up to foreign investment in the early 1980s, offering vast stretches of greenfield sites, attractive tax breaks, and an abundance of labor at just one-tenth the cost of the Dragons’ wages, another wave of regional manufacturing relocation was set in motion.

So massive was this shift that the majority of the so-called Chinese manufacturing suppliers today are actually companies from the Four Little Dragons that have set up assembly plants in China. Only in the past decade have local Chinese companies, having learned the ropes of manufacturing for export, been drawn increasingly into this supply chain—first as subcontractors for the Little Dragon–owned factories and more recently as direct producers for Wal-Mart.

Once sourcing from China became a bandwagon, Wal-Mart led the way in driving down wages in the suppliers’ factories. To cut procurement costs, Wal-Mart moved its global outsourcing headquarters from Hong Kong to the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen in 2002 and began focusing intensely on directly sourcing from factories in China rather than buying through wholesalers and agents. As Wal-Mart has squeezed its China-based suppliers for lower prices, their workers, largely poor migrants from the countryside, have borne the brunt of the pressure to cut costs. As one Hong Kong buying agent put it, “Suppliers still have places where they can cut fat, but the easiest fat to cut is workers’ wages.”


http://prospect.org/article/wal-mart%E2%80%99s-china-connections
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
100. I suppose it's only fair to sling mud back..... I would not vote for a doormat
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jan 2016

of course, many here would prefer Hillary to be a doormat, I know Bernie would.

But back to the OP....are we to assign to any candidate everything their supporters say or do? Or are all you Bernie supporters attempting to state that this is a statement directly made by Hillary?

spedtr90

(719 posts)
105. Who else visited the USSR in 1988? Reagan; 125,000 American citizens; 20 major corporations
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:55 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:57 PM - Edit history (2)

Mayor Sanders went to the USSR during the Cold War (1988) to establish a sister city.

True to its progressive perspective, the Sanders administration helped local residents who sought to ease tensions between the United States and Soviet Union by initiating citizen-to-citizen exchanges with a Russian city.
http://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/has-burlington-abandoned-its-sister-cities-around-the-world-not-exactly/Content?oid=2137534

President Reagan went to the USSR during the Cold War (1988) to meet with Gorbachev. He praised Russian cultural achievements, particularly the nation’s great literary tradition. The purpose of course was to improve US-USSR relations.

Intourist, the state-run Soviet travel agency, said about 125,000 Americans would visit the Soviet Union this year, slightly more than the total during the peak years of detente in the mid-1970s. American travel agents attribute this rise to warmer relations between the superpowers and to President Reagan's visit there in June."People always seemed to think that it was unpatriotic to go to the U.S.S.R.,'' Cavalli said. ''But by going there himself, Reagan made it the patriotic thing to do.''

American corporations are catching Soviet fever as well.

General Tours Inc., which has been sending American tourists to the Soviet Union for 33 years, organized trips for about 20 major American corporations this summer, compared with only 4 last year, said the company's president, Alexander Harris.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1988-10-26/lifestyle/0080020157_1_soviet-union-russian-visit-the-soviet

Bernie's trip means nothing.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
135. I went and studied there in 76. I ended up teaching there after the USSR fell.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jan 2016

My visit earlier was YUGE.

Hardly a reason to lie and spew shit about our next president.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
110. I would say that is unbelievable from a Democrat.....
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jan 2016

But I would be lying.
I've seen it here for days now. Pathetic.

 

november3rd

(1,113 posts)
116. I got news for ya:
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:06 PM
Jan 2016

"Communism" is originally a Christian cultural phenomenon. It's even referred to in the Book of Acts 4:32-37.

Communism was common among religious orders through the Middle Ages, and was one of the trademarks of the early Protestant Reformation, which is what scared the nobles into supporting the Pope.

In America, the numberless communist communities are cataloged by Alfred Noyes in his definitive work, History of American Socialisms. Most of these groups were Christian communities, but some were atheist.

It wasn't until Marx substituted "the State" for "God" that Marxism became a particular, unique strain of communism.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
129. Sanders “sympathized with the USSR during the Cold War”
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:24 PM
Jan 2016

Well, thank Zardoz the Cold War has been over for decades.....


This is almost funny! it's so dumb.


Hillary's not running for the nomination, she's flailing around like a fish on the deck for the nomination.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
130. Keep it up, Hillary
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:25 PM
Jan 2016

Just keep it up. Whereas you may well have had Bernie supporters support you in the GE if, god forbid, you "win" the nomination, you are alienating voters by the thousands with your blatant lies and distortions. Many who may have held their noses to vote for you will not do so now.

Does she never learn? This kind of crap will NOT win her a damn thing but disdain and commendation. She is so conniving and deceitful, not the qualities I want in a president.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
132. "passed on to the Guardian by a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat”"
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:26 PM
Jan 2016

But as long as it's anti-Hillary it will be considered gospel.



emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
134. If she gets the nomination, who will vote for her?
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:29 PM
Jan 2016

She is reinforcing the fact that she is not to be trusted.

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
141. Deja vu
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 05:39 PM
Jan 2016

Same thing Hillary Clinton did with Obama in 08 with the Bill Ayers


What is Clinton Camp's next like of attacks questioning where he worships or his religion ?

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
155. her transparent campaign gets worse every day. my friend supports her but she hates her campaign.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jan 2016

She knows what this will do to gq voters.

 

LeatherSofa

(38 posts)
168. Well if there is an actual doc,
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 02:47 AM
Jan 2016

then wear the damn thing. He's your candidate. If the Socialist turns out to be the Democratic nominee, I doubt if we win 5 states if that. The slaughter will remind people of Reagan/Mondale 1984. We might win District of Columbia.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
171. Really? > a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat”
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 04:12 AM
Jan 2016

"...The dossier, prepared by opponents of Sanders and passed on to the Guardian by a source who would only agree to be identified as “a Democrat”, alleges that Sanders “sympathized with the USSR during the Cold War” because he went on a trip there to visit a twinned city while he was mayor of Burlington..."

Yeah...that's a great source to be bringing to attack a Democratic candidate.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
192. The guy just got off vacation for constantly dumping right wing shit in this forum.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 11:52 AM
Jan 2016

I guess he doesn't plan to stop anytime soon. You used to get a nice pizza of your choice for trolling DU.



Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
195. I've been away from DU for a while and it's amazing how much has changed.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

May take me a while to get my bearings...

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
188. She's been seeing her polling amongst older voters start to slip
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:21 AM
Jan 2016

I assume this was intended to shore that up, as its a hugely important demographic for her.

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
196. Perhaps we all are Democratic Communists after all...
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jan 2016

Just saying... Nothing wrong with it, if the terms are clearly defined.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WTF is this crap Hillary?...