Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHeadquarter's talking point is vile, what should I do?
The campaign has instructed you to start posting a clearly vile attack on your rival.
Do you follow orders and start posting the attack?
Or do you ignore orders and keep your ethics intact.
9 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Follow orders. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Ignore orders. | |
9 (100%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Headquarter's talking point is vile, what should I do? (Original Post)
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2016
OP
Mike__M
(1,052 posts)1. Unfair question
It depends which camp you're in.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)2. Fair point.
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)3. 1) run to HuffPo. 2) post a link. 3) repeat at least 20 times per day.
4) see #3.
p.s. yes this is
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)4. First off, why is this hypothetical me
even remotely willing to follow orders from headquarters? Am I not an independent operator? Shouldn't I be running my campaign the way I want to?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)5. The ethics-circuit was left out of the 2016 model Hilbot n/t
jkbRN
(850 posts)6. Ignore and open a dialogue with the person that gave you the orders,
To completely ignore would be silly, and not even begin to solve the problem.