Religion
Related: About this forumWhen Organized Religion Becomes a Cult
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eliyahu-federman/when-organized-religion-become_b_3996139.htmlEliyahu Federman
Posted: 09/27/2013 8:00 AM
Updated: 09/27/2013
The distinction between cult and religion lies squarely in how those leaving or those wanting to leave are treated
Diane Benscoter tells her harrowing story of leaving the "Moonie" cult. In highlighting the dangers of cults, Benscoter uses clear examples like David Koresh, Johnstown, suicide bombers, the Westboro Baptist Church, but often the line between conventional religion and cult is not so clearly defined.
Cults claim exclusivity, are highly secretive, and authoritarian. To many of my atheist friends, religion fits the bill. What distinguishes religion from cults is the ability to question without being shunned and ability to reject dogmatic tenets without being shunned.
Many religions make exclusive claims to truth. There is nothing wrong with that. Many systems of philosophy do the same. Kantianism's categorical truths are, for example, incompatible with utilitarianisms balancing of harm and good.
more at link
msongs
(67,441 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)charismatic leader or an emphasis on money, they are not a cult?
What do you think of the distinction made in the article?
pinto
(106,886 posts)Among other factors. Another snip from the piece -
"Any religious community can become a cult. It's not about how faith is expressed in a community but more importantly how people are treated if they want to leave and disbelieve."
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Although there are often lots of grey areas, sometimes the line is bright if you use these criteria.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)When it's someone else's faith its a cult and frankly a little creepy and weird.
Bryant
cbayer
(146,218 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Or that's where a lot of people are.
Because the truth is that it takes time to understand another belief system; and the process is inevitably a little uncomfortable. Rewarding I believe, but really taking the time to understand another belief system or ethical system forces you to look at your own a bit more closely. Confronts you with the possibility that you might not be right.
It's easier to just dismiss other religions/philosophies as simply cults. But less satisfying. And wrong.
Bryant
cbayer
(146,218 posts)What do you think of the distinctions this writer makes?
What I like about this article is that is provides a way to make distinctions to some degree.
Clearly there is a spectrum.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)It's just a semantic question. If you define a cult as a religion too small to have political power, you see the drift of the discussion.
Originally cult and religion were synonyms. 'Cult' just lost the linguistic contest.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)There are many instances of organized religions developing splinter groups that become cults.
While I agree that they have a higher likelihood or burning out (or drinking poisoned koolaid in an all out blowout), I don't think they generally develop into organized religions.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)It's just a question of point of view whether a splinter isn't a new thing small enough to be a cult. Southern Baptists started as a splinter but they were plenty big enough to still be a religion. OTOH, lots of cults splinter into smaller cults.
Strange. A religious question which somehow quickly becomes complicated. Seems to happen now and then.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)What do you think of the author's take on making a distinction based on what kind of consequences there are for questioning or trying to leave?
I thought the information she shared on the Amish kids that go back was really interesting. I had not heard that before.
Using her criteria, that would make the Amish more of a cult than a religion.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)The author shares my opinion that the Amish aren't the cute antique survival so many Americans imagine them to be.
Good catch, cbayer.