HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Religion & Spirituality » Religion (Group) » I had lunch with Richard ...

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 06:10 PM

 

I had lunch with Richard Dawkins today.

I sat right across the table from him.

Background: My atheist group, FLASH, hosted Dawkins, and toured the Everglades with him, a couple of years ago. (I couldn't make the 'glades trip. ) He's now on a book tour, and did a major event in Miami. He suggested we have a luncheon with some FLASH members. About thirty people attended.

He was with us about two hours. Lunched and small talked for 45 minutes, and then started a discussion. He had no prepared remarks, but addressed the issue he termed "tokenism." That is, that fighting over slogans, mottoes, and pledges is a distraction. (And he also cited, and acknowledged the opposing views.) He feels the major issue is the notion that children automatically inherit the religion of their parents. As in "these are Jewish children," rather than "these are children of Jewish parents." He pointed out that we don't address republican children, or humanist children, or logical positivist children, so why only religious indoctrination?

Our local group, and some allied groups, have been battling some installations of religious monuments around the state. One of the allied groups is the Satanic Church (an ironic name) and Dawkins expressed some curiosity. He wondered at the PR of calling themselves that, since they are atheists. He suggested we should be after religious tax exemption. And there was consensus on that. Basically, there were two main topics: questions on evolution and genetics, and on ways to improve atheist public relations.

He also reiterated the notion that he can't be absolutely sure there is no creator -- just as he cannot be absolutely sure there are no unicorns and leprechauns.

Bonus! The luncheon was held at a golf club that is literally around the corner from where I live. The food was good. Italian buffet. Weather 70F. and sunny.

--imm


16 replies, 3356 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 16 replies Author Time Post
Reply I had lunch with Richard Dawkins today. (Original post)
immoderate Dec 2014 OP
cbayer Dec 2014 #1
immoderate Dec 2014 #2
PassingFair Dec 2014 #11
Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #3
edhopper Dec 2014 #4
immoderate Dec 2014 #5
rug Dec 2014 #6
immoderate Dec 2014 #7
rug Dec 2014 #8
malokvale77 Dec 2014 #9
bvf Dec 2014 #10
edhopper Dec 2014 #12
immoderate Dec 2014 #13
edhopper Dec 2014 #14
immoderate Dec 2014 #15
edhopper Dec 2014 #16

Response to immoderate (Original post)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 06:21 PM

1. How very cool for you.

Sounds like it was interesting. Glad you got to attend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cbayer (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 06:33 PM

2. Thanks. 'Cool' pretty much sums it up.

 



--imm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Reply #2)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:57 PM

11. Did he look like this?



Cause that would be amusing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Original post)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 06:34 PM

3. What? The [email protected]! didn't abuse all the women and roast a baby?

 

Obviously this was an imposter. Demand your money back.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Original post)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 07:08 PM

4. Great for you

I have heard him talk, I found him charming, funny, restrained and always clear and logical.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #4)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 07:22 PM

5. My impressions are in line with yours.

 

Especially in such a sympathetic group.

--imm


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Original post)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 07:32 PM

6. Can you elaborate?

 

"He . . . . addressed the issue he termed 'tokenism." That is, that fighting over slogans, mottoes, and pledges is a distraction."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rug (Reply #6)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 08:19 PM

7. He meant things like, "In God We Trust," on money...

 

and "under God" in the pledge, as well as religiously inspired symbols in courts, and religious monuments on public ground. He doesn't believe that's the best target for social activity. They are the "tokens." He conceded though, that there are those who say that some will point to those aspects and claim it proves that this is a Christian country. And he said they could be right.

Again, he recommended we turn our actions toward the legacy, and tax issues. He made it clear that these were his opinions, and not necessarily right.

--imm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Reply #7)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 08:25 PM

8. Thanks.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Original post)

Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:24 PM

9. I'm not normally a jealous person...

when it comes to others good fortune. But I am jealous of this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Original post)

Tue Dec 9, 2014, 02:06 AM

10. Good for you!

 

Sounds like a very enjoyable afternoon.

Put me down as jealous, too!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Original post)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 03:05 PM

12. I meant to ask

Did he eat live babies for lunch?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #12)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 03:37 PM

13. He had to eat what we ate.

 

Did I mention that catering was provided by our local atheist group?

--imm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Reply #13)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 04:14 PM

14. So the babies

Were cooked?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #14)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 04:46 PM

15. Pickled.

 

Opinions differ on whether that qualifies as being "cooked."

--imm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Reply #15)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 04:52 PM

16. Mmmm

Sounds relish.

But seriously, great you had this opportunity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread