Post here if the MLB team you follow has won a World Series.

[trumad]

Marlins = 2

[MaineDem]

1. Red Sox = 7

I was thrilled in 2004 although I missed the celebration because of the election. I didn't think we'd ever win one in my lifetime.

[Iggo]

2. Dodgers = 6

GO DODGERS.
BEAT THE HATED GIANTS.

[cherokeeprogressive]

23. Boo Gnats!

[KamaAina]

24. For the last time, the Gnats are a Class A affiliate of the Mets

not to be confused with the 2010 World Champion San Francisco Giants.

[ellisonz]

32. +1

THINK BLUE!

[RockaFowler]

3. Marlins - 2

Oh yeah!!

[Yavin4]

4. Yankees = 27

Enough said.

[trumad]

7. true dat

[Jack Rabbit]

5. Giants = 1

Some of you may think that's modest, but San Francisco doesn't need a fistfull of world championships to be a world class city.

[center][/center][font size="1"]Photo by http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User schwen Daniel Schwen in Wikipedia (Creative Commons License, Attribution/Share Alike)
[/font]

[trumad]

8. I use to rag Upton about not winning a World Series...

Can't do it anymore.

[Auggie]

6. S.F. Giants = 1,

(6 overall), Oakland Athletics = 4 (9 overall), Cleveland = 2 (they would have won a third in 2007 had the Sox not been juicing).

[JonLP24]

9. That assumes they

would have defeated the Rockies. I know the Sox made it look easy but everything would have different. Decisions on what pitch to throw, reactions to situations, etc. would have made the series very different. Not saying the Rockies would have won of course but just that it would have been a different series.

Though I'm not sure you can the '07 were juicing. They had drug testing in '05(I think). Perhaps you could say Manny Ramirez since he never stopped but Ortiz was from 2003 and I really don't trust that as there were no appeals process, no way of knowing if it was a false positive, don't know what the exact substance he tested positive for.

[Auggie]

10. Hey ...

I'm just screwing around. Of course there's no way of knowing.

[getting old in mke]

11. White Sox = 3

And a particularly notable World Series loss.

[Ohio Dem]

12. Reds = 5

Don't know what's wrong with them this year. It's early, though.

[countryjake]

13. Cincinnati Reds - 5 ........ Seattle Mariners - Never

I was right there for the Big Red Machine days, and couldn't ever reconcile how bad they got screwed in '81. Moved West in '80.

Not much to say about the Mariners, except I've felt forever sorry that Junior never saw a World Series and am now beginning to feel the same for Ichiro.

[1gobluedem]

14. Tigers = 4

Hoping for good things this season but they haven't lived up to billing yet.

[ScreamingMeemie]

18. Here is my take on our boys.

They don't have that veteran presence in the clubhouse any more and they suffer for it. When there was Magglio, Placido, and Carlos, the team played better. Now it seems we have better hitters with less discipline. For one, Miggy should be getting in trouble for appealing to first base. The team is better than they are playing.

[dhill926]

15. Cubs.....

1908 baby!

[madinmaryland]

16. Pirates = 5. Silence from the Rockie/Ranger fan.

Whatever it is this week.

[MrSlayer]

17. Phillies, 2 in 127 years.

Woohoo.

[seeviewonder]

19. Cardinals = 11

Hopefully another one this year once everyone is healthy!

[Gemini Cat]

20. White Sox = 3

1906 Cubs
1917 NY Giants
2005 Astros

[Lugnut]

21. Dupe.

[Lugnut]

21. Yep.

27 of them.

[Swede]

25. Blue Jays = 2

nt

[Jamaal510]

26. A's=9

Philadelphia: 5
Kansas City: 0
Oakland: 4

3rd most WS titles, behind only the Yankees and Cardinals.

[ProfessorGAC]

27. Cubs Have Won

But, not for more than century. So, probably doesn't really count.

[charlie and algernon]

28. Marlins = 2

Orioles = 3

[rocktivity]

29. Mets = 2

The Washington Natinals seems to be the Mets of their generation.


rocktivity

[dbackjon]

30. Dbacks = 1

[hifiguy]

31. 1987 and 1991

This year's starting pitching is, to put it mildly, disturbing.