Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 09:55 AM Nov 2014

"Many Circumventing Colorado High-Capacity Magazine Ban"

Many Circumventing Colorado High-Capacity Magazine Ban

DENVER (CBS4)- A CBS4 Investigation has found Coloradans are circumventing the state’s controversial ban on high capacity gun magazines in numerous ways both basic and clever.

“I’m not surprised at all,” said Weld County Sheriff John Cooke, after viewing the results of the CBS4 Investigation.

<snip>

At a northern Colorado gun show, a seller displayed an entire table full of 30 round magazines that had been “retrofitted” to hold 15 rounds and comply with the controversial law.

The seller was asked if anyone would care if a buyer removed the modification and turned the magazine back into a high capacity unit.

“No, but I gotta be careful about how I say things because they would love nothing more than to make me a poster child so I’m very careful on how I say things.”

<more>

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2014/10/30/many-circumventing-colorado-high-capacity-magazine-ban/


This does not even address the common practice of taping magazines together in groups of two out more.

So.... Will it be worth losing the Senate over?
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
1. another feel good law that does nothing but
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 10:23 AM
Nov 2014

hurt Democrats and makes the pro-controller side look silly. Unenforceable is correct. I buy a lot of my USGI mags as parts. I prefer 20 rounders though.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
2. For that matter nothing prevents them from driving to an adjoining state
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 11:28 AM
Nov 2014

and buying them there. If you are a Massachusetts or Connecticut resident all you have to do is drive to RI, NH, VT or ME and you can buy magazines that hold more then your state law allows easily.

The same applies to Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Illinois or California for that matter, all of them have neighboring states that don't have the stupid, useless magazine ban limits.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
3. They where warned...THEY WHERE REPEATEDLY WARNED..
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 12:31 PM
Nov 2014

Now they must deal with the consequences of pissing so many voters off..

Just to remind you..

1. Senators were recalled...

2. Vast majority of sheriffs in the state hate it, and will not enforce it..

3. No one has been (or will be if they have half a brain) prosecuted for breaking the law.. (no sir, I have had these 30 round magazines for years.)

4. Ran a company (and supporting businesses out of state)

5. So easily to circumvent the law that a child could do it with common tools

6. Not a single issue getting them freely and cheaply from nearby states. Or even having them mailed in

7. Effectively neutered a really good Democratic presidential candidate... Actually exposing him as a pander is a good thing for the rest of us. He practically has zero chance of national office now, unless he moves to Chicago.

In the end, all they did was chew on their own boots.

Now, let me ask again, was it worth it??

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
4. I wouldn't expect an answer.
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 05:10 PM
Nov 2014

Though if they were honest and talking, Id bet they'd say it was worth it.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
6. "Id bet they'd say it was worth it."
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 08:19 PM
Nov 2014

I'd be interested to see the metrics that would lead them to such a conclusion.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
11. The amount if irritation...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 12:41 PM
Nov 2014

The amount if irritation expressed by people they see as opponents, I expect, is the yardstick they'd use.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
5. "Now they must deal with the consequences of pissing so many voters off.. "
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 08:18 PM
Nov 2014

What is particularly galling is the decidedly undemocratic nature in which the law was passed. Witnesses were shut-out, rape survivors were publically humiliated and every procedural gimmick available was employed to push the bill though in the face of the public outcry.

The PEOPLE have "voted" and they nullified this law. Democracy wins.

Too bad it came as a loss for Democrats.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
12. #1 - Dem Senators Regained Pro-Gun Seats 2014
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 12:27 PM
Nov 2014

#2 - Those Sheriffs will shoot you in an instant if you're black have a gun or no gun.
#3 - People with brains don't need guns and therefore won't break any laws
#4 - Ran a company out of state with a couple hundred employees who chose not to go to Texas or where ever hell hole they decide to make their murder-clips. Meanwhile 10,000 new jobs because of legal marijuana.
#5 - Speaking of children...they keep getting killed by guns due to their irresponsible gun-nut parents.
#6 - Drive to Wyoming if you're planning the next mass murder or one of them survivalists.
#7 - What presidential candidate are you talking about - and why mention Chicago? Denver is much like Chicago.

It was worth it yes, make them drive out of my state. - hell maybe they'll move to your miserable state.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
13. "Those grapes were probably sour anyway ..."
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 02:28 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:05 PM - Edit history (1)

So winning back 2 seats was a win for gun control. But somehow losing the entire Colorado and US Senate was not a loss for gun control?

You have a strange way of looking at things and a very rude attitude to other DU member you don't agree with. But it's about what we have come to expect from you and your ilk.

Oh wait, I forgot. Tuesday was a big win for Mom's Demand Action, not for Dems but for Bloomberg's minions. We know that because Shannon Watts told us in a video press release ... that Bloomie bought and paid for, so it must be true.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
15. "But somehow losing the entire Colorado and US Senate was not a loss for gun control?"
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 02:50 AM
Nov 2014

That's the third time (that I know of) that this has been mentioned, and so far
those touting the 2 seats regained have studiously avoided discussing it...

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
14. re: "Speaking of children...they keep getting killed...blah, blah..."
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 04:13 PM
Nov 2014

And we all know it takes a minimum of 16 shots to kill a child, so this law is important.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
16. #1 The GOP took the state senate and obliterated Democratic control of the state house.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:09 PM
Nov 2014

#2 Baseless but assuming it to be true how does being disarmed improve one's treatment at the hands of racists?

#3 100 million gun owners and you reflexively assume they're all criminals

#4 You just have a nasty attitude

#5 An irresponsible shooting only requires 1 bullet, a matter which this Pyrrhic victory of a law does nothing to address.

Not that "OMG! The children!" ever seems to be put forth with any degree of sincerity once it is noted alcohol destroys more children annually by orders of magnitude.

#6 Why would a determined mass murder confine their actions to only the state in which the purchased a given implement?

#7 Chicago is mentioned because it is the archetype for the anti-rights regimes yet by its self produces nearly 5% of the nation's gun homicides.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
7. This is what you get when feel gooders ignore their voters to promote an
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 09:33 PM
Nov 2014

agenda.

Basically the 1%ers rammed this down the good citizens throats. Hopefully the people can take their rights from a handful of regressives sometime in the near future.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
17. I am loathe to call them Democrats as "demo" means "of the people."
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:11 PM
Nov 2014

The people were deliberately and arrogantly ignored.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
8. "get around the law," "mockery," "cross state lines:"
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 10:39 AM
Nov 2014

The same ways all standard orthodox prohibitions are defeated. Prohibitions aren't for the public good, but are to make the banner "feel good" by punishing some ginned-up "other."

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
9. Now they are all just "Loopholes" that have to be closed
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 11:31 AM
Nov 2014

Idiots rush to pass legislation, with no input from anyone that actually knows what they're taking about.

Then they either declare their stupidity is full of "loopholes" that must be closed "for the children" or ... quietly let things unofficially lapse, like the 7 round magazine limit n NY.

But they usually do the quiet withdrawal without all the fanfare and high profile press events they had when they passed the stupidity.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"Many Circumventing ...