Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DUIC

(167 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:39 PM Feb 2012

Peculiar proliferation of Palestine refugees

Of all the issues that drive the Arab-Israeli conflict, none is more central, malign, primal, enduring, emotional and complex than the status of those people known as Palestine refugees. The origins of this unique case, notes Nitza Nachmias of Tel Aviv University, goes back to Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nations Security Council’s mediator. Referring to those Arabs who fled the British mandate of Palestine, he argued in 1948 that the U.N. had a “responsibility for their relief” because it was a U.N. decision - the establishment of Israel - that had made them refugees. However inaccurate his view, it still remains alive and potent and helps explain why the U.N. devotes unique attention to Palestine refugees pending their own state.

True to Bernadotte’s legacy, the U.N. set up a range of special institutions exclusively for Palestine refugees. Of these, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), founded in 1949, stands out as the most important. It is both the only refugee organization to deal with a specific people (the United Nations High Commission for Refugees takes care of all non-Palestinian refugees) and the largest U.N. organization in terms of staff.

UNRWA seemingly defines its wards with great specificity: “Palestine refugees are people whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict.” The ranks of these refugees (who initially included some Jews) have, of course, much diminished over the past 64 years. Accepting UNRWA’s (exaggerated) number of 750,000 original Palestine refugees, only a fraction of that number, about 150,000, remain alive.

UNRWA’s staff has taken three major steps over the years to expand the definition of Palestine refugees. First, and contrary to universal practice, it continued the refugee status of those who became citizens of an Arab state (Jordan in particular). Second, it made a little-noticed decision in 1965 that extended the definition of “Palestine refugee” to the descendants of those refugees who are male, a shift that permits Palestine refugees uniquely to pass their refugee status on to subsequent generations. The U.S. government, the agency’s largest donor, only mildly protested this momentous change. The U.N. General Assembly endorsed it in 1982, so now the definition of a Palestine refugee officially includes “descendants of Palestine refugee males, including legally adopted children.” Third, UNRWA in 1967 added refugees from the Six-Day War to its rolls; today they constitute about a fifth of the Palestine refugee total.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/20/peculiar-proliferation-of-palestine-refugees/


The UN as Interlocutor = No Resolution. The best thing that the UN can do to achieve a lasting peace is to pack up its bag and stop meddling.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
1. "The UN as Interlocutor = No Resolution. The best thing that the UN can do to achieve a lasting
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:45 PM
Feb 2012

peace is to pack up its bag and stop meddling." Agreed, cause it's far from an independant body as it should be if it is going to exist at all.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
3. His name is included in the headline in all caps
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 03:23 AM
Feb 2012

"PIPES: Peculiar proliferation of Palestine refugees"

Not sure how one could have missed that.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
4. I read the first part of the article in the OP, and didn't bother to read
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 03:58 AM
Feb 2012

it a second time at washingtontimes.com. My bad.

Nevertheless, I'm reading about the Washington Times on Wikipedia, and it's an interesting read to say the least.

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
8. Better to stick to the echo chamber eh?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 01:28 PM
Feb 2012

If it is not azzam or electronic intifadah or some other website that has an editor brought up on terrorism charges you don't want to accidentally expose yourself to a contrarian opinion.

parkia00

(572 posts)
5. What Palestinian refugees?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:16 AM
Feb 2012

I'm sure if some people can think they have the power to convince the world that there are no such things as Palestinian refugees, they would certainly try. Then these people with have their little army of loyal minions squawking to the same tune for all to hear.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
6. Why should descendants of refugees be labeled refugees themselves and denied citizenship...
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:37 AM
Feb 2012

....in countries where they were born? Only Palestinian descendants of refugees are labeled that way and therefore denied these rights. There exists no other ethnic or racial group other than Palestinians who have remained stateless refugees lacking basic rights for more than 60 years.

Their pro-Palestinian activist friends could seemingly care less about their continued misery.

And if their pro-Palestinian friends couldn't care less about their condition and lack of rights throughout the mideast, why should anyone else care?



Let's face it. Those who claim they're pro-Palestinians are nothing of the sort. They loathe Palestinians - including the refugees - every bit as much as those who are openly anti-Palestinian.

parkia00

(572 posts)
7. Unfortuntely so...
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:56 PM
Feb 2012

as long as this conflict festers, the Palestinians will continue to be used by groups whose sole purpose is to demonize Israel and the Jews, using the excuse of what Israel does to the Palestinians as fodder. This includes entities within the Palestinian camp as well. It will be Israel's best interest in the long run to find a way to resolve this issue. Even if it means difficult answers and keeping a close eye on the extremist camps within Israel. Why give ammunition to the enemy to be used against yourself?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Peculiar proliferation of...