Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 08:59 PM Nov 2013

Texas Homeowner Battles $3 Million Defamation Lawsuit For Exposing Fracking Company’s Pollution

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/11/08/2913651/steve-lipsky-range-resources/


Steve Lipsky, a Texas homeowner, has found himself at the center of a $3 million lawsuit for defamation from an oil and gas company, after he exposed the company for contaminating his water supply with methane and benzene.

Despite his attempts to avert the expensive legal entanglement, Julie Dermansky reports at DeSmogBlog that last month the Fort Worth Court of Appeals allowed the defamation case to move forward.

Lipsky sued Range Resources originally in 2011, prompted by an Environmental Protection Agency order that Range Resources endangered Texas residents’ health. His case was dismissed, because the presiding judge claimed there was no jurisdiction, but Range Resources took the unusual step of countersuing Lipsky for libel. It alleged that Lipsky and others conspired to get “the EPA and the media to wrongly label and prosecute Range as a polluter of the environment.” The company said that his public video of Lipsky lighting on fire a methane-filled hose escaping from his water well was an unfair portrayal, even though Lipsky maintains he can still set the water on fire in a video from October.

“The hose was used in the interest of safety, not to deceive anyone,” Lipsky told DeSmogBlog, before lighting fire at the end of the hose again. But according to Range Resources and the judge who dismissed Lipsky’s lawsuit in 2012, Lipsky could not possibly light his water on fire. The video “was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media with a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning,” the judge wrote at the time.
(more)


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas Homeowner Battles $3 Million Defamation Lawsuit For Exposing Fracking Company’s Pollution (Original Post) Bill USA Nov 2013 OP
Bring a jar of that water in to court hootinholler Nov 2013 #1
It's not defamation if it's the truth. silverweb Nov 2013 #2
I'm sick of people saying how wonderful and great humans are stuntcat Nov 2013 #3

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
2. It's not defamation if it's the truth.
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 11:31 PM
Nov 2013

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]The court better do the right thing here.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Texas Homeowner Battles $...