Here's a "paper" claiming no AGW using cointegration. Who wants to rip this shit apart?

[Systematic Chaos]

I'd try but I can't do teh calculus.

http://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/3/561/2012/esdd-3-561-2012.pdf

On edit: here's the abstract: http://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/3/561/2012/esdd-3-561-2012.html

[GliderGuider]

1. Tamino apparently already took it apart.

Except I can't understand HIS math either

Start here: http://citizenschallenge.blogspot.ca/2013/01/polynomial-cointegration-tests-of.html

Near the end of the blog article, the author quotes a FB convo between the SkepticalScience guys and a denier eager to score some points. SS makes it absolutely clear that the methodology used in the paper was invalid, so its results are meaningless.

[Systematic Chaos]

4. You are my hero!

I found a reference to this whole thing over on the McDougall site's Global Warming board. There are a bunch of asshole paid-to-post gadflies who won't cut the bullshit over there, and the main moderator other than Dr. McDougall himself is pretty much a right-wing libertarian type so he's no help in scrubbing them from the site. I got banned, though, and called "unstable and erratic", when I deleted a bunch of my posts over there when I was extremely depressed last summer. Didn't flame out, didn't troll anyone. Just deleted posts. Go figure.

[Speck Tater]

2. No need to argue. Nature bats last.

The proof will be forthcoming in due time.

[Warren Stupidity]

3. This bullshit has been floating in the bowl since at least 2010.