Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWe Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say
It looks like the future is just about here.
Whats the number one reason we riot? The plausible, justifiable motivations of trampled-upon humanfolk to fight back are manypoverty, oppression, disenfranchisement, etcbut the big one is more primal than any of the above. Its hunger, plain and simple. If theres a single factor that reliably sparks social unrest, its food becoming too scarce or too expensive. So argues a group of complex systems theorists in Cambridge, and it makes sense.
In a 2011 paper, researchers at the Complex Systems Institute unveiled a model that accurately explained why the waves of unrest that swept the world in 2008 and 2011 crashed when they did. The number one determinant was soaring food prices. Their model identified a precise threshold for global food prices that, if breached, would lead to worldwide unrest.
The MIT Technology Review explains how CSIs model works: The evidence comes from two sources. The first is data gathered by the United Nations that plots the price of food against time, the so-called food price index of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN. The second is the date of riots around the world, whatever their cause. Plot the data, and it looks like this:
Yet the cost of food hasnt quite yet risen to the catastrophic levels reached last year. Around the time of the riots cum-revolutions, we saw the food price index soar through 220 points and even push 240. This year, weve pretty consistently hovered in the 210-216 rangeright along the cusp of danger. But CSI expects a perilous trend in rising food prices to continue. Even before the extreme weather scrambled food prices this year, their 2011 report predicted that the next great breach would occur in August 2013, and that the risk of more worldwide rioting would follow. So, if trends hold, these complex systems theorists say were less than one year and counting from a fireball of global unrest.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)Kablooie
(18,632 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)when people are not hungry.
Response to GliderGuider (Original post)
littlemissmartypants This message was self-deleted by its author.
bigmonkey
(1,798 posts)I think.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:16 PM - Edit history (1)
I don't see actual global riots occurring for several decades, but then again, that doesn't mean we're not in dire straits; we are, and more regional riots(such as what happened in the Middle East) are pretty much inevitable, sad to say(and likely to become more widespread!). Even more tragically, this is a problem that could have been fixed long ago, but wasn't because of greedy interests such as Monsanto and others who raised profit above anything else, including the well-being of people, and this planet.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Words fail me. How much deliberate work does it take to become this resistant to reality?
NickB79
(19,236 posts)What the fuck do you think sparked the Arab Spring in the Middle East? Fucking riots over food prices.
Jesus Christ, how dense can people be?
On edit: this was meant for AverageJoe, not you GG
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)I didn't say that food riots didn't occur at all. C'mon, Nick, learn to read a little, and stop assuming stuff.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Admittedly, I was being a little optimistic, but I would like to point out that there haven't been any food riots in North America, Australia, Japan, or Europe yet........and I did take into account the possibility of improvement as well(on the other hand, the "if at all" part was a mistake, in retrospect, so I'll be correcting that.).
On the other hand, things very well could go down the shitter and we could be seeing riots in the rest of the world, too, like what has already occurred regionally in the Middle East, and parts of Africa and Asia. (I'm hoping that won't be the case)
Please try not to assume that I'm deliberately resisting anything. I do understand, very well, how dire things have already become in many parts of the world in terms of food & water shortages.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)And do you understand why the root causes mean that the direness will gradually spread to more and more affluent parts of the world?
And no, "Monsanto" isn't the answer. They are one issue, but they're not a root cause by any stretch of the imagination.
pscot
(21,024 posts)will do to the average American's food budget.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)reality is something for other people I guess.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)And give others the benefit of the doubt. Read the sub-threads between AverageJoe90 and me in the OP on McKibben before you cast too many aspersions. Things are not entirely as they first appear.
hunter
(38,311 posts)Animal feed prices will soar, the price of ground beef will plunge for a few weeks as dairies and feed lots sell off their livestock, and then all meat will be $12 dollars a pound and more.
It won't be so bad in the USA where more people will learn to eat less meat, but it will be absolutely wretched in places where people are poor and the diet is already largely vegetarian.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)but there was so much vacant land in the inner city that they just started a thousand community gardens instead.
I suspect riots are more likely where people depend on direct government intervention to ensure affordable, available food. Reducing bread subsidies is a perfect way to trigger food riots, for example.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)welfare. They want to live out their evil law-and-order fantasies, while destroying the lives of millions in the process. They WANT inner-city people to starve. They WANT martial law in the cities. They WANT America to complete the journey towards a police state.
Which is why they have to be stopped this November.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Its the corporations. The Republicans are just cheaper to manipulate. But everyone gets touched in a small way by the wealth of Wall St. Sadly, I believe your scenario is all too possible. Financed all the way by investments in the corporate dream of world domination & exploitation.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Maybe not for a few more decades, but it may indeed happen sooner than we think, which is why I sincerely believe that the time for action is NOW. Better to be cautious than sorry, IMHO.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Truth is, we're a pretty damned resilient species. I don't doubt there are rough times ahead but I should point out that we've survived disasters far worse(and far more sudden, I might add!) than global warming; if you can recall Toba, that one event wiped out about 95% of our ancestors, who not only had no time to prepare, but didn't know how to survive & adapt until it was too late. We have the advantage of thousands of years of accumulated knowledge.
The question that should be asked is, when are we going to shape up, and halt this disaster currently in progress? With all factors taken into consideration, will it be 3*C warmer by 2100 or 6 or 7?
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)NickB79
(19,236 posts)Hand it over.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Where's the "food riots"?
Animal House?
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)The report the story refers to was published last year. However a quote from the story says: "Even before the extreme weather scrambled food prices this year, their 2011 report predicted that the next great breach would occur in August 2013"
As far as I know, August 2013 is still almost a year in the future.
LouisvilleDem
(303 posts)Another Malthusian prediction bites the dust...
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Or just stalking by?
LouisvilleDem
(303 posts)...to better understand where your beliefs originate from, and whether you have shown any ability to alter your opinion when the evidence fails to back up your predictions.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)I've changed my position on a lot of things over the last 10 years: the severity of the post-peak downturn in oil supplies, the value of nuclear power and terra preta for combating climate change, the value of spirituality as a framework for understanding the universe, the likelihood that the world will adopt effective carbon controls, the nature of consciousness...
I'm actually very flexible. My current position is the result of change, as I recognized that the ongoing evidence didn't support my previous technologically based optimism. My previous position was that there were a large variety ways in which we could avoid a catastrophic outcome to the unfolding ecological crisis. Evidence showed me that position was unsupportable for a variety of reasons from technical insufficiency to a misunderstanding the nature of the human brain - so I changed.
My position is heavily based on science. I draw my supporting evidence thermodynamics, evolutionary biology, anthropology, evolutionary psychology and ecology.