Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 02:58 PM Sep 2012

We Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say

It looks like the future is just about here.

We Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say

What’s the number one reason we riot? The plausible, justifiable motivations of trampled-upon humanfolk to fight back are many—poverty, oppression, disenfranchisement, etc—but the big one is more primal than any of the above. It’s hunger, plain and simple. If there’s a single factor that reliably sparks social unrest, it’s food becoming too scarce or too expensive. So argues a group of complex systems theorists in Cambridge, and it makes sense.

In a 2011 paper, researchers at the Complex Systems Institute unveiled a model that accurately explained why the waves of unrest that swept the world in 2008 and 2011 crashed when they did. The number one determinant was soaring food prices. Their model identified a precise threshold for global food prices that, if breached, would lead to worldwide unrest.

The MIT Technology Review explains how CSI’s model works: “The evidence comes from two sources. The first is data gathered by the United Nations that plots the price of food against time, the so-called food price index of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN. The second is the date of riots around the world, whatever their cause.” Plot the data, and it looks like this:



Yet the cost of food hasn’t quite yet risen to the catastrophic levels reached last year. Around the time of the riots cum-revolutions, we saw the food price index soar through 220 points and even push 240. This year, we’ve pretty consistently hovered in the 210-216 range—right along the cusp of danger. But CSI expects a perilous trend in rising food prices to continue. Even before the extreme weather scrambled food prices this year, their 2011 report predicted that the next great breach would occur in August 2013, and that the risk of more worldwide rioting would follow. So, if trends hold, these complex systems theorists say we’re less than one year and counting from a fireball of global unrest.
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say (Original Post) GliderGuider Sep 2012 OP
oopsie phantom power Sep 2012 #1
So is that girl letting all the musicians out of the box? Kablooie Sep 2012 #25
I would also warn our all-too-clever leaders that pitting poor against poorer works ONLY.... Junkdrawer Sep 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants Sep 2012 #3
Bob Marley? bigmonkey Sep 2012 #6
Global riots are only theoretical thus far.....but only for now. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #4
OK, I'm changing my mind about you. GliderGuider Sep 2012 #5
They already occurred, back in 2007-2008 NickB79 Sep 2012 #7
No sweat, I figured that out pretty quick GliderGuider Sep 2012 #8
Yes, I know that. But that was a REGIONAL riot, not a global one. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #12
Should clarify a few things. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #9
Do you understand why things have become dire in many parts of the world? GliderGuider Sep 2012 #11
Ask him if he understands what a $10 loaf of bread pscot Sep 2012 #19
It is amazing isn't it. 4dsc Sep 2012 #22
Always keep an open mind. GliderGuider Sep 2012 #24
It'll happen quick in the USA. hunter Sep 2012 #10
I heard Detroit might have came close GliderGuider Sep 2012 #13
I find this to be very true, which is why I think the Republicans are desperate to torch..... AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #16
Totally, but it ain't just the Republicans. raouldukelives Sep 2012 #26
It very well could, sad to say. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #14
Wow... how awesome!!! truebrit71 Sep 2012 #15
Sadly, overshoot only ever ends one way. nt Speck Tater Sep 2012 #17
Not always for the absolute worst, though. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #27
You mean no more XemaSab Sep 2012 #18
We need it to make ethanol for the Hummers NickB79 Sep 2012 #20
Or, better yet, hemp oil. nt =D AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #28
Uh, this report is a *year* old Kolesar Sep 2012 #21
The story itself is 2 days old. GliderGuider Sep 2012 #23
Oh well LouisvilleDem Nov 2013 #29
Having fun? GliderGuider Nov 2013 #30
Just searching the archives... LouisvilleDem Nov 2013 #31
I think you will find such evidence if you look honestly. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #32

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
2. I would also warn our all-too-clever leaders that pitting poor against poorer works ONLY....
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 03:12 PM
Sep 2012

when people are not hungry.

Response to GliderGuider (Original post)

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
4. Global riots are only theoretical thus far.....but only for now.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 03:43 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:16 PM - Edit history (1)

I don't see actual global riots occurring for several decades, but then again, that doesn't mean we're not in dire straits; we are, and more regional riots(such as what happened in the Middle East) are pretty much inevitable, sad to say(and likely to become more widespread!). Even more tragically, this is a problem that could have been fixed long ago, but wasn't because of greedy interests such as Monsanto and others who raised profit above anything else, including the well-being of people, and this planet.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
5. OK, I'm changing my mind about you.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 03:50 PM
Sep 2012
"I don't see actual global riots occurring for several decades, if at all"

Words fail me. How much deliberate work does it take to become this resistant to reality?

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
7. They already occurred, back in 2007-2008
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:01 PM
Sep 2012

What the fuck do you think sparked the Arab Spring in the Middle East? Fucking riots over food prices.

Jesus Christ, how dense can people be?

On edit: this was meant for AverageJoe, not you GG

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
12. Yes, I know that. But that was a REGIONAL riot, not a global one.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:10 PM
Sep 2012

I didn't say that food riots didn't occur at all. C'mon, Nick, learn to read a little, and stop assuming stuff.



 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
9. Should clarify a few things.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:05 PM
Sep 2012

Admittedly, I was being a little optimistic, but I would like to point out that there haven't been any food riots in North America, Australia, Japan, or Europe yet........and I did take into account the possibility of improvement as well(on the other hand, the "if at all" part was a mistake, in retrospect, so I'll be correcting that.).

On the other hand, things very well could go down the shitter and we could be seeing riots in the rest of the world, too, like what has already occurred regionally in the Middle East, and parts of Africa and Asia. (I'm hoping that won't be the case)

Please try not to assume that I'm deliberately resisting anything. I do understand, very well, how dire things have already become in many parts of the world in terms of food & water shortages.



 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
11. Do you understand why things have become dire in many parts of the world?
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:09 PM
Sep 2012

And do you understand why the root causes mean that the direness will gradually spread to more and more affluent parts of the world?

And no, "Monsanto" isn't the answer. They are one issue, but they're not a root cause by any stretch of the imagination.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
24. Always keep an open mind.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 07:42 AM
Sep 2012

And give others the benefit of the doubt. Read the sub-threads between AverageJoe90 and me in the OP on McKibben before you cast too many aspersions. Things are not entirely as they first appear.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
10. It'll happen quick in the USA.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:07 PM
Sep 2012

Animal feed prices will soar, the price of ground beef will plunge for a few weeks as dairies and feed lots sell off their livestock, and then all meat will be $12 dollars a pound and more.

It won't be so bad in the USA where more people will learn to eat less meat, but it will be absolutely wretched in places where people are poor and the diet is already largely vegetarian.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
13. I heard Detroit might have came close
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:13 PM
Sep 2012

but there was so much vacant land in the inner city that they just started a thousand community gardens instead.

I suspect riots are more likely where people depend on direct government intervention to ensure affordable, available food. Reducing bread subsidies is a perfect way to trigger food riots, for example.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
16. I find this to be very true, which is why I think the Republicans are desperate to torch.....
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:19 PM
Sep 2012

welfare. They want to live out their evil law-and-order fantasies, while destroying the lives of millions in the process. They WANT inner-city people to starve. They WANT martial law in the cities. They WANT America to complete the journey towards a police state.
Which is why they have to be stopped this November.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
26. Totally, but it ain't just the Republicans.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:33 AM
Sep 2012

Its the corporations. The Republicans are just cheaper to manipulate. But everyone gets touched in a small way by the wealth of Wall St. Sadly, I believe your scenario is all too possible. Financed all the way by investments in the corporate dream of world domination & exploitation.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
14. It very well could, sad to say.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:13 PM
Sep 2012

Maybe not for a few more decades, but it may indeed happen sooner than we think, which is why I sincerely believe that the time for action is NOW. Better to be cautious than sorry, IMHO.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
27. Not always for the absolute worst, though.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:19 PM
Sep 2012

Truth is, we're a pretty damned resilient species. I don't doubt there are rough times ahead but I should point out that we've survived disasters far worse(and far more sudden, I might add!) than global warming; if you can recall Toba, that one event wiped out about 95% of our ancestors, who not only had no time to prepare, but didn't know how to survive & adapt until it was too late. We have the advantage of thousands of years of accumulated knowledge.

The question that should be asked is, when are we going to shape up, and halt this disaster currently in progress? With all factors taken into consideration, will it be 3*C warmer by 2100 or 6 or 7?

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
23. The story itself is 2 days old.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 07:18 AM
Sep 2012

The report the story refers to was published last year. However a quote from the story says: "Even before the extreme weather scrambled food prices this year, their 2011 report predicted that the next great breach would occur in August 2013"

As far as I know, August 2013 is still almost a year in the future.

LouisvilleDem

(303 posts)
31. Just searching the archives...
Sat Nov 16, 2013, 11:10 PM
Nov 2013

...to better understand where your beliefs originate from, and whether you have shown any ability to alter your opinion when the evidence fails to back up your predictions.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
32. I think you will find such evidence if you look honestly.
Sat Nov 16, 2013, 11:39 PM
Nov 2013

I've changed my position on a lot of things over the last 10 years: the severity of the post-peak downturn in oil supplies, the value of nuclear power and terra preta for combating climate change, the value of spirituality as a framework for understanding the universe, the likelihood that the world will adopt effective carbon controls, the nature of consciousness...

I'm actually very flexible. My current position is the result of change, as I recognized that the ongoing evidence didn't support my previous technologically based optimism. My previous position was that there were a large variety ways in which we could avoid a catastrophic outcome to the unfolding ecological crisis. Evidence showed me that position was unsupportable for a variety of reasons from technical insufficiency to a misunderstanding the nature of the human brain - so I changed.

My position is heavily based on science. I draw my supporting evidence thermodynamics, evolutionary biology, anthropology, evolutionary psychology and ecology.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»We Are Now One Year Away ...