Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,013 posts)
Wed Nov 7, 2018, 05:04 PM Nov 2018

Voters in three U.S. states reject initiatives to curb fossil fuel use

Source: Reuters

ENVIRONMENT NOVEMBER 7, 2018 / 11:23 AM / UPDATED 38 MINUTES AGO

Voters in three U.S. states reject initiatives to curb fossil fuel use

Liz Hampton, Nichola Groom
5 MIN READ

(Reuters) - Voters in Colorado, Arizona and Washington states rejected ballot initiatives that sought to curb fossil fuels use by restricting drilling, putting a fee on carbon emissions and mandating wider use of renewable energy.

The results were a setback for green activists, but a win for the energy industry and the Trump administration, which has sought to unfetter oil, gas, and coal production by rolling back environmental protections.

The outcomes showed “voters reject policies that would make energy more expensive,” said Thomas J. Pyle, president of free market advocacy group American Energy Alliance.

While polls had indicated rising concerns among Americans over carbon emissions and water quality, the measures on the ballot in the three states to rein in fossil fuels industries were soundly rejected on U.S. Election Day on Tuesday.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-energy/voters-in-three-u-s-states-reject-initiatives-to-curb-fossil-fuel-use-idUSKCN1NC29M

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voters in three U.S. states reject initiatives to curb fossil fuel use (Original Post) Eugene Nov 2018 OP
here is wash state a lot of the ads we saw were AGAINST it..very few ads for it.. samnsara Nov 2018 #1
Agreed. cilla4progress Nov 2018 #2

samnsara

(17,677 posts)
1. here is wash state a lot of the ads we saw were AGAINST it..very few ads for it..
Wed Nov 7, 2018, 05:07 PM
Nov 2018

..I voted for it only because the local Dem party did...but other than that I had not heard much it. There really needed to be more education about the issue.

cilla4progress

(24,850 posts)
2. Agreed.
Wed Nov 7, 2018, 05:09 PM
Nov 2018

Gov Inslee did an ad for, but was overwhelmed with ads against, "it will cost taxpayers..." blah blah.

Is that ALL these people jones for? How about breathable air, drinkable water...oh well, preaching to the crowd here.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Voters in three U.S. stat...