Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 02:00 PM Jan 2014

HSBC (Britain's largest bank) Restricts Large Cash Withdrawals

Following research last week suggesting that HSBC has a major capital shortfall, the fact that several farmer's co-ops were unable to pay back depositors in China, and, of course, the liquidity crisis in China itself, news from The BBC that HSBC is imposing restrictions on large cash withdrawals raising a number of red flags.
The BBC reports that some HSBC customers have been prevented from withdrawing large amounts of cash because they could not provide evidence of why they wanted it. HSBC admitted it has not informed customers of the change in policy, which was implemented in November for their own good:
"We ask our customers about the purpose of large cash withdrawals when they are unusual... the reason being we have an obligation to protect our customers, and to minimise the opportunity for financial crime."
As one customer responded: "you shouldn't have to explain to your bank why you want that money. It's not theirs, it's yours."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-24/bank-run-fears-continue-hsbc-restricts-large-cash-withdrawals

the article goes on to say that the bank claims this is an effort to prevent "financial crime"....
In truth, the bank has been charged with having 80 billion shortfall, in a report of last week.
"Large cash withdrawals" =3,000 pounds or more.

The Latest HSBC Scandal: An $80 Billion Capitalization Shortfall
Forensic Asia on Tuesday began its coverage of Britain’s largest banking group with a ‘sell’ recommendation, warning the lender had between $63.6bn (£38.7bn) and $92.3bn of “questionable assets” on its balance sheet, ranging from loan loss reserves and accrued interest to deferred tax assets, defined benefit pension schemes and opaque Level 3 assets.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-16/latest-hsbc-scandal-80-billion-capitalization-shortfall
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HSBC (Britain's largest bank) Restricts Large Cash Withdrawals (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jan 2014 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #1
uh, wtf, and ruh-roh. Warren Stupidity Jan 2014 #2
Shades of Corsica, eh? dixiegrrrrl Jan 2014 #3
Arrest the bankers. Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #8
Lol....good catch... dixiegrrrrl Jan 2014 #9
... Hush ... Ghost Dog Jan 2014 #11
2014 is 2008--the Sequel Demeter Jan 2014 #4
And when it hits dixiegrrrrl Jan 2014 #5
I'll be breathless with anticipation Demeter Jan 2014 #6
They're all going to retire to spend more time with their families. nt adirondacker Jan 2014 #7
They HAVE retired.....timing was everything. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2014 #10
Hah! I wish I could think ahead like that at times;) adirondacker Jan 2014 #12

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
8. Arrest the bankers.
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 12:08 AM
Jan 2014

Try them. Hang them (after they've returned our capital)..

... You mean, Cyprus, right, dixiegrrrrl? (We are well advised to leave La Corse well alone...)

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
4. 2014 is 2008--the Sequel
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jan 2014

Hang onto your hats. The astrologer says April. Since it was called the Cruelest Month by TS Elliott, I believe her.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
5. And when it hits
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jan 2014

Congress critters will all be standing around with dumb faces..
"no one could have forseeeeeeeeeen...."

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
6. I'll be breathless with anticipation
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 03:32 PM
Jan 2014

to hear what Rubin, Bernanke, Geithner and Lagarde and the rest have to say for themselves.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
10. They HAVE retired.....timing was everything.
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 01:04 AM
Jan 2014

LaGard...last I heard she was being investigated for some malfeance or the other.

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
12. Hah! I wish I could think ahead like that at times;)
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 01:18 AM
Jan 2014

Instead, I have at least a 20 year work schedule to attend to if I want to retire at 70.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»HSBC (Britain's largest b...