Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumBig ups for the Clinton organizers in Wyoming.
They fought Sanders to either a narrow 8-6 loss or maybe even a tie, 7-7, in delegates.
He needed to win 11-3.
Surrogate votes were the difference.
Democrats EVERYWHERE can make a difference.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)yes you're right!! Dems everywhere! Making a difference!
MattP
(3,304 posts)He finally got the spotlight he's been begging for
mcar
(42,329 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)So Sanders wins another tiny (the smallest!) caucus state.
One more state down, and no caucus states remaining.
No on to the clinchers - New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, California.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...and we're closer to the end. Sanders has to do better than gain 2 delegates every week.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)These caucus rules seem different in every state somehow.
78% reporting on CNN has 56.4% for Sanders to 43.6% for Clinton. That's not a giant lopsided margin, so how would that chop up the 14 state delegates?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)Kind of a nailbiter. lol
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)equals 1 delegate for approximately every 7% of the vote.
So, to get 8 delegates, you'd need about 56% of the votes.
George II
(67,782 posts)Even if Sanders were to pick up that one remaining delegate, that would put the Wyoming count at Clinton 10, Sanders 8 - including the emboldened Superdelegates who are expressing their dismay with the harassment they've been getting from the Sanders campaign and his minions.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...even if Clinton didn't get that last delegate, she STILL won Laramie County anyway!!!
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Absentee ballots are cheating.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Talks about it all the time, must be the revolution.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)How long until they demand we all show up with photo IDs to vote?
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I guess if it helps Bernie, it's ok. Early voting, absentee voting, many polling laces, no poll taxes, restrictive ID laws on voting - that's what Hillary and the Democratic party to which she belongs support. She has had her campaign lawyer support suits against ID voter laws, and in Arizona, she was probably the most hurt by the few polling places in a county where she statistically would have had the most votes.
But BS supports caucuses and now apparently don't want to give people who are unable to caucus a chance to vote. How Republican of them.
George II
(67,782 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)You guys did an unbelievable job!!!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)so he may "win" but she will have more delegates from the state combined.
Not a good showing for Sanders today!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)like myself, don't relish the idea of sitting in a room for hours, full of screaming college children, all hyped up on Red Bull & candy corn. I hope the state of NC never even contemplates switching from a primary to a caucus system. I think the primary system is far more democratic.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results
She got Goshen the last county to count.
woohoo!!!
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)It's not Hillary's fault that the Sanders campaign completely dropped the ball when it came to that. They were probably too busy shoring up their earlier wins. I'm guessing they are playing a week to week game.