Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumLive updates from Washington state’s Democratic caucuses pics and blogging
Live updates from Washington states Democratic caucuses
Originally published March 26, 2016 at 8:00 am Updated March 26, 2016 at 11:42 am
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/live-updates-from-washington-states-democratic-caucuses/
Treant
(1,968 posts)Then I can go depression-eat my dinner and prep for Alaska, then HI.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)They want to wait and get all votes in
book_worm
(15,951 posts)probably as well as Obama did in 2008. Oh well, HRC will still pick up delegates.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,956 posts)Odd way of picking delegates. There are 5 delegates in my precinct. 28 people showed up. 18 were for Sanders, 10 for Hillary Clinton.
Mathematically that would 3.2 delegates for Sanders 1.8 for Clinton but weird how they round it off. Instead of 3 to 2 they go 4 to 1.
Can you imagine the outcry from Sanders people if the votes were reverse for their candidate?
riversedge
(70,204 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,956 posts)and the winner gets the one that was split.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)To catch up in the pledged delegate count. I see they are demanding for the super delegates to go with the winner today, doesn't work that way. The super delegates relationships should have begun years ago, they are elected officials and former officials, they will not use the vote today to make their endorsement. If it is the results which matter then with Hillary having the most total vote in the primaries should endorse Hillary, it is we the people and the democratic way to go.
BlueMTexpat
(15,368 posts)We know that Bernie will win in WA and in AK. The only question is by how much. What I found encouraging in the write-up is that even those who support Bernie now have said that they will support Hillary in the GE, unlike some here on DU.
Those Sanders supporters who are literally "ordering" superdelegates to do their bidding are only hurting their candidate. The SD concept may be undemocratic, but it is in place for specific reasons and is a rule of the Democratic party.
I only know that in the highly unlikely event that I were ever a SD, having uninformed voters who were likely not even Democrats - or had only very recently become Dems - tell me what I MUST do would very likely make me do exactly the opposite if I had not already made my own mind up.
I also chuckled at the woman who said this: The difference between the two is Hillary is a seasoned politician. Thats an asset, but also a drawback. We end up with these compromises.
The ONLY full-time job that Bernie has had in his life is as a politician and that only began when he was 40 years old. After a short-term hiatus from politics (1989-1881), he has held political office in Washington, DC since 1991. Hillary held political office from 2001-2009.
That she is considered the "seasoned politician" of the two speaks volumes about her abilities. About his - hmmm!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Will take the title hands down. If it is the time as and elected official and i will throw in her time as SOS Sanders has three times in official time. Plainly spoken she has the ability, experience and strength to be president.
BlueMTexpat
(15,368 posts)I was merely chuckling at the "seasoned politician" quote. If anyone is a seasoned "politician," it is Bernie, who has had no other full-time job in his life than as an elected politician.
For most of her career, Hillary has been an activist who has played a significant role in contributing to meaningful change for the better for the most vulnerable among us. She is also a lawyer who excelled in private practice, a former First Lady of a southern state, a former FLOTUS, an elected US Senator, AND an effective and still globally respected former US Secretary of State. This all goes to show that she is by all objective measurements the best qualified individual in the 2016 race - hands down.