Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forum Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary
http://www.thenation.com/article/why-this-socialist-feminist-is-for-hillary/ For those of us on the left, the pressure to join the Bernie Express is intense. Friends and colleagues, casual Facebook acquaintances and lifelong political allies alike, all throw up their hands in despair or sneer in disgust if you dont pledge allegiance to the candidate whose strength and broad appeal in the primary has been both surprising and energizing to progressives used to holding our noses and voting for the lesser of two evils. Never mind that I will gladly vote and work for Bernie if he is the nominee, and I applaud the way he has pushed Hillary to the left. For refusing to back Bernie in the primary, Im a dupe and a traitor; Im a tool of (take your pick) imperialist, war-mongering, militaristic, in-the-pocket-of-Wall-Street corporate hacks.
So why do I support Hillaryand in the fairly resolute manner that I do? (Because, at the very least, serious leftists and feminists are supposed to carry our support with heavy hearts, wishing she were more like Elizabeth Warren and less like Margaret Thatcher.) Yes, Ive read most of the critiques of her, and, yes, Im aware of her record and her complex, often vexing history. But I am no more ambivalent about her than I am about any American politician who will inevitably be found wanting in any number of crucial ways.
Heres why: I want a woman presidentand, no, not any woman president. Hillary is not, as her detractors would have it, Margaret Thatcher or Carly Fiorinaor Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann, or some other female candidate whose platform rests on antipathy to any feminist concerns. Like most in the Democratic Party, she is a centrist. In her political orientation, deep intelligence, and policy wonkishness, she is similar to Obamaand not as dissimilar to Bernie as one might imagine. Still, I support her less for her specific political positions (some of which I agree with, many of which I do notall of which are far superior to the racist/sexist/xenophobic sideshow that is the Republican primary field) than for the iconic value of electing the first woman president of the United States.
...
Hillary may not be the radical, intersectional feminist that activistsmyself includedfantasize about seeing in power. But shes some kind of a feminist for sure, and her election would no doubt foreground the centrality of gender equity to social justice in ways we have not yet seen at a national level. And visibility matters: Its substantively different to have a woman president advocating for gender equality as opposed to having a man do so, just as it is to have a black president advocating for racial justicebecause gender and racial difference live in and through our marked bodies. This is why, for example, the struggles for affirmative action and diversity remain so pertinent to all aspects of social, political, and educational life. Its unlikely that Bernies redistributive economic policies, admirable as they are, would ever make their way through Congress. How is a leftist agenda that remains little more than a vision better for women than actually having a woman (who has, dont forget, an agenda that shares much in common with this vision)after all these yearsin the Oval Office?
Hillary as president will not usher in a profound realignment of US priorities and politics. No electable mainstream candidate will do thatsee Obamas legacy if you have any doubts. But she just might help us remember that feminist isnt an epithet; its a badge of honor.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 607 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary (Original Post)
Stuckinthebush
Feb 2016
OP
pandr32
(11,581 posts)1. Awesome!
What so many don't recognize is that Sec. Clinton has been a feminist for decades. Her winning the presidency shatters the highest glass ceiling there is. She would lead with her hand extended to others to help them up. She wins--we all win. Equality will help all of us. It is a lofty goal, but only she is qualified and dedicated enough to get us there.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)2. "he wins--we all win. Equality will help all of us."
Well said!!!!