HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Hillary Clinton (Group) » Sanders Requests KY Revie...

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:26 PM

Sanders Requests KY Review(Hillary Group)

http://bigstory.ap.org/042a334061664e0ca202ccfe0a2ffab6

I'm presenting this utterly without comment as I'm beyond words at the moment.

Edited: I said Recount, and meant Review. A recount isn't a review, and the article explains this.

30 replies, 1887 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 30 replies Author Time Post
Reply Sanders Requests KY Review(Hillary Group) (Original post)
Treant May 2016 OP
redstatebluegirl May 2016 #1
shenmue May 2016 #2
savalez May 2016 #7
Historic NY May 2016 #3
MADem May 2016 #9
Walk away May 2016 #24
Cha May 2016 #4
puffy socks May 2016 #27
TwilightZone May 2016 #5
SunSeeker May 2016 #6
workinclasszero May 2016 #8
Cha May 2016 #12
workinclasszero May 2016 #13
Cha May 2016 #19
sarae May 2016 #14
Cha May 2016 #20
yallerdawg May 2016 #10
Cha May 2016 #22
George II May 2016 #11
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 #15
SharonClark May 2016 #16
JSup May 2016 #17
beachbumbob May 2016 #18
Surya Gayatri May 2016 #21
Walk away May 2016 #23
sufrommich May 2016 #25
still_one May 2016 #26
Iliyah May 2016 #28
LiberalFighter May 2016 #29
jmowreader May 2016 #30

Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:27 PM

1. What a bunch of cry babies!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:30 PM

2. Criminy pete

What does he not understand?

You don't sue the umpire after the baseball game is over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to shenmue (Reply #2)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:43 PM

7. He's a lot like Trump.

Suing and whining all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:34 PM

3. Most at stake is one delegate....

perhaps Sanders ought to shoulder the cost.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #3)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:44 PM

9. There it is. He should pay if he wants the state to play.

This is just getting to the point of noxious churlishness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #9)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:15 PM

24. Getting? I'm pretty sure they are using Bernie's photo next to the definition "Churlish"

In all of the online dictionaries.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:37 PM

4. He's already lost by how much?! And, he's going for perhaps a lost delegate in Kentucky

that he needs to find?

Delegate math: How Clinton wraps up nomination by June 7

REACHING 2,383

After a strong April finish that put her 91 percent of the way to the nomination, Clinton was slowed by a lighter primary schedule and wins by Sanders in Indiana, West Virginia and Oregon. She still picked up more than 45 percent of the delegates at stake in May. That's because Democrats award delegates in proportion to the vote, so the loser receives some.

Clinton is 78 delegates short.

In the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico, Clinton is likely to grab around 40 delegates. That will leave her shy by more than 30, heading into June 7.

With 126 pledged delegates at stake, New Jersey offers Clinton more than what she needs to clinch - even if she were to lose the state.

Also voting June 7, in order of poll close times: North Dakota, South Dakota, New Mexico, Montana and California. A total of 694 delegates are up for grabs.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107143384

So who's he kidding?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #4)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:24 PM

27. "So who's he kidding?"

 

His blind and loyal supporters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:38 PM

5. I'm ok with this. The problem is that the only time he ever sees these problems is when he loses.

The review really isn't the issue. The hypocrisy is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:40 PM

6. OFFS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:44 PM

8. Sanders is the biggest sore loser of all time!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to workinclasszero (Reply #8)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:54 PM

12. ..



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #12)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:57 PM

13. I love that! :D

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to workinclasszero (Reply #13)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:06 PM

19. Somehow that's the one

that fits.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #12)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:58 PM

14. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarae (Reply #14)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:07 PM

20. Remind you of somebody?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:52 PM

10. He's following the Trump model of outrageous behavior!

Back in the news!

'True believers' praising his tenacity!

He is going to fight - for every last dollar!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to yallerdawg (Reply #10)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:10 PM

22. lol..

lol don't you mean "delegate"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:53 PM

11. More money pissed down the drain. Even if there were errors (there will be, there ALWAYS are)....

...it will change one or two delegates.

He just wants to keep his finger in the pie and stir shit up. Maybe it will enable Tad and Jeff (and Jane) to keep their paying jobs a little be longer - wring a few more measly bucks out of their supporters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:01 PM

15. Seriously Bernie?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:02 PM

16. I doubt he cares about the one delegate

He wants to establish a history of fraud or other misdeed as the cause of his losses. He thinks it will help him delegitimize Hillary's victory and discourage voter turnout.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:02 PM

17. I hope whatever they find...

...that explains the 'zomg votes zeroed out in Pike!' is shouted loud and clear; using television adjustments to their typoed numbers (or whatever) isn't fraud.

When I was a kid and playing a game I didn't know the rules to I always thought people were cheating; some of these people remind me of me playing my first Blackjack game: "What? I had 23! I beat you!".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:06 PM

18. Wasting time and money..did sanders learn that from Jane or

Did Jane learned that from Bernie?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:07 PM

21. This is just a publicity stunt to keep himself on the front page for free.

 

Remember, he doesn't even have enough money left to buy ad space in CA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:10 PM

23. Something tells me this pathetic grasper is going to spend the month of June and beyond...

litigating every state that he lost, desperately mining for delegates that will never add up to enough.

I am also guessing that Joe and Mika will be the only ones in the media who bother talking about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:17 PM

25. This makes no sense.What does it get him?

What a ridiculously vain person he has become.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:22 PM

26. That is his choice. As I understand it the cost for candidate-initiated recounts in Kentucky are

paid entirely by the initiator:


"Cost for Candidate-Initiated Recounts:
Paid entirely by initiator
Initiator pays deposit or bond before recount

Candidates must pay a bond before the recount, for all costs associated with the recount, in an amount to be determined by the Circuit Judge. See KRS 120.095 and 120.185."

http://ceimn.org/ceimn-state-recount-laws-searchable-database/states/Kentucky

Whatever it is, someone will have to pay for it, and it won't change anything

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:40 PM

28. I read it's a review not a recount which cost nada



But still, it's his way of keeping his face in the media.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 02:52 PM

29. Let it happen. My guess is there will be one of two outcomes.

1) The results remain nearly the same and the issue was related to the AP that was collecting and reporting the data.

2) It involves two different counties. One of which would not impact the district delegate count. The other could possibly change one delegate at both the district and state level but not the PLEO delegates.

I look for it to be 1). And Sanders with egg on his face. In public.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Treant (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:07 AM

30. It looks like they're going for bulk states won, and not worrying about delegates

Apparently in his mind, the more states he wins, the more control he has over the convention and over Hillary's platform once the election officially shifts into general election mode.

That he actually got stomped down hard during primary season is immaterial at this point. His intent is to force Hillary to run on a socialist platform.

His biggest problem, naturlich, is there are enough undeclared superdelegates floating around for Hillary to clinch the nomination this instant if they wanted to declare for her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread