Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumThen and now....Q polls
Tayara Vaknin ?@tayaravaknin 38m38 minutes ago
Tayara Vaknin Retweeted Rick Klein
This time in 2012
(Q polls) OH: Obama 45 - Romney 44 FL: Obama 43 - Romney 44 PA: Obama 47 - Romney 39
Fascinating
Tayara Vaknin added,
Rick Klein @rickklein
good morning,
Q poll. FL: Clinton 43 Trump 42. OH: Clinton 39 Trump 43. PA: Clinton 43 Trump 42
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 853 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Then and now....Q polls (Original Post)
Henhouse
May 2016
OP
spooky3
(34,452 posts)1. Sorry--I don't know what Q polls are?
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)2. Quinnipiac pollsters...
regarding this one, I read on Twitter (fwiw) that they included less POC in their sample than turned out to vote in 2012. They do have a rep for oversampling white voters, which in general is why Romney actually thought that he was winning in 2012 right through to Election Day.
spooky3
(34,452 posts)3. Thank you!
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)4. Shhhh. We don't want folks to know that. nt
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)5. Excellent eom
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)6. Yes, exactly. nt