Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 01:36 PM Feb 2012

John Harwood, NYT: Obama's tax policy targets the rich.

WASHINGTON — Partisan clashes over President Obama’s proposed tax increases have obscured something remarkable: that the affluent Americans targeted by his policy represent a growing share of his own party’s base.

You would not know it from Republican cries of class warfare swirling around Mr. Obama’s new budget, which reiterates his calls for higher taxes on individuals earning more than $200,000 and households earning more than $250,000. Conventional understanding of election-season populism assumes that the president will be looking to stick it to die-hard Republicans.

snip

To make the point that he is not lashing out at opponents, Mr. Obama often notes that his proposals would raise his own taxes or those of allies like Warren Buffett, the billionaire investor. But the Democratic Party’s increasing electoral success in upper portions of the income scale points to something broader: an argument that people like him have a civic responsibility to bear more of the burden of deficit reduction and to pay for government spending priorities.

“It is the opposite of a pander,” said Dante Chinni, the director of Patchwork Nation. And it carries risks as well as potential rewards.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/us/politics/obamas-tax-policy-targets-slice-of-his-base-the-affluent.html?ref=politics

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Harwood, NYT: Obama's tax policy targets the rich. (Original Post) DevonRex Feb 2012 OP
It is where the money is. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #1
Yes it is. DevonRex Feb 2012 #4
"Mitt Romney paid 13.9%. What percentage did you pay last year?" DCKit Feb 2012 #2
Yep. And DevonRex Feb 2012 #3
the first Democrat in modern history to advocate an increase in taxes during an election year grantcart Feb 2012 #5
I think so, too. DevonRex Feb 2012 #6
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/03/18/buffetts-goldman-bet-reaps-8-7-billion-gain/ samfarkus Mar 2012 #7
Your link doesn't work. DevonRex Mar 2012 #8
 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
2. "Mitt Romney paid 13.9%. What percentage did you pay last year?"
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 03:00 PM
Feb 2012

That's about all he needs to ask the 99%.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
3. Yep. And
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 04:13 PM
Feb 2012

one thing I like is that even though wall street doesn't like his proposals, it's actually becoming trendy for other wealthy people to say they are willing to pay higher taxes. They want to separate themselves from WS and the republicans.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
5. the first Democrat in modern history to advocate an increase in taxes during an election year
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 02:00 PM
Feb 2012

Pretty significant.
 

samfarkus

(10 posts)
7. http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/03/18/buffetts-goldman-bet-reaps-8-7-billion-gain/
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:28 PM
Mar 2012

divining the motives of ultra-wealthy people isn't difficult.
Goldman Sachs was a huge recipient of the federal bailouts

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»John Harwood, NYT: Obama'...