Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:20 PM Dec 2012

“Oh crap,” he said. “A lot of things could go wrong.”

Shale drillers eager to move wastewater on barges

Benjamin Stout, a biology professor at Wheeling Jesuit University about 60 miles southwest of Pittsburgh, is one expert who didn’t know about the Coast Guard’s review.

“Oh crap,” he said. “A lot of things could go wrong.”

For example, wastewater contains bromides. Bromides transform into carcinogens when they are pumped through water treatment facilities, Stout said.

If there was a barge accident, the treatment facilities would have to shut their intake valves of river water, he said. Cities such as Pittsburgh and Wheeling use water from the Ohio River for drinking.
...
via http://publicsource.org/investigations/shale-drillers-eager-move-wastewater-barges
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Oh crap,” he said. “A lot of things could go wrong.” (Original Post) limpyhobbler Dec 2012 OP
Yes, but it's worth all the risk, because the drilling will make rich people richer, and that's valerief Dec 2012 #1
They won't use "richer" argument No Vested Interest Dec 2012 #4
Millions of tons of hazardous material have been transported on the doc03 Dec 2012 #2
Yeah there must have always been some toxic stuff on the barges. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #3
Guess none of these chemicals count... Ikonoklast Jan 2013 #5

valerief

(53,235 posts)
1. Yes, but it's worth all the risk, because the drilling will make rich people richer, and that's
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:32 PM
Dec 2012

the most important thing in the world.

doc03

(35,328 posts)
2. Millions of tons of hazardous material have been transported on the
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:32 PM
Dec 2012

Ohio river for decades before fracking was even heard of. I drink the water myself.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
3. Yeah there must have always been some toxic stuff on the barges.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:48 PM
Dec 2012

Certainly tons and tons of coal. Used to watch the stuff float by.

I'm not sure if maybe this stuff is any worse because of the radioactive ingredients.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
5. Guess none of these chemicals count...
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:38 PM
Jan 2013
http://outreach.lrh.usace.army.mil/Industries/Chemical/default.htm


Ohio River Basin Barge Traffic

Top Chemicals – 2008

(values in millions of $)

Chemical
Tonnage
Value

OTHER HYDROCARBONS
2,760,511
$428

NITROGENOUS FERT
1,553,746
$149

ALCOHOLS
1,372,681
$633

SODIUM HYDROXIDE
773,399
$63

POTASSIC FERT
600,487
$98

NITROGEN FUNC COMP.
334,366
$1,461

ORGANIC COMP NEC
326,099
$383

INORG ELEM OXIDES & HALOGEN SALTS
298,689
$117

FERT & MIXES NEC
286,058
$512

CARBOXYLIC ACIDS
283,194
$226

Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterborne Commerce Statistics




Agendas....
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Ohio»“Oh crap,” he said. “A lo...