Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 02:28 PM Aug 2014

Earthquake concerns prompt call to shut nuclear plant



Shut Diablo Canyon, federal expert advises
A senior federal nuclear expert is urging regulators to shut down the state's last operating nuclear plant, at Diablo Canyon on the central coast, until they can determine whether the facility's twin reactors can withstand powerful shaking from any one of several nearby earthquake faults.

Michael Peck, who for five years was Diablo Canyon's lead on-site inspector, says in a 42-page, confidential report that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is not applying the safety rules it set out for the plant's operation.

The document does not say the plant itself is unsafe. Instead, according to Peck's analysis, no one knows whether the plant's equipment can withstand strong shaking from nearby faults.

In many cases, Peck notes, the potential for such shaking was discovered after Diablo Canyon was built.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Earthquake-concerns-prompt-call-to-shut-nuclear-5711717.php?cmpid=twitter-premium&t=4ce89978913c100abe
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
1. It won't happen until they figure out a way to replace the 1400
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 02:34 PM
Aug 2014

jobs that PG & E provides this county. This is the cork in progress that has caused our county board of supervisors to look the other way every time activists try to get the plant decommissioned.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
3. They are both serious concerns.
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 02:49 PM
Aug 2014

If we get a big earthquake the used fuel rods are also at risk yes, but if we have a tsunami the whole plant is at risk.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
4. I don't think a tsunami is a big risk. The plant is too far above sea level,
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 02:57 PM
Aug 2014

and there's that huge, solid vertical ocean facing cliff as a buffer.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
5. I hope you are right, but a big earthquake can reorganize the landscape
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 03:09 PM
Aug 2014

and if it lowers it..... I saw such a thing in Alaska where the 1964 earthquake dropped a whole forested valley into the sound bringing it to sea level. It was a 9.2. You know anything above 7.5 for Diablo Canyon will compromise the plant and probably the canyon itself.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Earthquake concerns promp...