Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumCalifornia will restrict asset seizures by police
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article105017791.htmlGov. Jerry Brown on Thursday signed legislation limiting the civil asset forfeiture process that allows police to seize property from suspected criminals.
Senate Bill 443 will require California law enforcement agencies to obtain convictions in order to keep property taken during criminal investigations even when working jointly with federal authorities that do not share that obligation....
Brown signed the measure without comment. It was a long-in-the-works priority of state Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, and civil liberties advocates, who have accused police of abusing the process to pad their budgets.
The bill, which would have originally eliminated the exception for large amounts of cash, initially failed last year under heavy lobbying from law enforcement groups, who say it is a valuable tool to undercut large criminal enterprises by cutting off their financing. A deal struck in the final weeks of session last month revived SB 443 and allowed it to sail through the Legislature with overwhelming support.
Senate Bill 443 will require California law enforcement agencies to obtain convictions in order to keep property taken during criminal investigations even when working jointly with federal authorities that do not share that obligation....
Brown signed the measure without comment. It was a long-in-the-works priority of state Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, and civil liberties advocates, who have accused police of abusing the process to pad their budgets.
The bill, which would have originally eliminated the exception for large amounts of cash, initially failed last year under heavy lobbying from law enforcement groups, who say it is a valuable tool to undercut large criminal enterprises by cutting off their financing. A deal struck in the final weeks of session last month revived SB 443 and allowed it to sail through the Legislature with overwhelming support.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1226 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California will restrict asset seizures by police (Original Post)
KamaAina
Sep 2016
OP
Good, but I'd say it doesn't go far enough. There shouldn't be any threshold where
petronius
Sep 2016
#3
winetourdriver
(196 posts)1. About time
When cops act like thieves it sets a bad example, to say the least.
Jim__
(14,075 posts)2. That is very good news! - n/t
petronius
(26,602 posts)3. Good, but I'd say it doesn't go far enough. There shouldn't be any threshold where
this is allowed: no conviction* no seizure, IMO...
* I.e., prove beyond the shadow of doubt that the property was criminally-derived.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)4. agreed. nt