Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,788 posts)
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:03 AM Dec 2011

DU3 - so far not a fan

Okay it has only been 10 minutes but this is like re-learning how to walk.

No videos on the main page
"Soapbox"
NO CONSPIRACY THEORIES?!?!?!?

Don't like the twitter and other boxes on each post.

No sig lines?

All right all right I will just get used to it

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DU3 - so far not a fan (Original Post) underpants Dec 2011 OP
Agreed. oldironside Dec 2011 #1
Well, comparing it to Freerepublic is a bit harsh, but holy cow are these bugs super obvious. TheEuclideanOne Dec 2011 #90
Personally, I'd roll back to DU2 and fix this puppy before making it "live" Amerigo Vespucci Dec 2011 #99
Same here - Just by including the entire community in the pain of testing will not help. TheEuclideanOne Dec 2011 #100
I wish it had more color. Too much white. kayakjohnny Dec 2011 #2
Thanks - I knew there was something else underpants Dec 2011 #6
More color. Page looks too sterile. Graybeard Dec 2011 #17
Did the smiley's disappear? MedicalAdmin Dec 2011 #101
They didn't disappear. But they are now hard to find. kayakjohnny Dec 2011 #102
Thanks.... MedicalAdmin Dec 2011 #105
Front Page gone from the best to one of the worst LiberalLovinLug Dec 2011 #61
It needs some blue. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #83
yes!! Chiquitita Dec 2011 #96
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Dec 2011 #3
Agreed ,it's a nanosecond old. orpupilofnature57 Dec 2011 #4
Words to the Wise: If it ain't broke, don't break it. leveymg Dec 2011 #5
I just went back to retrieve my sig line underpants Dec 2011 #8
I want my Journal back. I know it's archived, but I want it brought back to life. leveymg Dec 2011 #13
How do you get back? My link to DU2 is now a link 1monster Dec 2011 #24
Here underpants Dec 2011 #27
Thank you! 1monster Dec 2011 #40
Thank you indeed- Thought I'd have to find another way to GoneOffShore Dec 2011 #58
how do you go back? StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #86
I agree Not a fan of this change Rene Dec 2011 #19
I was thinking the same thing about all the empty space underpants Dec 2011 #22
The concept behind it is more democratic tavalon Dec 2011 #25
I like the DU2 upgrade underpants Dec 2011 #28
Not sure yet hobbit709 Dec 2011 #7
I don't like it either.. Oldenuff Dec 2011 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Dec 2011 #10
Or we will. hobbit709 Dec 2011 #12
The missing features will get programmed? TheEuclideanOne Dec 2011 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Dec 2011 #78
Sorry Tesha, I thought you were part of the web team, actually. TheEuclideanOne Dec 2011 #88
Hate it nt kevm1550 Dec 2011 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Dec 2011 #14
I'm posting to see what my post looks like BeyondGeography Dec 2011 #15
HATE. And the STUPID WHITE SPACE to the left?? Very unpleasant. WinkyDink Dec 2011 #16
Yeah! Those ads showing the sickly calf and the butchered pigs were a lot better. Arkansas Granny Dec 2011 #21
The white space is good design. That way on wider monitors... originalpckelly Dec 2011 #29
have you tried classic view? Kali Dec 2011 #42
I don't see a difference. Graybeard Dec 2011 #47
in standard there is a menu at the left and then further down white space Kali Dec 2011 #55
Go to your "My Accounts" button and click "Classic" to tblue37 Dec 2011 #92
What were they thinking? AirmensMom Dec 2011 #18
Thinking? Oldenuff Dec 2011 #20
! Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #31
I like some things onlyadream Dec 2011 #23
Are there any deeply nested threads yet? octothorpe Dec 2011 #35
On my phone... TeeYiYi Dec 2011 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Dec 2011 #79
The only format available... TeeYiYi Dec 2011 #87
I tried it out here: Duer 157099 Dec 2011 #51
I'm with ya Highway61 Dec 2011 #26
It is a step in the right direction... originalpckelly Dec 2011 #30
I Need My Pictures!!! Blacksheep214 Dec 2011 #32
Smileys still work underpants Dec 2011 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Dec 2011 #80
Where do you find the spell check? sarcasmo Dec 2011 #33
THAT I have not been able to find underpants Dec 2011 #39
Good to know I am not the only one. sarcasmo Dec 2011 #85
Skinner says it will be programmed in soon. nt tblue37 Dec 2011 #94
I agree with you on the social media icons... Those take up too much real estate for what they are.. octothorpe Dec 2011 #34
You oughta see them on a phone... TeeYiYi Dec 2011 #44
I HATE the twitter/facebook etc buttons. noamnety Dec 2011 #36
Where is the socialism forum? Fantastic Anarchist Dec 2011 #37
All y'all complaining about a lack of color supernova Dec 2011 #41
The front page usta be something to look forward to opening. Cheesie Aaria Dec 2011 #45
home page bongo_x Dec 2011 #46
its giving me a headache Knicks007 Dec 2011 #48
Some folks would complain pscot Dec 2011 #49
My problem is that I have a strong visual orientation nolabear Dec 2011 #50
Hate the front page at the moment... JCMach1 Dec 2011 #52
I'm with you. I really loved DU2, I really hate change. Curmudgeoness Dec 2011 #53
Can't stand it. No links. No easy news page. WTF. I'm taking a break. byronius Dec 2011 #65
That is what I miss the most. Curmudgeoness Dec 2011 #68
I agree. The Front Page was a great entry point and summary. Prana69 Dec 2011 #76
Well, at least I found the page I need for recent activity Curmudgeoness Dec 2011 #77
I'm withholding my judgement for now. GoCubsGo Dec 2011 #54
I should have withheld judgement too underpants Dec 2011 #56
The "Most Rec'd" button will be the new "greatest" page. tblue37 Dec 2011 #93
DU3 Lacks warmth. It literally glares like an overcast day... AikidoSoul Dec 2011 #57
see post #64 ;) nt PunkinPi Dec 2011 #70
I'm willing to give it a chance but agree the visuals were better before, mahina Dec 2011 #59
You're not allowed to not like it! Get a grip! :P helderheid Dec 2011 #60
Lol! RobertBlue Dec 2011 #95
I've tried for over 15 minutes and I'm still not russspeakeasy Dec 2011 #62
I like it..but Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2011 #63
emoticons here ---> PunkinPi Dec 2011 #64
Thanks! Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2011 #69
You're welcome! :) nt PunkinPi Dec 2011 #71
OK, but how do you GET there? trof Dec 2011 #73
I. Hate. It. Dem2theMax Dec 2011 #66
Is the Lounge now spread over different groups like humor, weird news and entertainment ? /nt jakeXT Dec 2011 #67
it has a real Children of the Corn feel MisterP Dec 2011 #72
I agree. I HATE the new DU! No color, no videos, too hard to find anything, boring for newcomers Liberty Belle Dec 2011 #74
Not happy so far-but nowhere else to go. Maccagirl Dec 2011 #81
Cant get classic view unless you donate. Not cool. erodriguez Dec 2011 #82
I do not think it is as attractive as DU2. femmocrat Dec 2011 #84
They have had their Facebook moment. They have repaired something in NO NEED of REPAIR! RushIsRot Dec 2011 #89
First check in this weekend, and so far, not a fan Lifelong Protester Dec 2011 #91
Not liking it either. It de-emphasize user input with the loss of unrec and new main page layout is pam4water Dec 2011 #97
A cold, visually unappealing beta version of something that eventually might be good Amerigo Vespucci Dec 2011 #98
mediocrity eventually happens to all internet sites....guess it is DU's turn. cbdo2007 Dec 2011 #103
I agree. What I find really strange is that DUs Classic look is only available to paid members. snagglepuss Dec 2011 #106
The front page is not changing. Are only staff selected story showing? pam4water Dec 2011 #104
fantastic improvement MindMover Dec 2011 #107
It feels very compartmentalized. backtoblue Dec 2011 #108
DUkick Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #109

TheEuclideanOne

(2,487 posts)
90. Well, comparing it to Freerepublic is a bit harsh, but holy cow are these bugs super obvious.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 12:37 AM
Dec 2011

I could totally understand it if they were subtle issues that only the hard-core users could notice, but the gazillian issues that fall into the category of "Wow, if they tested this feature even 1 time, it would be noticed" are the ones that surprise me. Seriously, who in their right mind decided to bring this system live?

There must be some major breakdown in the development team and project management side of things. Did somebody accidentally delete all of the original source code? Did Skinner threaten the developers by saying that he is going to bring the site live, no matter how many bugs are in the system, perhaps some type of shaming approach or negative reinflorcement?

Right now, the dev team is probably in a panic and sleeping by their computers. I imagine that this "bring it live" excersize is causing people to spend a whole lot of time that they would not normally spend.

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
99. Personally, I'd roll back to DU2 and fix this puppy before making it "live"
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:14 AM
Dec 2011

But it's not my call, and it's not my Website.

But so far, it's tasting like "New Coke," and that's going to make it hard to turn this into an ongoing cash proposition. It needs to be fixed before it has a monthly fee attached to it.

TheEuclideanOne

(2,487 posts)
100. Same here - Just by including the entire community in the pain of testing will not help.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 11:43 AM
Dec 2011

Maybe the thought is that if you make it live and force people to try to use it, they will give the quickest feedback, but that will not lead to anything good. For the really blatant things like, "The signature does allow images", as an example, it does not help to have 100 people posting things like "WTF?!?!? The Signature line does not work!". Obvious things like that should be done and then let us give feedback on the finer points.

Just roll it back until the dev team is done. Wasting everybody's time in beta testing it is not going to turn out like I think you are expecting. Yes, this is a tight-knit community, but don't take advantage of that to use as a way to do the testing for the web team. Hire testers, finish the site, then bring it live.

What the heck, Skinner, did you outsource it to some company in India where they told you that they can put 100 people on the job for the price of 1 person at US rates and that there is no way it could fail without all of that manpower?

kayakjohnny

(5,235 posts)
2. I wish it had more color. Too much white.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:12 AM
Dec 2011

Even Youtube managed to get a new look.

Throw some other color options into the mix.

MedicalAdmin

(4,143 posts)
101. Did the smiley's disappear?
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 11:55 AM
Dec 2011

I can't find them and they were good for things like sarcasm, satire, and just letting people understand the 90 of communication that doesn't come through the written or spoken word.

I am not a fan so far. Not that my opinion counts because I can't afford it right now anyway.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,173 posts)
61. Front Page gone from the best to one of the worst
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:33 PM
Dec 2011

You mentioned YouTube. Yes it seems like with faster speeds, higher bandwidth, bigger monitors etc...other sites are adapting by making their sites MORE visually based functionality. DU has decided to go backwards to a time where text based sites were the norm.

DU was ahead of their time with their DU2 Front Page. Soon other sites like YouTube have caught up. Why oh Why are they now going back to a tired boring 1990's type-based design? It is horrible, but I'm willing to give it time to see how it looks after all the feedback.

Response to underpants (Original post)

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. Words to the Wise: If it ain't broke, don't break it.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:14 AM
Dec 2011

DU3 is a mess. What's the point of messing with something that worked so well?

underpants

(182,788 posts)
8. I just went back to retrieve my sig line
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:16 AM
Dec 2011

and literally let out a *sigh* when I saw the old site.

well we will see

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
13. I want my Journal back. I know it's archived, but I want it brought back to life.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:34 AM
Dec 2011

What's the point of this DU3 exercise - to save on bandwidth?

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
58. Thank you indeed- Thought I'd have to find another way to
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:27 PM
Dec 2011

rebuild my ignore list.

Not that you're there.

Rene

(1,183 posts)
19. I agree Not a fan of this change
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:02 AM
Dec 2011

What was broken?....it was so easy to peruse thru du2 and pick articles of interest. I'm thinking the white space is reserved for future advertisers

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
25. The concept behind it is more democratic
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:39 AM
Dec 2011

We are all going to be responsible for its functioning. It reminds me of OWS. Less oligarchy, more participant driven.

If you were here for the advent of DU2, you might remember it had growing pains but turned out really well. I think we should give this one a chance to mature.

underpants

(182,788 posts)
28. I like the DU2 upgrade
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:53 AM
Dec 2011

I thought it was an immediate improvement. This ...will take some getting used to.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
7. Not sure yet
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:14 AM
Dec 2011

I can't find anything without going through everything, some things appear to be lost-at least temporarily, new color scheme hard on my eyes. Oh well, I was spending way too much time on DU anyhow. Maybe I'll find something more productive to do.

 

Oldenuff

(582 posts)
9. I don't like it either..
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:23 AM
Dec 2011

But I'll lay a bet that our opinions won't change...well...the change.It's kinda like trying to stop the War on "some" drugs.Fat chance that anybody is going to listen...specially after spending countless hours building a spiffy (?) new site.

Bah humbug.


Hey!!!

We FINALLY got some doggone change now didn't we?..never mind that we seem to be going backwards tho.

Response to Oldenuff (Reply #9)

TheEuclideanOne

(2,487 posts)
75. The missing features will get programmed?
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 08:42 PM
Dec 2011

You might have thought to finish the site before moving the test site to production. Is there an email list, where you can tell us that you are finished testing the site and we can come back?

Response to TheEuclideanOne (Reply #75)

TheEuclideanOne

(2,487 posts)
88. Sorry Tesha, I thought you were part of the web team, actually.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:53 PM
Dec 2011

Maybe it was the posts of yours. My bad, sorry.

Yeah, I am sure alot of people are working hard now. Definitely not the smoothest transition, I can tell you that since I build websites, usually for very large corporations, so I can see all of the signs of mistakes that have been made. And, if I didn't, there are apparently many others helpfully reminding them.

They appear to be on the wrong track, but hopefully they will get back on track and clean up this mess. If this app were in beta, it would be a world of difference in the situation.

Response to kevm1550 (Reply #11)

Arkansas Granny

(31,516 posts)
21. Yeah! Those ads showing the sickly calf and the butchered pigs were a lot better.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:16 AM
Dec 2011

It's different, but I think we'll get used to it pretty quickly. It's just going to take a little time to learn how to navigate.

originalpckelly

(24,382 posts)
29. The white space is good design. That way on wider monitors...
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:00 AM
Dec 2011

you don't have to read a single line of text that should be a nicer neater paragraph. That was one major problem on DU2.

Kali

(55,007 posts)
55. in standard there is a menu at the left and then further down white space
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:03 PM
Dec 2011

also the thread/reply boxes/posts are off-set to the right, in classic view that menu disappears and the thread/reply boxes/posts go all the way to the left hand side of the screen (menu is then accessed from the tabs at the top of the page)

tblue37

(65,340 posts)
92. Go to your "My Accounts" button and click "Classic" to
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 03:49 AM
Dec 2011

get a view that uses up all that white space on the left. I use the Classic mode, and I have no white space on the left at all.

AirmensMom

(14,642 posts)
18. What were they thinking?
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:48 AM
Dec 2011

This is a typical "Improvement" that is actually anything but. Truly ugly. It never would have passed my usability team. Sorry they wasted a year on it. It sucks.

 

Oldenuff

(582 posts)
20. Thinking?
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:02 AM
Dec 2011

It kinda reminds me of Microsoft releasing os before they were ready...and not making very many friends,or furthering loyalty in the process.

Sorry to say it...especially since there are people who prolly worked really hard...but,it does stank.

And like I said before,we will likely have it forced down our throats anyway...kinda like asking for a good candidate,and instead we get...well,you know.


And I agree with Hobit709,I was spending too much time here anyway.

onlyadream

(2,166 posts)
23. I like some things
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:28 AM
Dec 2011

When reading the posts, it was difficult to keep track of who replied to who. Now it's easier with the indenting. But I Miss the home page with the quick news... Maybe I missed it, so I'll keep looking.

octothorpe

(962 posts)
35. Are there any deeply nested threads yet?
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 12:02 PM
Dec 2011

I'm curious how that will look when you have replies going 100 deep.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
43. On my phone...
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 12:58 PM
Dec 2011

...the nested replies had one word and then single letter paragraphs. Then they just disappear and
I
can't
access
the
hid
den
r
e
p
l
i
e
s
.

TYY

Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #43)

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
87. The only format available...
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:20 PM
Dec 2011

...is Mobile. You have to have a star to use Standard or Classic. Hopefully that will change to at least one other option. Mobile view works like hell on my phone.

Fyi, the nested replies have been fixed since beta testing last week. They don't look that bad now. I checked it today.

Thanks for trying to help.

TYY

 

Blacksheep214

(877 posts)
32. I Need My Pictures!!!
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:14 AM
Dec 2011

And if you could make them pop-ups it would be cool!

Where the hell did the Smileys button go? I needed a smiley! AARRRGGGHHH!!!

Response to underpants (Reply #38)

octothorpe

(962 posts)
34. I agree with you on the social media icons... Those take up too much real estate for what they are..
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 12:01 PM
Dec 2011

I think they should be much smaller or at least hidden until specifically unhidden for use.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
44. You oughta see them on a phone...
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 01:08 PM
Dec 2011

They're HUGE! ...and trying to scroll and navigate around them on a tiny touch screen is like tiptoeing through a minefield.

TYY

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
36. I HATE the twitter/facebook etc buttons.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 12:14 PM
Dec 2011

They are huge and intrusive, they interrupt the flow of the conversation.

supernova

(39,345 posts)
41. All y'all complaining about a lack of color
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 12:30 PM
Dec 2011

Please remember that black text/white background is the most comfortable for people with sight difficulties. There are accessibility issues to think about.

Now you can program customizations so that users can chose their color schemes, but it is work and probably more than Elad can do right now.

bongo_x

(49 posts)
46. home page
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 01:19 PM
Dec 2011

I mostly only use the home page. I hope there is going to be something there. I’m finding the new site confusing, I’m not sure what I’m looking for or where it is.

Knicks007

(73 posts)
48. its giving me a headache
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 03:42 PM
Dec 2011

old format was better. This is a terrible re-design. Soapbox is idiotic. Go back to GD/GDP.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
49. Some folks would complain
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 03:48 PM
Dec 2011

If they were hung with a new rope. I'm not crazy about the new look, but I guess I'll get used to it, since I have to.

nolabear

(41,960 posts)
50. My problem is that I have a strong visual orientation
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 03:55 PM
Dec 2011

Seeing the News Feed and those short first paragraphs, and the videos displayed on the Front Page excites my curiosity and triggers my memory far more than a line of text. The sterility and cool design doesn't make me want to click through to stories.

Forums aren't as big a problem but what usually gets me to the site in the first place is that when I hear a headline I know I'll see something about it on DU immediately and check out the discussions following.

It might make a real difference in the number of times I come in.

(Although I always do get a chuckle out of the exclamation mark on "Post my reply!&quot

JCMach1

(27,556 posts)
52. Hate the front page at the moment...
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 04:08 PM
Dec 2011

although I assume that is coming soon as well.

Reminds me of the malls in the UAE when they open them with much of the work still to go.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
53. I'm with you. I really loved DU2, I really hate change.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 04:16 PM
Dec 2011

But....I will get used to this.

I never have understood why things that are working so well get changed. Like a grocery store deciding to move all the aisles every few years....and I just go to the store that never makes changes instead or learning all the new setup. Why????????

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
68. That is what I miss the most.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 06:20 PM
Dec 2011

I continually would go to the "front page" to see the most recent posts to see what was new. And having that page got me into many forums that I would not have visited, but was glad that I did.

Prana69

(235 posts)
76. I agree. The Front Page was a great entry point and summary.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:11 PM
Dec 2011

I miss the videos. It was easy to see what was a video compared to text, how long the video was and a brief overview. I would open 6-8 in new tabs and work my way through them depending on how much time I had to spare.

Now, every entry is just a line item. I can't see what is a video, and I can't see how long it is.

I don't like it.

But in replies, I do like being able to see to whom a reply is directed rather than "In reply to Post #432".

P69

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
77. Well, at least I found the page I need for recent activity
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:20 PM
Dec 2011

with a little help from my friends. Latest Threads is the tab to get to it and what is nice is that you can choose to look at latest threads, or most rec'd, or most active. I guess that I like it. I have yet to stumble onto the video issue, but I can't help but think they will get that sorted out. I hope so.

GoCubsGo

(32,080 posts)
54. I'm withholding my judgement for now.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 04:38 PM
Dec 2011

Some of the things I miss are supposedly going to show up soon, like "hide thread". However, I am not sure what you are talking about when you say "No sig lines?" I see them in the main thread, in light grey text. But, not in the posts to which I am replying.

One thing I do agree with you on is the "Soapbox" thing. I think GD/GDP was a better way to arrange things. And, since there is no "Greatest Pages", I see no point to the "recs". Or, the Twitter, etc. Otherwise, I like having the different forums and subscriptions on the sidebar. And, outside of the lack of unrecs, and the jury thing, I don't see to many differences between here and the old format.

underpants

(182,788 posts)
56. I should have withheld judgement too
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:16 PM
Dec 2011

I wasn't aware of the ability to add sig lines -whoops

I think there should be two GD's as well

tblue37

(65,340 posts)
93. The "Most Rec'd" button will be the new "greatest" page.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 03:54 AM
Dec 2011

Click "latest threads" --> "most rec'd" to get to it.

AikidoSoul

(2,150 posts)
57. DU3 Lacks warmth. It literally glares like an overcast day...
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:25 PM
Dec 2011

Looks like underpants found the smilies but damned if I can see them anywhere.

mahina

(17,651 posts)
59. I'm willing to give it a chance but agree the visuals were better before,
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:28 PM
Dec 2011

esp being able to view latest, GD, Greatests by timeline and # of recs.

However I seem to recall bitching about DU2 conversion at least to myself. (Started reading daily after I saw the Democraticunderground.com banner on CSPAN at *'s coronation parade, the dark day Jan 21 2001, but lurked till 03.)

I see the rationale behind the process changes. If you guys are here, I am here. I'm sure it will improve. The fonts are ugly looking but I'll try to change that on my side.

And I miss my Obama bodysurfing pic oh well!

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
63. I like it..but
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:38 PM
Dec 2011

for the life of me I can't find the smileys. I also don't like the social media icons. Other than that, it's pretty good.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
72. it has a real Children of the Corn feel
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 07:23 PM
Dec 2011

and still no ignores or unrecs, so it's going to have even more Dem rightwingers

DU2 was a place where you felt more comfortable speaking out--now it's a well-lit, well-monitored THX 1138

it's basically sub-Kos--unhomely, unsightly, unusable, suspicious security guards all around

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
74. I agree. I HATE the new DU! No color, no videos, too hard to find anything, boring for newcomers
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 08:17 PM
Dec 2011

Skinner why mess with success? The old DU was so much better looking and easier to use than this! I know you guys put time into this but it looks honestly like amateur hour compared to the great site you had before. Please bring it back!!!

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
84. I do not think it is as attractive as DU2.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:57 PM
Dec 2011

Last edited Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:43 PM - Edit history (1)

I don't like the junk down the left side of the screen. I don't like the colors... BOOOORING!
I don't like those distracting little twitter things at the bottom of the posts.

And where the hell are the smilies?!

:frown: :grumpy: :negativenellie: (I just made those ones up. )

On edit: And I can't find my old avatar!!! It was the Wisconsin-Fist with the word "solidarity".

RushIsRot

(4,016 posts)
89. They have had their Facebook moment. They have repaired something in NO NEED of REPAIR!
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:54 PM
Dec 2011

In so doing, they have made it worse instead of better.

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
91. First check in this weekend, and so far, not a fan
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 01:32 AM
Dec 2011

The opening page looks like any other web/blog/message board.

TOO BLAH! and not too intuitive for navigation.

*sigh* and that facebook and twitter stuff at the bottom. Really? Do we need that?

pam4water

(2,916 posts)
97. Not liking it either. It de-emphasize user input with the loss of unrec and new main page layout is
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 09:57 AM
Dec 2011

goofy. There's still a LOL catz thread on the main page. UD2 fit on my monitor almost completely without scrolling and had more information on it. When I'm looking at new threads, I don't like have to waste time sifting through sports post. I'm worried the sight going the way of Huffington Post.

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
98. A cold, visually unappealing beta version of something that eventually might be good
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 10:11 AM
Dec 2011

Layout is "clean" but "fugly" (no visual appeal at all).

I'm not convinced that the new navigation is "user friendly." My personal feeling is that in an attempt to organize it, things just got a little more confusing.

No polls, no custom siglines, no custom avatars, all things we're told will be coded "in the near future," which could mean anything, but when you roll out a semi-functional "new version," it's a beta, just like a pig is bacon.

I don't see a lot of support for the forum name "Soapbox."

Not entirely sure of what parts will be available to paying customers and what will be included in the "free" version.

So far, I'm missing DU2. Change is good, but only when it's a good change.





cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
103. mediocrity eventually happens to all internet sites....guess it is DU's turn.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 02:45 PM
Dec 2011

Really, the message board before was beautiful. It was the exact format I wished most other message boards out there would take up because it was fairly easy to browse through.

I'm guessing before it was more of a "home based" approach and now they've hired a bigger web design company to give them something useless and generic.

Who knows, maybe I'm in the minority, I guess hits and $$$ will be the judge but I'll probably visit less just because it's so ugly now. The saying Keep It Simple Stupid should be what's on everyone's mind when doing web design. Too much of it is done for the sake of the programmers than for the customers.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
106. I agree. What I find really strange is that DUs Classic look is only available to paid members.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 05:13 PM
Dec 2011

What attractd me to DU was the striking look of Classic, very appealing, friendly and inviting. If the Classic look is available for star members I am dumbfounded why it's not the default. Come January when my subscription ends I'll stop visiting as I unfortunately will not be able to afford the yearly rate and, as I don't have a credit card can't do the $5 monthly rate. A lot posters have made very derisory comments about people not liking change but when people are under enormous stress the smallest change can be unbearable.

backtoblue

(11,343 posts)
108. It feels very compartmentalized.
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 05:48 PM
Dec 2011

You have to be careful where you post what and I don't like the twitter and facebook boxes, either.

And...R.I.P. my lil sig man....

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»DU3 - so far not a fan