Seth Meyers - Guest Rep. Jamie Raskin Was Startled by the Outcome of Trump's Second Impeachment

[Rhiannon12866]

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) discusses leading Donald Trump's second impeachment and shares what he thinks could have changed the outcome of the trial.

[JudyM]

1. Thanks for posting this, Rhiannon.

Again raises the question whether there is any standard of conduct whatsoever for these repukes... certainly their oath meant nada.

[Rhiannon12866]

2. Exactly. That's what I really don't get at all

If what happened on January 6th wasn't enough, what does it take?! But then we've all heard Ron Johnson, he violates his oath in practically everything he says and he's far from alone. And what I can't help wondering is how much of the nightmare of 2020 could have been avoided if only Trump had been removed, as he should have been, after the first impeachment a year before. The managers also did a compelling job back then and the evidence was there.

[JudyM]

3. It's party over country for an astounding proportion of them. They are all bought. Proud puppets

who proselytize amoral fictions under the cloak of supreme righteousness. At the immeasurable expense of humanity and the planet. It’s astonishing there isn’t more unleashed public outrage. At least we are finally shining bright lights in their corners...

Wondering who’s going to have the stomach to run against him (or against one of his anointed) in ‘24.

Meanwhile 47% of repug men don’t intend to get the vaccine.