Commander in Chief

[Segami]

Progressive foreign policy group the Truman National Security Project today released a new ad that features several 9/11-era veterans questioning whether Mitt Romney is qualified to be commander-in-chief.

The one minute video first highlights Romney’s various foreign policy fumbles throughout the campaign, including his confusing Afghanistan policy, his failure to mention the war there and commemorate U.S. troops in his RNC speech, and his campaign’s reluctance to talk about national security. “You have shown us from London to Libya that you are over your head,” an Army vet says, with the ad closing with three other vets saying they don’t trust Romney to lead the military. Watch it:

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/04/964241/truman-ad-veterans-romney/

[Dawson Leery]

1. Mitt Romney is "Unfit For Command".

[freshwest]

2. +1

[freshwest]

3. Strong piece, Segami. thanks for bringing it here.

[SamKnause]

4. Commander of Lies

Thank you for speaking out veterans !!!!

Romney is not qualified to be Commander in Chief.

He has repeatedly proven himself to be untrustworthy and incompetent on foreign affairs.