HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Exposing 2016 Democratic ...

Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:25 PM

Exposing 2016 Democratic Election Fraud through Exit Polls Interview Richard Charnin

5 replies, 1975 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply Exposing 2016 Democratic Election Fraud through Exit Polls Interview Richard Charnin (Original post)
leftcoastmountains Apr 2016 OP
All in it together Apr 2016 #1
kadaholo Apr 2016 #2
zeemike Apr 2016 #3
Enthusiast Apr 2016 #4
PotatoChip Apr 2016 #5

Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:57 PM

1. This election fraud is disgusting

It's time to clean up the elections and have paper trails for every election so that recounts can be done. Also no voting machines and fancy footwork with sending votes out to be tabulated in secret. And Non- proprietary, open sourced counting machines.

Bernie should speak up even though Hill & Bill will scream sore loser.

And to add confusion and tricks some NY poling places won't open until noon, to make it harder to vote and depress voting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:05 PM

2. INCREDIBLE EXPOSE!

FABULOUS POST! PLEASE K & R TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:36 PM

3. Yep and it is all in your face.

Because it can be and we are so whipped that they know full well that we are afraid to say anything...even those who claim to be on the left will call us CTers and ridicule us for saying it.
And it is coming in this thread and we all know it.

But it is like Stalin said, it is not how people vote but who counts the votes. And the ruling class not only counts the votes but they tell us it is all good and fair when it is far from that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 06:09 AM

4. Wouldn't we like to know the ACTUAL election results of this primary election.

I know the good guys from the bad guys. This time it couldn't be any more obvious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 09:17 AM

5. While the man in the video acknowledges that the discrepancies

in THIS primary go far beyond any he has ever seen, he did mention noticing some similarities to what happened with President Obama in the 08 primary.

So out of curiosity, I began googling. I decided to first check out the 08 NY primary results, since that is the state next up on the calendar. It is the only state I've checked so far, yet lo and behold...

Hmmm.


New York Democratic primary, 2008

Vote discrepancies

After the votes were initially counted on election night, certain districts near New York City were found to be missing their vote tallies for Obama. [2] The New York Times conducted a review of the unofficial results from the primary. They found that, among New York City's 6,106 election districts participating, 80 districts did not record a single vote for Obama, including heavily black districts like Harlem, as well as districts next to others where Obama had very favorable results. City election officials reviewed the vote tallies and found several inaccuracies. For example, in Harlem where Clinton led Obama 141 to 0, the recounted vote was counted as 261 to 136, Clinton.[3] In Brooklyn the primary night vote was 118 to 0, Clinton, whereas the recounted vote went 118 to 116, Clinton.[3]

Democratic leaders blamed the discrepancies on "human error" due to weary election officials on primary day. According to ABC News, however, other candidates such as John Edwards did not have this problem; it seemed to be almost exclusive to Obama.[4]
The counting errors only occurred in the election night tallies, which are always unofficial. Following normal procedures, the votes were re-tallied before being officially certified.[5] The final, official results left Clinton with 139 pledged delegates to the 2008 Democratic National Convention and Obama with 93.[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Democratic_primary,_2008

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread