Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 05:25 PM Jun 2012

NDAA banned: Indefinite detention of Americans 'unconstitutional'



A Federal judge in the US has ruled Washington cannot indefinitely detain Americans suspected of having terrorist ties unless they have been found in connection with the September Eleventh attacks. It comes just six months after President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, which would have allowed American citizens to be held without trial or charge. The judge initially ruled the act was unconstitutional last month, but the Obama administration asked her to reconsider the ruling. Attorney Carl Mayer says the act threatened Americans' basic freedoms.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NDAA banned: Indefinite detention of Americans 'unconstitutional' (Original Post) The Northerner Jun 2012 OP
Thank you Judicial Branch Savannahmann Jun 2012 #1
Welcome to the boards cbrer Jun 2012 #3
Now if we can only cbrer Jun 2012 #2
Obama needs to fire whoever has been advising him. This was never going to fly with sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #4
Good Points made there, Sabrina.... KoKo Jun 2012 #5

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
4. Obama needs to fire whoever has been advising him. This was never going to fly with
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 09:02 PM
Jun 2012

anyone concerned about human rights in this country, least of all Democrats. It's a shame, because during the campaign he was eloquent on these issues, on Bush's abuses of the Constitution. That is what got my support, his apparently clear understanding of the Constitution which was a breath of fresh air after the soul destroying years of the Bush administration.

But this is a victory for the people, and it's sad that the president, who many of us expected to restore the rights taken away by the Bush gang, should be in this position today. He needs new advisers as quickly as he can find them.

The judge is right too, btw, the AUMF and all the other Bush policies pushed through after 9/11 were meant to deal only with people directly connected to 9/11.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. Good Points made there, Sabrina....
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 10:58 PM
Jun 2012


"anyone concerned about human rights in this country, least of all Democrats. It's a shame, because during the campaign he was eloquent on these issues, on Bush's abuses of the Constitution. That is what got my support, his apparently clear understanding of the Constitution which was a breath of fresh air after the soul destroying years of the Bush administration."
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»NDAA banned: Indefinite d...