What Happened When Scientists Re-Tested Climate Change Denier's "Science"?

[matthewf]

[underpants]

1. Watching later

[tnlurker]

2. For Later reading

[longship]

3. Unfortunately, Natasha is not very good at this.

Too much stumbling. The host tries to rescue her a couple times, but to no avail.

This is not a good interview.

Sorry.

[SwissTony]

4. A link to the paper

http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/545/art%253A10.1007%252Fs00704-015-1597-5.pdf?originUrl=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs00704-015-1597-5&token2=exp=1441899793~acl=%2Fstatic%2Fpdf%2F545%2Fart%25253A10.1007%25252Fs00704-015-1597-5.pdf%3ForiginUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Flink.springer.com%252Farticle%252F10.1007%252Fs00704-015-1597-5*~hmac=2f5415688edc691edde8e2abcfcceb40d66342b88c38cfff5a559b10131b62b9

A nice summary piece by Natasha Geiling

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/08/26/3695477/climate-scientists-cant-recreate-bad-science/

She comes over better in print than on camera.