Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumRachel Maddow - Hastert indictment raises questions of further charges
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1392 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow - Hastert indictment raises questions of further charges (Original Post)
Galraedia
May 2015
OP
It's very weird that the expert Rachel interviews didn't look up the information
mucifer
May 2015
#4
mucifer
(23,565 posts)1. I know that in Chicago there is a statute of limitation on
police torture. This was the insanity of the jon burge case. I would think there would be a statute of limitation on what hastard allegedly did many years ago.
The system sucks.
Baitball Blogger
(46,758 posts)3. Taking the Catholic priest pedophilia cases into account,
I don't think there is any statute of limitation.
mucifer
(23,565 posts)4. It's very weird that the expert Rachel interviews didn't look up the information
about statute of limitations before he went on tv.
Baitball Blogger
(46,758 posts)2. It raises the question why this didn't occur sooner.
I bet people knew about the abuse earlier and did nothing. I bet the tipping point was embezzlement of money. I bet if he had his own money, there still wouldn't have been an indictment.