Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,023 posts)
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:06 AM Apr 2013

Proposed soda ban likely to backfire, study finds

After New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg unveiled his plan to ban the sale of sodas larger than 16 ounces, comedian Jon Stewart complained that the proposal "combines the draconian government overreach people love with the probable lack of results they expect."

It turns out the "Daily Show" host was on to something.

New research shows that prompting beverage makers to sell sodas in smaller packages and bundle them as a single unit actually encourages consumers to buy more soda — and gulp down more calories — than they would have consumed without the ban.

Not only would thirsty people drink more, but circumventing the big-drink ban by offering consumers bundles of smaller drinks also would mean more revenue for the beverage purveyors, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE. The sales boost would probably offset the added cost of producing more cups, lids and straws to hold those extra drinks, the researchers found.

The results reveal "a potential unintended consequence that may need to be considered in future policymaking," wrote the study authors, psychologists from UC San Diego.

full: http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr/11/science/la-sci-small-sodas-20130411

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Proposed soda ban likely to backfire, study finds (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2013 OP
Any time you limit our freedom to do dumb things Warpy Apr 2013 #1
Bloomie is a 1%er control freak using his money to control us ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #7
The law of 'unintended consequences:' elleng Apr 2013 #2
Denying yourself something only makes it more desirable. dkf Apr 2013 #3
Bad symbology. Hopefully his gun control efforts will erase that silly enterprise. onehandle Apr 2013 #4
Don't worry, it won't ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #6
UCSD Pshchology Dept? JayhawkSD Apr 2013 #5

Warpy

(111,256 posts)
1. Any time you limit our freedom to do dumb things
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:14 AM
Apr 2013

You should expect a backlash of one type or another, either massive civil disobedience making the law unenforceable or the emergence of a black market.

You want less of anything, tax it. You want more of anything, subsidize it.

Get it, Mayor Bloomberg? Thundering "THOU SHALT NOT" from your mayor's desk is just not going to work, ever.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. Bad symbology. Hopefully his gun control efforts will erase that silly enterprise.
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:32 AM
Apr 2013

What am I saying?

Total gun control is an eventuality, with or without Bloomberg.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
6. Don't worry, it won't
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:00 PM
Apr 2013

Bloomie will fade away soon enough. Even his 1%er money and attitude cannot thwart the will of the people over time

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
5. UCSD Pshchology Dept?
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 01:26 AM
Apr 2013

I would take anything these people publish with a large dose of salt. They have published some really goofy stuff.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Proposed soda ban likely ...