Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZProgressive

(29,322 posts)
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 06:04 PM Nov 2021

Why does the media keep saying this election was a loss for Democrats? It wasn't

Pretty much anything that happens to the Democrats is a sign that they’re weak and losing and should be worried, according to the storylines into which mainstream media tends to stuff news. Pretty much nothing, including losing, seems to signify that the Republicans are losers. In so habitually and apparently unconsciously fitting a wide array of new and varied facts into familiar old frameworks, the media shape the political landscape at least as much as they report on it.

It’s in the language. The New York Times editorial board thunders that “Democrats deny political reality at their own peril” and then insists that this election in which a moderate lost is a sign that the party needs to get more moderate. Bloomberg News found a way to make a victory sound like defeat: “Phil Murphy clung on to win a second term as New Jersey’s governor, surviving by a narrow margin.” It was about the same margin by which a Republican won the Virginia governorship, but the language around that was apocalyptic (though Virginia usually elects a governor who’s in the other party than the president, and New Jersey – which not long ago gave Republican Chris Christie two terms – re-elected its first Democratic governor in decades on Tuesday).

According to the Washington Post, which seemed to believe that Virginia was a national referendum on the party: “Democrats scramble to deflect voter anger.” The verbiage that followed was stuffed with the emotive language of a pulp novel, though it was presented as news: “An off-year electoral wipeout highlighted the fragile state of the party’s electoral majorities in the House and Senate. But a new round of bitter recriminations threatened to dash Democratic hopes of quickly moving past the stinging defeats.” Fragile, bitter, stinging. Wipeout, dash, defeat. It is true that Terry McAuliffe lost, and also true that he was a corporate centrist who, reportedly, ran a lousy campaign; it’s also true that he is not the Democratic party, and the nation didn’t vote in Virginia’s election.

As for this week’s election, it swept in a lot of progressive mayors of color. The most prominent was Michelle Wu, who won the Boston mayor’s seat as the first woman and first person of color. Elaine O’Neal will become Durham, North Carolina’s, first Black woman mayor, and Abdullah Hammoud will become Dearborn’s first Muslim and Arab American mayor. Aftab Pureval will become Cincinnati’s first Asian American mayor. Pittsburgh elected its first Black mayor, and so did Kansas City, Kansas. Cleveland’s new mayor is also Black. New York City elected its second Black Democratic mayor, and Shahana Hanif became the first Muslim woman elected to the city council (incidentally, New York City and Virginia have about the same population). In Seattle, a moderate defeated a progressive, which you could also phrase as a Black and Asian American man defeated a Latina. A lot of queer and trans people won elections, or in the case of Virginia’s Danica Roem, the first out trans person to win a seat in a state legislature, won reelection.

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/06/democrats-election-victory-loss-media-republicans

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PortTack

(32,764 posts)
2. I for refuse to watch or subscribe to any news outlet that does this. At this point, it's pretty
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 06:11 PM
Nov 2021

Much all of them

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. I can't help thinking it's because Democrats keep saying how terrible it is...
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 06:12 PM
Nov 2021

at least some of them are crying about how we've lost everything. And those who whine the loudest have dome the least to help out.

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,011 posts)
4. Remember the 2018 hot takes about how the Dems underperformed?
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 06:26 PM
Nov 2021

Then all the California races were decided a week later and we'd picked up what, 40 seats?

c-rational

(2,592 posts)
5. They are attempting to define the narrative as they have for decades. Ask the same stupid
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 06:27 PM
Nov 2021

question, over and over, e.g. about Hillary, or paint a false picture as they did after 2018. We did have a blue wave.

Uncle Joe

(58,356 posts)
8. So long as one remembers that the corporate media
Sat Nov 6, 2021, 11:24 PM
Nov 2021

Last edited Sun Nov 7, 2021, 12:51 AM - Edit history (1)

is the CORPORATE media; it all pretty much explains itself over time if one pays attention.


Thanks for thread AZProgressive

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Why does the media keep s...