Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 11:11 AM Jan 2021

BlackRock Inc, may have raked in $2.4 billion on GameStop's retail-driven stock frenzy

BlackRock Inc, the world's largest asset manager, could have made gains of about $2.4 billion on its investment in GameStop Corp as retail investors pour money into the video-game retailer's shares.

The asset manager owned about 9.2 million shares, or a roughly 13% stake, in GameStop as of Dec. 31, 2020,
a regulatory filing showed on Tuesday.

Assuming no change in BlackRock's position, the value of its stake would be worth $2.6 billion now, compared with $173.6 million as of December.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idINKBN29W22T

Thanks Kids!!
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BlackRock Inc, may have raked in $2.4 billion on GameStop's retail-driven stock frenzy (Original Post) Budi Jan 2021 OP
They would need to sell (which I doubt they could) zaj Jan 2021 #1
What goes up, must come down. 5X Jan 2021 #2
Short sellers are slime The Mouth Jan 2021 #3
Disagreed 1000000% Lucky Luciano Jan 2021 #4
Nope The Mouth Jan 2021 #5
 

zaj

(3,433 posts)
1. They would need to sell (which I doubt they could)
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 11:27 AM
Jan 2021

Thanks for sharing, because I wondered who might be profiting off this, but if they don't choose to sell, then the framing of this article/headline is really rather pointless.

Lucky Luciano

(11,254 posts)
4. Disagreed 1000000%
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 01:31 PM
Jan 2021

Shortsellers are policing the markets.

They can put a check on exuberance and also on fraud.

Sometimes shorting is not so much that you think a stock will go down per se, but that it will underperform relative to another. One might buy $X of Google and sell short $X of Microsoft if one thinks Google should outperform Microsoft, but are uncomfortable calling a specific direction. Not unreasonable at all.

Shortsellers are also natural buyers when the market tanks (unless they are manipulative sellers trying to cause a loss of confidence) and can start to be the first buyers after a big enough drop to lock in profits.

Now, shortsellers who don’t care about their execution price, but just want to drive down a price with manipulative selling to cause others to lose confidence (Bear Stearns comes to mind) - yes, that’s scum along with any kind of manipulation.

The Mouth

(3,149 posts)
5. Nope
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 06:21 PM
Jan 2021

I'm happy as hell to see these bastards get hammered. Right along with the insane gamblers who use margins, may they end up holding 'will work for food' signs.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»BlackRock Inc, may have r...