Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(131,291 posts)
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 10:33 PM Oct 2020

Trump's Sanctions on International Court May Do Little Beyond Alienating Allies.

'Critics say the administration has targeted a human rights lawyer with economic penalties meant for warlords, dictators and authoritarian governments. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo came to the State Department briefing room ready to punish.

On Sept. 2, he took to the lectern and called the International Criminal Court — which investigates war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide — a “thoroughly broken and corrupted institution.” Then he announced sanctions on the tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, and a colleague, trying to stop their inquiry into potential war crimes by American forces in Afghanistan.

His measure enraged European allies, human rights activists and even some retired American generals. Many were angry that the Trump administration aimed economic penalties meant for warlords, dictators and authoritarian governments at a human rights lawyer.

“It definitely is quite unprecedented,” Ms. Bensouda said in an interview. “These are the kind of sanctions that we normally reserve to be used as a mechanism to target narcotic traffickers, notorious terrorists and the like. But not professional lawyers, not prosecutors, not investigators, not judges or others who are working tirelessly to prevent atrocity crimes.”

The Trump administration has said that since the United States is not a member of the Hague-based international court, Ms. Bensouda does not have the authority to look into American activities abroad. Mr. Pompeo has denounced its inquiries as “illegitimate attempts to subject Americans to its jurisdiction.” The court’s appeals chamber has issued a ruling disputing that.

Many diplomats and experts on sanctions policy also said Mr. Trump’s use of such punishment against the I.C.C. not only weakened the country’s moral standing, but also revealed a troubling trend: The Trump administration has transformed economic sanctions, one of the government’s most effective foreign policy tools, in ways that have alienated close allies.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/world/europe/trump-sanctions-international-criminal-court.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's Sanctions on International Court May Do Little Beyond Alienating Allies. (Original Post) elleng Oct 2020 OP
That should be assumed to be one of his primary goals.... RockRaven Oct 2020 #1
Trump pardoned a SEAL and an Army Lt for war crimes. keithbvadu2 Oct 2020 #2
K&R Solly Mack Oct 2020 #3

keithbvadu2

(37,008 posts)
2. Trump pardoned a SEAL and an Army Lt for war crimes.
Mon Oct 19, 2020, 12:13 AM
Oct 2020

Trump pardoned a SEAL and an Army Lt for war crimes.

In the long run, Trump will be gone and it will be: 'America condones war crimes'.

Whenever America brings up enemy war crimes, they will have a ready-made response.

Donald has given them a strong propaganda tool.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump's Sanctions on Inte...