Putting Even More Con in Conservative ( Paul Ryan )
Jonathan Chait has an excellent piece on Paul Ryan, which shows not just that hes a fake deficit hawk now, but that he always was he was an enthusiastic supporter of all of Bushs budget-busters, spending as well as taxes.
Yet, as Chait also says, Ryan is still still beloved by centrists, who get very annoyed when someone (i.e., me) points out the fraudulence. How can this be?
Chaits main answer is that reporters dont know policy, so theyre easily taken in by image. But I dont buy that. For one thing, they do generally love the gotcha style of journalism you say A, but you used to say B and as Chait has just demonstrated, you can have a field day doing that on Ryan.
Also, what about the Very Serious deficit-hawk groups that gave Ryan an award for fiscal responsibility? They can crunch numbers; they can surely see as clearly as I can that Ryans plans are fake, that when you strip out the implausible and unspecified they amount to a deficit-increasing plan to take from the poor and give to the rich.
in full: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/
The Legendary Paul Ryan
Mitt who?
By Jonathan Chai
http://nymag.com/news/features/paul-ryan-2012-5/